+473 The Bible: Pics or it didn't happen, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Whoever made this post deserves a cookie.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lol maybe but I've seen it before... http://i.imgur.com/YQ11N.jpg http://knowyourmeme.com/i/24990...jpg?1257228851 http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/...jpg?1257228839

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hahaha.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

TRUTH.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Funny, but it just doesn't fly for me. Sorry!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

False. I am severely disappointed in all the people who also voted it down, and haven't stood up for it yet. Besides the Weasel. Evolution, pics, or any historical sources about it, or it didn't happen.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

jeez dude its a joke. if it were about, oh i dont know, the koran, youd be laughing.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, it isn't a joke. That is literally one of the better arguments I've heard against it, you know? Most of them are like "You didn't see it." And I'm like "Well not one person has witnessed evolution. Ever. Have you ever seen a dog create a non-dog?" Don't think so.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well yeah, you're mom created you didn't she?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(:D): I'm a human. She's a human. How is that evolution? Unless you're suggesting that I am so talented I cannot be human, in which case you are incorrect.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You fail at intelligent comebacks.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(D:): Really? I said that was incorrect. That was wit, and just because you are too dumb to understand it, the value isn't lessened.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ah, of course. Wit. How could I have missed it? Your intelligence is that of the gods good sir. Oh excuse me, of GOD.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, no. I am nowhere near omniscient. Intelligent I may be, compared to the average population, but even I cannot compare to the All Mighty. I doubt even Rowena herself could.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

dude, okay its people like you that give christians a bad name. i heard this saying once: ' i dont mind God, its his fan club i cant stand' ^point in case.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I believe it was Ghandi who said "I like your Christ, I don't not like your Christians".

by Anonymous 13 years ago

im a christian and i totally agree with that quote XD

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Then you're not a Christian.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Then who isn't a Christian? And what makes them so?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If you are a Christian you believe in your heart that Jesus is Lord. They, by agreeing with the statement, are saying that it didn't happen.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Virgin...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Just saying, evolution does not have to create a completely new species. We could make new adaptations, or a mutation could occur, just like blue eyes, or something like that. The definition of evolution is: change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Great point! I don't get this page...pics or it didn't happen? What fucken moron didn't know that cameras weren't around in biblical times. Yeah evolution is true but who made the very first living creature to have it in turn start evolving into other species? Think about it. Someone had to make it, all this shit didn't just appear.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I think this is meant to be taken as a joke to be honest since If he wanted attack Christianity's validity there are so many better arguments that you can choose.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well, actually, there is evidence that species adapt to their surroundings through generations.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Evidence" for adaptation or microevolution, but not macroevolution. And I know it's a joke. But I can still bash it, yes?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

if it were a bad joke, yes. but its funny. and at the end of the day, its just that, a joke.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(brunetterox915):No, right now it's a joke, but at the end of the day it really isn't.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"The genome-wide comparison, performed by biologists at the University of California, Berkeley, uncovered more than 30 genes with DNA mutations that have become more prevalent in Tibetans than Han Chinese, nearly half of which are related to how the body uses oxygen. One mutation in particular spread from fewer than 10 percent of the Han Chinese to nearly 90 percent of all Tibetans." http://tiny.cc/07kbk

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That's still microevolution because both Tibetans and Han Chinese are still human. Macroevolution means a species becoming another species.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Macroevolution is thought of as the compounded effects of microevolution. Speciation has been observed. Notably in plants http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442920/?tool=pmcentrez But also http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Nicholas Matzke and Paul R. Gross have accused creationists of using "strategically elastic" definitions of micro- and macroevolution when discussing the topic.The actual definition of macroevolution accepted by scientists is "any change at the species level or above" (phyla, group, etc.) and microevolution is "any change below the level of species." Matzke and Gross state that many creationist critics define macroevolution as something that cannot be attained, as these critics describe any observed evolutionary change as "just microevolution". " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolution#Misuse source: Matzke, Nicholas J. and Paul R. Gross. 2006. Analyzing Critical Analysis: The Fallback Antievolutionist Strategy. In Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch, Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for Our Schools, Beacon Press, Boston ISBN 0807032786

