-854 How come that people always say that Harry Potter, Eric Northman etc. Would win over Edward Cullen in a fight? Doesn't matter if he sparkles in the sun or doesn't drink human blood, he's still the closest to indistructible you can get. Harry is human and Eric burns in the sun. Look at the facts and realize that Edward would kick their asses, bigtime. Amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Way to long to read.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

*too

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Way too long. Just goes to show Twilight fans draw things out to make themselves seem smarter. I bet I could kill Edward... with the help of either Harry, Buffy, or my cat.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Makes sense, I guess. Then again, I haven't read HP and wouldn't know better.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Me too. I've been meaning to read Harry Potter, and I've read the Twilight Series about 5 times over?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry or Eric would have to kill Bella first and then Edward would just kill himself.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Edward's first priority is too keep Bella alive and protect her. Plus it also depends on witch book. Cause in the 3rd part of breaking dawn she becomes a vampire...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@274911 (_lalaheadx3): Yeah, Bella's a vampire.... fail :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

He'd probably kill them first, then kill himself :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lol true. How bout Syler from Heroes?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I love HP but Sylar would diminish them all! Oh yeah, and he can't die. I love love love sylar. It's a shame they can never finish the show. :/

by Anonymous 13 years ago

:O are you serious!?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

NBC cancelled it to make room for other shows. (They have a new show called Persons Unknown, it's REALLY good.)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I know! I stopped watching the show a couple of years ago cuz it got really bizarre. But syler would totally take them all down

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Randomly FYI: It's my post originally.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I don't see any reason why Harry wouldn't be able to just Petrificus Totalus Edward and then do with his body as he saw fit (I doubt he would outright kill him).

by Anonymous 13 years ago

but then again, Edward doesn't need to sleep, Harry does. Edward kills Harry in his sleep, problem solved, right?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The question was who would win if Edward and Harry got in a fight, so I doubt that Harry's first move would be to fall asleep. He would petrify Edward and then use fiendfyre to kill him, easy as that.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But can't Harry use protective spells around himself before he sleeps?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

could be, but since edward is sort of dead, maybe the spells won't work on him? HAHA.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

but there are ones specifically for the undead... people don't like them for a reason...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hey, Inferi hate fire, don't they?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

yeah, Whutsurnaym is right.. Just get some gubrathian fire around Edward and he's stuck=]

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Just FiendFyre that sucker.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Let's see him take on Wolverine. I doubt Edward would win that one.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i dont ^__^

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Then you don't know anything about Wolverine. He'd take on every character in Twilight at the same time and emerge victorious.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hallelujah! Someone who is sensible. There are way too many what ifs, but that doesn't matter when it comes to Wolverine. I'm a huge X-MEN fan, and Wolverine isn't one of my favorites, but he would win. And yes i've read both the twilight saga and HP and I'd give it to Harry. He's the chosen one for a reason. The only special thing about Edward is that Bella chose him.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Blade would kill all of them anyways.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry Potter is a WIZARD, not just human. And Avada Kedavra worked the first time, Cedric Diggory ;]

by Anonymous 13 years ago

^This, just so right and awesome and yeah

by Anonymous 12 years ago

So right!! I mean i know harry potter is totally awesome, but still, edward could win maybe..!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

edward wouldn't come close avada kedavra is universal.besides that, he knows the torture and mind control spells taught to him in the sixth book.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry could Avada Kedavra Edward, but considering Edward is already dead...I have no viewpoint on the subject. Ah.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Edward? Indestructible? No, not at all. Hulk, juggernaut, Dante, Wolverine, Colossus, Alucard, Alexander Anderson, Sabertooth, Superman, Sentry, Dr. Manhatten, Onsluaght, Jean Grey, Dark Schneider, the Living Tribunal, Doomsday, etc. are all indestructible and make Edward look like a little kid. Edward is just an ordinary vampire without a few weakness'.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hell no! Harry's just gotta use the Imperius curse and make Edward kill himself.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Vampires can't kill themselves, that's why Edward went to the Volturi in New Moon......

