-321 How do you rationalize abortions as it being the woman's body, and that she can do whatever she wants with it? Especially if that baby is a male, he has a penis, and that is definitely not part of a woman's body, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Because she doesn't have valves, her heart does. Let's control that, too.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

uhh at first all babies start out as females (thats actually why dudes have nipples) and they are not a fetus until after 8 weeks

by Anonymous 13 years ago

but people have abortions after that too. and it's still creating another life. and even if that fetus is a female, it still isn't the woman's body. Two more arms, legs, etc. and another vagina?...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hahahaha ummmmmmmmmm if it's inside her and needs her blood and womb to live, then yeah it's a part of her body. The entire fetus is part of her body. And she can decide what to do with HER OWN BODY. You make no sense. You know, there are some really good arguments against abortion, but this isn't one of them. It's not logical...at all. In fact, this might be the shittiest, worst-thought-out argument I have ever heard.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The fetus is not a part of her body (in my opinion), but the uterus sure is, and if she doesn't want someone else living in there then that's her business.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

In the first trimester (which is the only time during a pregnancy when US federal law allows for abortions to occur) a fetus has no definitive sex, which means no penis/vagina. And even later on when it does if still clearly is a part of her body considering it shares blood and food and other things with her. If we consider things like hair and toenails to be part of our body, then a fetus sure as hell is too.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

BreakfastFan...amirite's voice of reason:)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That sounds kind of like a motivational poster.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I gagged when i thought of abortions and then the word breakfast.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That's the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

the mom and baby don't share blood. they only share food.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Logic. Feels good.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Uhm, they do share blood :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

actually they don't share blood, because when you think about it if the mom and baby have different blood types then the baby's blood cells would attack the mom's foriegn blood cells and neither would be healthy

by Anonymous 13 years ago

A body part is defined by the common genetic code it shares with the rest of it's body; the unborn's genetic code differs from his mother's. Being inside something is not the same as being a part of something.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Insane Troll Logic, anyone?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's the mothers choice and whether some one agrees with her decision or not, its not up to her. So stop arguing about it.... But this is unsensable, and an irrational reason as to why not to have an abortion. And all the men in the world can argue for or against abortion, but in the end, the woman doesnt give a rats ass what you want and she is going to go with what she feels is right anyway... So save your breath and go screw yourself.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

um i hate aboration but your logic sucks, i have a problem though with abortion being legal but if you kill a pregnet lady its a double murder...so US fedral law its a person in one instance and an inconvience in another?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wow, I hope that you're joking because your logic is so fucking retarded and flawed that I found it funny.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

who gives a fuck if the baby is male or female...if the woman cant take responsibilty for having sex and getting pregnant she shouldnt be having sex. abortion is cowardly not to mention its cold blooded murder

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I agree in a way. Though i believe it's the mothers choice if she wants to keep it or not. She might not have enough money to support her and the baby, which would torture the baby and her with starvation/cold. ANd if she got pregnant due to rape. I'm half and half.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

well see i agree its her choice if she wants to keep it, but by keep it i mean raise it or put it up for adoption. There are some people out there that arent able to have their own children so i think the baby would be better off being adopted out and getting to live. I've had the rape thing come up in coversation before. Personally no i would not want to keep a rape baby, but if you go to the hospital within 72 hours of being raped they can take care of it for you in kind of the same way the mornign after pill does.

by Anonymous 13 years ago