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I only have a basic understanding of microevolution and macroevolution; so when I say microevolution I mean adaptation and by macroevolution I mean the theoretical idea of a species becoming two separate species. Maybe there are better words for those two ideas, but I don't know them. The examples you gave for speciation looked suspiciously like a modification inside of a species due to a few mutations, not a species changing into a noticeably different species (adaptation/mutation, not macroevolution) to me. You seem well informed, so I have a few questions for you regarding evolution; how did they eye form step-by-step in a way that was beneficial to the species during each step? Same question for bones, mitochondria, and any other organs/organelles/structures which you may choose.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

As if the skeletons found that possess both ape and human traits isn't enough. Get your head out of the sand.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Actually there are pics for evolution, it's called fossils!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Those are rocks. Not pics. I could use the same argument for the Bible. "Noah's flood causes most of the animals to be fossilized! Fossils are evidence!" See how it works?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Fine, then take pictures of the fossils, then they're pics. And no, that's not how it works. I'm religious and all, but if you don't believe in evolution, you're just ignorant. In a few hundred years people will be looking at people who didn't believe in evolution the same way we look at people who didn't believe the Earth was round.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Really? I do think the Earth is round, and I do think evolution is wrong. There is absolutely, and let me repeat that, absolutely no proof. PROOF. There is evidence, but not as much as Biblical teachings.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wow. To say there's no proof of evolution might be one of the dumbest things I've heard in a while. There's tons of proof, you're ignoring it. Maybe if you actually were open to other things you would learn that evolution happened and it can coexist with religion.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Not with my religion, buddy. The Bible says God made Earth in six days. Dawn, then dusk, day 2. Not through million's of years of spinning. There isn't PROOF of evolution. Give me proof. You can't. It doesn't exist. You cannot show me a cow that produced a horse. Because it didn't happen.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Dude, you have to stop being so ignorant and should be tolerant of other people's beliefs, just because some body does not believe in the same things as you, it doesn't mean that you have to go around criticizing them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

First of all, the Bible is not a history book, if you're taking it as one then your view of Christianity (assuming you're Christian) is distorted. Second of all, there IS proof of evolution and it's a lot more complicated than turning a cow into a horse. Of course that didn't happen. Don't be ignorant. If there was a passage in the Bible that said "And then God made everything fall to Earth when it rose up" would you dispute gravity? I hope not

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The Bible may not be a history book, but there is more evidence for a creator than for nothing to explode. Show me the "proof" of evolution, and I'll show you a lie. You are so ignorant. Maybe I would believe such a thing, maybe I wouldn't. It depends on how much evidence there is for it. God is all-powerful. So he could do that. But that's hypothetical, and a pointless example.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Scientists most often use the word "fact" to describe an observation. But scientists can also use fact to mean something that has been tested or observed so many times that there is no longer a compelling reason to keep testing or looking for examples. The occurrence of evolution in this sense is fact. Scientists no longer question whether descent with modification occurred because the evidence is so strong" -The National Academy of Science You really think you know more about evolution than the entire scientific community?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Entire. Entire? No. Evolution is the only option besides Divine creation, so all the athiest scientists hop on the bandwagon. You know the tests they do? What do they test? One paltry piece of evidence repeatedly and claim it as fact? Radiometric dating is so inaccurate it's funny. They use circular reasoning to date stuff, and they completely change data to make it fit.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh man, you are so brainwashed. Show me one respected scientist who doesn't believe in evolution. You will be hard pressed to find one. And there is more than one piece of evidence. Get your head out of the sand: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent

by Anonymous 13 years ago

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/012518.html You link, I link. You do realize that anybody can change wikipedia? Wikipedia is a terrible source. I'll give you a scientist. He is a bit.. overzealous, though. Kent Hovind. Research him, and you will stumble across his tax fraud. I will go ahead and tell you. But he, before he was locked up, was willing to debate any evolutionist. He was never stumped.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