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's cause they can't bring themselves to do it. The imperius curse makes them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Mmm no pretttyyy sure he physically can't. Edward wanted to die in New Moon and he had to get help because they can't actually commit suicide.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

what a joke. all he had to do was throw himself into the fires Mordor, that would decapitate him AND burn him. :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If you think being able to shout a command while holding a wooden stick and kicking a dark lords ass is a human trait, then apparently harry potter is a human. But, between us, I heard he's this thing, called.....a wizard. but SSSSHHHH!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

edward cullen shouldn't even be in the same sentence with eric northman, eric would kick some serious ass, (:

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Why is it thT people bAsh on twilight? Because if you left it up to me and their is only one book aloud left on the planet, twilight would be my choice. And you cant say I don't know what I'm am talking about because I have been in advanced english class since i can remember and we have have discused twilight vs Harry poTter in much debates! Twiilight is better, face it! Even my teacher says so. Anyone agree wit me here?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(The Golden Girl): Advanced english. Yeah, that paragraph really shows it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(The Golden Girl): agree

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(The Golden Girl): This has nothing to do with ones intelligence level, it's all about taste. So your reasoning makes no difference in this argument. HP FTW.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

agreeing with you ispeakparseltongue. the girls in my class read Twilight.. and none except for me read HP. But about 90% definitely know which is better. HP just rules.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Why is it thT people bAsh on twilight? Because if you left it up to me and their is only one book aloud left on the planet, twilight would be my choice. And you cant say I don't know what I'm am talking about because I have been in advanced english class since i can remember and we have have discused twilight vs Harry poTter in much debates! Twiilight is better, face it! Even my teacher says so. Anyone agree wit me here?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(The Golden Girl): I sincerely hope your poor grammar was a joke.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's a matter of opinion, but I think Harry Potter Is better, though also not my favorite. Also, people ridicule twilight because it has many plotholes, vampires don't sparkle, Bella is a Mary Sue, vampires most definitely DON'T sparkle, All of the Males are Gary Stues, THE VAMPIRES FUCKING SPARKLE, and most people just plain think it's horribly written.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Why is it thT people bAsh on twilight? Because if you left it up to me and their is only one book aloud left on the planet, twilight would be my choice. And you cant say I don't know what I'm am talking about because I have been in advanced english class since i can remember and we have have discused twilight vs Harry poTter in much debates! Twiilight is better, face it! Even my teacher says so. Anyone agree wit me here?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(The Golden Girl): I sincerely hope you're a troll. You're definitely not in advanced English. Everyone I know who has made it into accelerated English classes, including myself, has loved Harry Potter rather than Twilight. There are gaping plot holes and no depth to the stories. It's all cliche and happy. Where is the extreme courage and bravery? The power of just simply loving someone? The friendship? The wisdom? The trust? Twilight is simply dependence. Bella needs a crutch to be happy. She can't live on her own, or else she spirals into a deep depression. She can't or won't stand up for herself, but she remains seemingly perfect. It's utterly ridiculous.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hooray for reading old posts and being unable not to reply! Here I go... Forget what you think you know about vampires and how they "don't sparkle" because they can do whatever a writer wants them to do; they're fictional characters that can change however one wants. Bella would do anything for her family and her baby. She puts others above herself (which Harry tries to do many times when he wants to leave and find Voldemort on his own, but his friends don't let him and he needs them). Twilight, to me, is about finding your true place in the world and fighting for that. It's about loving and protecting those around you (which in the end Bella does exactly that). That said, do I think Harry Potter is better? Yes. Do I think it is more well written and an over all far greater story? Yes. I still like Twilight, though and see no need for fans of either series to bash the other. Oh and The Golden Girl is an idiot... Also, as far as the who would win thing goes...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

... I think it depends on who sees the other first. If Harry could freeze Edward before he attacked, Harry would win. But Edward is fast and if he saw Harry first, he would win. Either way though, I doubt either would attack the other anyway.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

(The Golden Girl): dude harry has spells, and all the shitbags in twilight sparkle i think its plain who wins

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ok, just letting you know, there's no real classification of vampires, because VAMPIRES AREN'T REAL. Neither are wizards. That's why writers and basically everyone are free to manipulate the legends and urban myths and THAT is why everyone loves them

