Life would be so much easier with slaves, amirite?

Are you willing to be the enslaved?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Exactly.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

yes

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Haha! I'm not talking about a sex slave.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Put yourself in the slaves shoes.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Life wouldn't be easier for the slaves...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well who gives a shit about them?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They aren't just animals. They are people just like you and me and deserve respect. They have family's and friends and people who care about them, THOSE are the people who care for them. Please, TRY to be reasonable. Many slaves were killed. Is that what you want to happen?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That's what robots are for. That way people get to HAVE slaves without anyone having to BE a slave

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But the poor robots! D:

by Anonymous 13 years ago

but then the robots would revolt and take over the world!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No because you have to feed them and make sure they're healthy and plus they'll be whining all the time I'd rather just hire a butler.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

why would you feed them??

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So they wouldn't die while working. Derp.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Your practically saying your too lazy to take care of the slave, after working so hard, read a book about slaves, or are you too lazy to read?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm practically saying that taking care of slaves is too much of a hassle you douche nugget. suck my nuts.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You fail.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Retard.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Robots don't have feelings... There you go...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Dude, this is wrong in so many different ways.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Anything to make the homepage, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

only one way, actually.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's wrong because: 1) Using machines is much more efficient. 2) Slavery is a complete disregard to human rights. 3) It would not, in fact, be easier. Look at all the crap people went through, even the slave owners, even after slavery ended.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

yes, so the post is wrong because 1) slavery is bad you can't just cut a reason into billion pieces and call them all their own separate reasons

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But there are a lot of reasons that slavery is bad., making this post wrong in several ways.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I just said, YOU CAN'T USE ONE REASON AS SEVERAL REASONS ok for example: i want food for one reason - i'm hungry i want food for 3 reasons - i haven't eaten lately, food looks delicious, my stomach will stop grumbling

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But those are all the same thing basically. "Bad" is an insufficient word. It can mean bad as in, immoral, or it can be bad, as in, not a smart thing to do. There can be other reasons too, but I'm not thinking of any.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

there is only one reason, end of story

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You just don't get it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you're the one who doesnt get it by your opinion, EVERYTHING in the world has multiple reasons

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, just somethings. I only said that this ONE THING, had multiple reasons. Don't put words in my mouth, and don't twist them around.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i'm not putting words in your mouth, i'm using your theory ok, give me an example of something that DOESNT have many reasons, only one. and i'll use your theory to prove you wrong.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I sweat to maintain homeostasis. Even if you give different reasons, they have to actually be different, not just the same reason worded differently several times.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

but that's what you did, give multiple differently-worded sentences to describe how bad slavery is

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, they weren't the exact same thing. Saying it's against human rights is completely different from saying it's inefficient. Now fullfill your promise, oh wise one.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you sweat to cool your body down, you sweat to continue your body's natural cycle, you sweat to lose water from your body saying it's wrong and saying it's efficient are both saying that slavery is bad. this post is wrong, and there is only one way it is. if it were something like Flying rabbits on march 42nd eat humans and breathe fire, then the post would've been wrong in MANY ways.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You don't sweat to lose water from your body. You lose water from your body BECAUSE you sweat. They both mean it's bad but they are completely different reasons that it is bad. And cooling your body down, and continuing your bodies natural cycle are the same thing as homeostasis.(Unless you don't know what that means.)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no, you sweat to lose water from your body so you can cool down. listing why slavery is bad is still accepting that slavery is bad. slavery is bad is the reason the post is wrong, so there is only one reason the post is wrong. since you're going to argue about the tiny details, let me remind you that you said "slavery would not be efficient" and you also said "it would NOT be easier" which is the same thing as well lol i just feel bad about the OP, he's going to get notifications about this stupid fight.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

What the heck? Sweating is the ACT of losing water from your body, so that the cool water evaporating cools your skin. Losing water is not a CAUSE of sweating, it the ACT of sweating. It is also wrong, because people should not think this way. If it bugs them the OP can just ignore it, so don't feel too bad.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

lol ok you win im wrong and stupid

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm not saying slavery is right, it's disgusting and should never, ever be done, but the post is right, it would be easier.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I agree. People seem to be missing the fact that this post says "easier" and doesn't mention anything about ethics.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ya'll are so pessimistic. ROBOT slaves much?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It would be physically easier, but the moral ramifications would just fill up my brain and make it impossible to enjoy.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It doesn't matter if you think there should be slaves the op is saying if you had a slave your life would be easier

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Who the heck said no way?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

321 people.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

idiots, the post doesnt question whether its morally wrong or whether you personally would be a slave. it simply states that life would be easier with slaves. this is correct. and if you deny it your probably retarded

by Anonymous 13 years ago

they're not talking about the "horrible things that have happened in the past" to the slaves. i think that having a slave would be the BOMB!! sign me up :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Slavery may be wrong, but even Abe would have to admit life would a lot easier

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This is a horrible post. Why doesn't the op be a slave for us then, we coulld beat him with a whip at his head, make him work with only one sip of water evreryday in the blazing hot sun, and slap him for knowing how to read.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

if some people agreed with this they might want to make YOU a slave

by Anonymous 13 years ago

While technically true, and not explicitly suggesting anything, still morally wrong.

by Anonymous 13 years ago