First off, you can't just go in and change the evolution Wikipedia page. Maybe 5 years ago you could and maybe on some tiny page you could, but you see those little numbers within the text? Those link to sources, actual, legitimate sources. Instead of giving you all those sources I decided to just give you the Wikipedia page, but they're the same thing. At least get your facts right. Second of all, I looked up this Hovind guy and he sounds pretty crazy. Chemist Karen Bartelt said his "message appeals to those who are unaware that his 'evidence' is without merit" and no actual scientists believe in the Hovind theory.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Without evidence. Funny, when I was listening to him it seemed like he wasn't just saying things. Did you visit my link? About the lies? Pretty good, eh? Still no "Proof," unless you count rigged tests. Also at the bottom, it has undeniable wit: "In connection with which I must say that there is one Darwinian claim that the Darwinians have inadvertently proved: a species that lets itself be suckered by the obvious lies that Darwin's acolytes and publicists have been swilling out for the last 150 years can hardly be thought of as the crown of creation."

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Look, you're obviously unwilling to see what's so obviously true. Evolution happened. If 99% of the smartest people in the world believe something and put good research and thought into it, what makes you believe the 1% is smarter? I'll end with this: don't be like the the Catholic church during the Scientific Revolution when they denied all the scientific advancements and had to eat their words later.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Don't worry. In a few years, after the Rapture, I think you'll realize I'm right. But 99% that was made up on the spot, and you know it. I'm not presenting my best arguments at this time.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Have you not noticed that every one of your comments has been voted down, while CapedCrusader's have all been voted up? Who's wrong now?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Dude, just because most people believe it doesn't make it right. Majority rule is a very risky vote. Have you seen "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" And they ask the audience? The audience has been wrong before. I couldn't care less if my comments were voted down a thousand times. It doesn't matter; common belief is nearly always skewed.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That is a terrible link that is full of mostly opinion with almost no sources to back them up. Also.. it doesn't prove anything about creationism and gives absolutely no evidence. So while he says that evolutionists have no evidence, neither does he.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I might be more inclined to take your link to that site more seriously if I didn't also find this one on there about how we need to abolish equal rights: http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/017178.html I don't understand how these people call themselves patriots without even adhering to the basic principles of the country such as, you know, The Bill of Rights.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The Bible isn't a history book, but do keep in mind that it is full of a lot of history.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

FYI: The Bible isn't meant to be taken verbatim. It's supposed to be a guide as to your morals as a human and such. Most of the stories in it were written hundreds of years AFTER Jesus' death, and then the King James Version of The Bible was put together by a committee of the king's men who decided on what the morals of their society (circa 1100 AD) should be and how The Bible should lead them. Sure, back then that was a great way to control the people and keep them in their "place"- below the king on society's totem pole. But it is just full of pick-and-choose beliefs such as homosexuals are bad, but The Bible says to keep women who are menstruating out of the town which most, non-extremist Christians, choose not to follow. But, all that aside I'd say you're being a terrible "Christian". You aren't respecting greenleader4, CaptainCrusader and the rest of the amirite community by pushing your beliefs on all of us. Go back to the underside of your rock.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You, sir, are wrong. Even if you are a girl, you're still wrong. Any "evidence" to back up your accusations? It took place over several centuries. They canonized it, and it is supposed to be taken literally. The Bible itself says in 2 Timothy 3:16, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness." Every word is intended to be there. Don't start spouting lies, please. Also, in the Old Testament, that was before Christ fulfilled the prophecy. I understand how that is confusing, but they had to perform rituals to alleviate their sin. God and sin cannot coexist. But, Jesus died for us. He himself said in Matthew 15:11, "What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.'" Take that. And I am not being a terrible Christian. We are called to lead others to Christ. I am not being disrespectful or rude. Please take two seconds to verify