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But there is a certain...physique, I guess, to all urban legends. For example, vampires drink blood, sleep in coffins, wear funny-looking robes, turn into bats, and don't have reflections. That is a vampire. It's been established. Wizards and witches have wands. They have cauldrons. They have spells. They make potions. That's a wizard, that's a witch. Changing the morbid views of vampires to fit your crappy teenage fantasy causes problems. Vampires eat people. They don't marry humans. THEY EAT THEM.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

mmm no see that's not right. Steph Meyer is free to manipulate the legend if she wants to, and if no one agreed and no one liked it then no one had to read it. But they did.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But it ruins it for those who liked the legend. Now when we say something like, "Oh yeah I'm a vampire" jokingly, people are like "LOLOLOL U SPARKUL?!" She ruined intelligent people for the next 2 generations.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(The Golden Girl): The only reason why twilight is the better book is because it better suits demographics, has more colorful literature and the main character has no personality so its easy for a reader to place themselves in the main character's shoes. From a logical perspective yes, twilight wins, but Harry Potter has a better overall story Plot and more well developed characters

by Anonymous 13 years ago

haha WHAT! with that logic you could say that twilight is better than hamlet, just because it's less difficult to read.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

From the perspective of a recreational reader and not a teacher or critic, yes. But what i meant was that the literature flows more smoothly and the author uses more literary devices and is generally more well written

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I know what you are saying, but I do not think there are more than two major literary devices used throughout the book. The writing was meant to mimic a fourteen year-old-mindset in how the character thinks and acts. Those type of girls may appreciate hearing how gorgeous Edward is every two pages.. but no thanks, I'll take an actual book, with, you know, a plot and meaning in it=]

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Exactly what I'm trying to say

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I know what you mean. Twilight is so alluring to adolescent girls because the character has the same mentality. "I want a boyfriend. I need a boyfriend. My life sucks without one." That's why girls read it. They get a superstar boyfriend. And Twi-moms? Jacob has abs. They're creepy perverts who obsess over a 17 yr old for his body. They should be arrested or something, because a man would, but oh well.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

One important thing you left out, Edward, is indeed, a pansy. Yeah, I know he's near indestructible, but Harry has a large arsenal, but I guess he could lose >_>. But you can also throw in Solid Snake, Captain Falcon, or Chuck Norris, then Edward would be a pile of glitter glue.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Even Peach, if you have the right person using her ;) And Solid Snake could own on his own if he gets the Final Smash

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry could probably Sectumsempra [I believe that's the spell. Been a while since I read the 6th and 7th books] Edward's limbs and then create a fire. From afar. On a broomstick. Edward can't fly. And magic works on dead people. 2nd book- Lockhart's books. He didn't actually accomplish the tasks, but someone did. Someone killed a vampire according to one of his books, unless I am mistaken. And if vampires are technically dead, spells do indeed work on vampires. So, Edward would lose.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

impeccable logic, my dear Watson.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Only problem is that Edward isn't a real vampire. But I agree completely that Harry would win

by Anonymous 13 years ago

True, but according to OP, he seems to be categorized as a "vampire"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Haven't we already established that the OP is an idiot though?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If Edward were in fact a real vampire, then he would burst into flames, or turn into stone when the sum comes up. So, theoretically, Harry just has to wait until morning, and he'll automatically win when Edward bursts into flames. But, since, Edward sparkles, I'm going to say that he is not a vampire, rather, just a normal gay teenage male who puts on a ton of glitter every morning, and just creates this story of himself being a vampire in the hopes that people will like him

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I love you

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Eric Northman? Excuse me? He is 1000 years old bad ass viking. You haven't read all the true blood books have you? I am guessing not. You are just bitter because you didn't receive your Hogwarts letter. Harry and Eric are beast. Edward is a pussy.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Edward wouldn't have the guts to kill either of them. He'd spend a century moping over it, curled up in someone else's attic eating a tub of blood-flavored Ben & Jerry's and crying while he watches 'The Notebook' or some other sappy neo-classic crap. Harry, however, would stupify ass and take names.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

<3 <3 <3 That is all.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

None of them would win in a fight. None of them are real. Debate over =D

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Actually Harry potter is real

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(mRS pOTteR): ... *walks away slowly*

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(mRS pOTteR): People like you make me question my love for Harry Potter.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

dude harry potter is real, i met him at hogwarts before he graduated. SUCK ON THAT!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I have read both twilight and harry potter. Neither characters were real, but if they were, harry potter could take down edward hands down. Twilight is for the people who have a very creative and OBSESSIVE life.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

two words: AVADA KEDAVRA.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Two words: Mind Reading

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1 word: Pixie.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

one word: Legilimency.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I was gonna say that! you think like a Brit :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Anybody thought about Edward reading his mind to see what he can do?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Reading his mind isn't gonna be much use when he gets his ass sectumsempra'd.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Plus in the 5th book Harry learned to block people from getting inside his head. So Edward would be at a lose. And don't say you can't block Edward. You just have to have enough willpower or stupidity in Bella's case.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Haha, true. I hadn't even thought of Occlumency! :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Note, Harry completely failed at Occlumency, Voldemort still tricked him. Although, Harry did manage to turn it back on Snape one time.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

He still has the ability to do it though. He just needs to really focus. He was fifteen at the time so he didn't know much. And didn't really understand the dangers of not knowing Occlumency

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes "mind-reading" (legilimency) is only useful in Harry Potter to have the ability to try and block a curse coming at you. Since Edward can't use magic, it would be useless to him

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If you like hairy potter then why dont ya go fuck a goblin or whatever the hell is in those goddamn fairy tales. Stop talking shit about REAL literature, REALISTIC plot, and characters who are REAL, otherwise known as TWILIGHT. Ever heard of it? You goddamn fucktards, hairy potter is BULLSHIT. Get a life.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1.I would rather not screw your mom 2. REALISTIC? VAMPIRE! HE'S A VAMPIRE! 3.Realistic plot? It consists of vampire wars and vegitarian vampires. Sooooooo realistic. And if you honestly thing Twilight is better than Harry Potter, I will personally you. Friggin "Hairyass" goblin child.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

personally eat* you. Im tired.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Twilight may be good for the over obsessive teenage girl, but Cirque Du Freak was the best "alternate take" on vampires of all time.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

there are so many wrong things in your post... twilight includes vampires and werewolves. now i'm fairly certain, pretty sure, that neither of those exist. therefore, they're not REAL. and anyways, have you ever read war of the worlds? the time machine? the invisible man? DRACULA?!?! now THOSE are quality sci-fi. and ps- HAHAHAHAHA. realistic plot. that's a good one. you should think long and hard about who you're calling a goddamn fucktard, loser.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But none of Twilight's characters are real either....

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Absolutely ANYONE can beat edward

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Cedric digory wasn't good enough for the Harry potter movies so voldemort killed him off. Harry is still alive.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If you like hairy potter then why dont ya go fuck a goblin or whatever the hell is in those goddamn fairy tales. Stop talking shit about REAL literature, REALISTIC plot, and characters who are REAL, otherwise known as TWILIGHT. Ever heard of it? You goddamn fucktards, hairy potter is BULLSHIT. Get a life.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Sorry, but no plot that contains fucking sparkling leech fairies calling themselves "vampires" is "REALISTIC"...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well, Edward would probably be fast enough to kill Harry before he had the chance to use a spell to kill Edward or to protect himself...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Or Harry could just set a perimeter around him on fire. Vamps hate fire, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I hate how the Twilight vampires don't have any weaknesses. This is why I hate the books -- all characters NEED to have a weakness.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

What's twilight?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That time of day? You know. right before sunset?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lucius would beat all their asses,and I much prefer Jessicas Guide to Dating on the Dark Side. The story is much better written,good develiment and no plotholes from what I can see....but I'd rather choose a diffrent book then swabble like idiots. And actually Damen from Evermore would beat all their asses cause he's immortal...tehe

by Anonymous 13 years ago

PSHH. eric would demolish edward in half a second. edward's only like 100 years old. eric is 10X his elder.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(hairyass):do us all a favor and get a LIFE. please because you have no idea what you are talking about or who you are going against...ill give you a hint...the boy is the chosen one and he beat "he who must not be named"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

We already had proof Harry is better than Edward. Hmm, let's see, who died in the fourth Harry Potter book and movie? That's right. CEDRIC DIGGORY.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

CEDRIC DIGGORY ISNT EDWARD.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Played by the same actor!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If you like hairy potter then why dont ya go fuck a goblin or whatever the hell is in those goddamn fairy tales. Stop talking shit about REAL literature, REALISTIC plot, and characters who are REAL, otherwise known as TWILIGHT. Ever heard of it? You goddamn fucktards, hairy potter is BULLSHIT. Get a life.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

um, did you just refer to a plain-as-a-wall girl falling in love with a boring-as-paper-desperate-as-YOU-girly-stalky-vampire as classic literature? check yourself man.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@278938 (KCI): By the way, i don't know why my post is coming up green. I voted no.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

dude... in twilight there are still vampires(unrealistic), but unlike REAL LITERATURE(dracula) all of dem shitbags SPARKLE!!!!! and btw why would ANYONE fuck a goblin??? you must mean dobby the house elf. whpo would kick your big hairy ass for insulting harry potter and those who love him... you must really want edward mcfagbagto stare at you while ur sleeping.. and by the way.. who wouldnt save the person you love from pain and suffering??? EDWARD!!! bella needs a brain so that a) edward could read it and get over himself, and b) she would realize that the kickass(as in edward's) werewolfs(also in harry potter), are better for her and that she should leave edward to go die in italy..

by Anonymous 13 years ago

your main character died in our movie. just stop. gosh.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i'm still just laughing at The Golden Girl's post. advanced english for 2nd graders maybe. but not high school level i hope, or you'd have some very, very unintelligent peers.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Why don't you go back to my life is twilight and stop bothering us? Kaaaythanks. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay, here's how it goes. Yes, Edward has a one up on Eric... sort of, but Edward has to be in arms' reach to attack someone. All harry has to do is go "Imperio!" and instruct Edward to walk into fire, decapitate himself or some form of the two. The end. Harry wins.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

From what I've gathered in reading an entirely unoriginal book by Meyers Edward has really only two power: speed and reading minds. Apparation takes care of the first one and harry can block his mind from others. Additionally, harry could simply plant into the foolish quixotic mind of Edward that Bella is dead and the dumb sap would go cry to the vampire lords like he did in the second. Or worse, he could give Bella a love potion and Edward would feel unrequited love. Although I much prefer Ginny to Bella because Ginny, unlike Bella, is a round character and not flat (And im not talking about the actresses) and could actually defend herself and others. Im pretty sure Edward wouldn't stand a chance.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ginny is rather good with curses if I remember correctly from the books. So, yes, she could defend herself and others.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh, pathetic.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Eric is almost 2000 years old while Edward is 100. He obviously knows more than Edward and is waaaaaaaay hotter.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

HA! ya sure little fairy is hot:)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There are endless possibilities in what will happen if these guys had a fight . Anything could happen, use your imagination! =]

by Anonymous 13 years ago

oh, what a discussion this turned out to be. i do love edward, eric and harry and what i really think is that they are ALL awesome, but since they're not even in the same story, i guess we will never know who wins. make love, not war ;)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Edward has his super speed, he can killy Harry Potter before he even takes his wand out... and read his mind and stuff, same with the Eric dude.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry could just use Incendio on Edward. Inferi hates fire. And if Edward CAN defeat anyone, it doesn't make him cool, just a Gary Stu.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, Harry would not be able to kill Edward because he is Cedric ONCE. But he woulda Avada Kedavra his sparkly ass anyways

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ok, umm wow this is now a massive debate. but i would say edward wins. for one he has insane speed and can attack harry before he pulls out his wand. edward can read minds and then-fore know what harry or eric is thinking, he can use that power in so any ways so he wins. some of you are saying that harry or eric would just kill Bella and then edward would go of and kill himself. yes he would kill himself but AFTER he kills who killed Bella. Edward is also indestructible whilst harry is human, and easy for edward to kill. eric burns in the sun, edward doesn't. and edward doesn't have a weakness, plus there are only a very few ways you can kill a twilight vampire and they all involve getting your hands on him, and edward won't let that happen. so over-all. EDWARD WOULD KICK THEIR ASSES BIG TIME!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, but didn't Harry learn how to block his mind? The mind power is gone. And speed is no use if Harry just uses the spell Dumbledore used to fend off the Inferi. You know, a circle of fire? And while Edward is preoccupied with the fire, Harry can use the Imperius Curse to command him to stand still. After that, he can simply use Secrumsempra to take off all his limbs while the fire does the rest of the trick.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Stake to the Heart!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That doesn't work on edward. read the book.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

dude noone cares what works or not... we are discussing what wed do if it did work... and there is NOway in hell i am EVER reading those books..

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ha ha u idiots are making this a real matter

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Edward only has two weapons in his arsenal. Harry has an ulimited amount. And because of that Harrry can defeat Edward.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Bullshit! Pertrificus his ass and do whatever the hell you'd like. As easy as not liking a Twilight Fan.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry is not a human, he is a wizard!!!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Edwart is "indestructible" because he's a freaking Gary-Stu.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah except Harry Potter is a WIZAARD and knows SPELLS so he can easily beat Edward in any kind of fight.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

In the sixth book of Harry Potter at Slughorns party, a vampire is seen under the control of other Wizards. If Vampires could kill wizards then the wizards would not have been in control. while it may be true that vampires are industrucable, obviously wizards can cause them enough pain to control them and win against them in a fight.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Haha, I like how the people defending Twilight are just bringing up the mind reading and speed over and over but the HP fans actually have a different argument each time.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Steps to whollop Edward: 1. Harry uses protego on himself. 2. He uses petrificus totalus on Edward. 3. Sectusempra on Edward. 4. Bun Edward into dust with incendio.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry potter has magic!.! It's entirely clear that he would win.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well, seeing as Voldemort-not Edward- was the closest thing to immortal, and Harry killed him.... I vote Harry. And besides, I could take Bella any day, the pathetic bitch. AND I'd win. I'm an 11 year old girl, so what now?!?!?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Back when vampires were cool, they would burn up and in the sun, not sparkle.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Are you guys really arguing about fictional characters over the Internet? ...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It is sad, isn't it?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That it is. This is exactly why I'll read series once then NOT obsess over them. Especially how HP fans go on about how Harry could beat Edward, etc then go criticize Twilight fans. The whole thing is pointless if you ask me.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

well Harry would win if he were willing to break the law, but it says in GOF that killing vampires is illegal according to "paragraph twelve of the Guidelines for the Treatment of Non-Wizard Part-Humans."

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you're my hero :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

why thank you. I'm considering pursuing a career in Magical Law.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Uhm, Im pretty sure if Harry Potter can defeat Voldemort, he could kill Edward wih his pinky. And twilight fans are also so flipping annoying. "team edward!" "team jacob!" The only reason someone would like those books/ movies was becuase jacob has the same last name as sirius black. Just sayin.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Im team edward! scissorhands.. what you thought i meant cullen?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Team Tyler! The guy who almost hit Bella with a car!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

SHUNNED!!!!! Leave this site NOW!!!!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Two words: "Avada, Kedavra"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Harry > Voldemort Voldemort > Thousands of vampires Harry > Thousands of vampires including Edward

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Team Edward...Scissorhands. Send anyone after Edward (Cullen) and they'd kill him, since he'd be sitting in a corner crying about the fact that he sparkles and how he doesn't get to take his shirt off every two seconds like Jacob. He needs to go read Bram Stoker's Dracula and see how much of a wimp he is.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Has this person ever read Dracula? They'd understand how terrible of a vampire book Twilight is compared to it. Did THEY shudder when they heard the Cullens' story, like the average person does when they read about Lucy and Mina? Dracula has a much more powerful effect on the human mind...if you're sane, that is.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

HAHAHA, thanks OP for the comedy post. I'm assuming, no, HOPING that this was indeed a comical. Because if you're being serious, it's just ridiculous. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Um, he's a FREAKING WIZARD.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well, first we must understand how much of a wimp Edward is. We can compare Twilight to Dracula: 1) When he became a vampire, he just sat in a corner and cried (for all I care), while the group from Dracula went after Dracula and the three sisters after Mina was bitten. 2) Edward is too much of a wimp to go after humans, while Dracula preys on mostly women to cause men pain. 3) Dracula preys on you while you sleep and gives you nightmares that you can't remember, but cause you a lot of fear anyway and keeps you awake until you crash. Edward stares at you while you sleep. 5) Dracula is a better love story, although that wasn't the purpose. Mina and Jonathan Harker are in love, and same with Lucy and the three men that proposed to her. When she was turned, her fiance had to kill her himself. That's true love, killing the one you love to save her. And Jonathan promised Mina that if she turned, he would set her free, as well. Team Dracula FTW.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

... dude i agree with this guy ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ on da dracula thing but wit harry potter, he can immobilize edward with teh wand.... even though edward can go super fast, all hed have to do is wait for him to stop, cuz edward is a wimp, no matter what. he can't even save his girlfriend from pain and suffering by turning her, and refuses to do anything before he humiliates her in a wedding. all in all.... edward is faggish and harry is epic..

by Anonymous 13 years ago