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That at least one of your points is correct.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So, if that which goes into a man's mouth does not make him "unclean", can he give another guy a blowjob and still be clean?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Sure. But if he's gay he's going to hell. Unless he repents and accepts the Holy Spirit. Understand?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No. Because Hell doesn't exist... I don't understand.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Really. Do you know that for a fact? Have been everywhere in the universe, explored every single cranny and nook at every different time of the day? Maybe you can only get in on friday the thirteenth at 7:06 whilst drinking root beer. You don't know that for a fact.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm sure you have a lot of friends. You're so fun to talk to. I bet you also get ALL the ladies with your charm. It's great that you have fun instead of coming on the Internet and criticizing people whom you don't even know. I bet a whole lot of people really like you. I am certain that you will NOT brainwash your children into this cult that you are NOT creating. That is, if you ever get laid, which I'm CERTAIN you will. It's wonderful that you're accepting of everyone, especially gays. You must be such a fun guy in general who DOESN'T give Christians a bad reputation because you LOVE enjoying life!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Thank you! You know, at least I don't post sarcastic replies trying to insult the other party when I'm trumped with logic. Understand? Don't make it personal. I also see that you're hiding behind the face of Anonymity. Too scared to reveal who you are? Man up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, actually, you are just a stubborn ass (oh, does it offend you that I'm calling you names?) who can't take into account that he is not always right. I was trying to prove to you that you need to SHUT UP. This is a freaking website based on opinions, which means that you'll never be able to win over everybody. Stop trying to shoot us down, and we'll stop shooting you down. Maybe you're right, maybe you're wrong. NO ONE KNOWS. So, leave it alone. Who cares if you win an argument on the Internet? Will that bring you satisfaction? My guess is that everyone you know hates listening to you talk because you always bring up your beliefs and you make others feel insignificant. So, you resort to the Internet to try and feel better about yourself. You think that you can find some poor, innocent sap who you can metaphorically murder. I realize that I am attacking you. But you deserve it, honestly. Please, just SHUT UP, and I will as well.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Uncle Leo?? So, let me get this straight. You think that I, who have been nothing if not respectful, make myself feel better to win an argument of the internet, when you, the one who has been cursing and calling me names the whole time, don't? I am appalled. Good day to you, sir or madam.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You may have been "respectful", but you are also being very arrogant.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no offense but what you call "being respectful" is not what the greater poplulation would agree is indeed being respectful. Threatening somebody, and questioning their beleifs, and buttering the whole thing up with "big words", is not at all repectful

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wow you bash him for assuming that he'll isn't real and that there's no proof of he'll not existing, but you yourself say there is enough to prove it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

How the hell would you know? Unless you REALLY have no live like you make it seem; How old are you even? You are obbessed with Disney songs for Christ's Sake! And yes, I did put Christ so get over it. I'm honestly sick and fucking tired of your 'logic' that you can't even prove without a fucking 'holy' book. Science has fact, books, scientists, and so many things to back it up while you have a group of people who can't get the stick out of their ass. Besides, if you are so intouch with the Holy Spirit, why are you on a computer? It goes against most of the morals as my heavily relgious friends have told me. She doesn't even have TV or see movies in class due to her faith yet she isn't as bitchy and controlling as you are about people who don't argee with her. As you stated on your profile, if you don't agree then you are stupid and need your brain checked. With so many people against you, you should be getting that check-up

by Anonymous 13 years ago

How does it work for a book to validate ITSELF? it seems like if you want a validity check you would have to go to some other form of media for support.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

are you from texas?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@428516 (scrantoncity): Doesn't it also say he created man in those days? When did he create then kill the dinosaurs who's fossils have been dated to centuries before any kind of human-like forms even started to evolve? Try not being so close minded. Also where in the bible does it say that you should look down upon and insult people of different beliefs? I don't recall reading that shiny tidbit.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(A*gasp*Non): I didn't insult them because they are a different religion, nor because I look down on them. They are blatantly lying, and misinterpreting stuff. Makes you pretty frustrated. Repeatedly. But, the dating processes... Don't believe any of that. The scientists use circular reasoning. You cannot date it with carbon dating if you don't know how old it is, because it could be over 50,000 years. And you can't date it with uranium-lead dating if you know how old it is. So basically, you can only uranium lead date things if you don't know how old it is. And you can only carbon date it if you know how old it is. WTF?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

technically in the bible there was proof that earth was in the center of the world. Thats why the church denied galliles theory

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The earth IS the world.. Also don't make stuff up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/world definition number 9: everything that exists; the universe; the macrocosm. next from wikipedia the Catholic Church nevertheless condemned heliocentrism as "false and contrary to Scripture",[10] and Galileo was warned to abandon his support for it—which he promised to do. When he later defended his views in his most famous work, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, published in 1632, he was tried by the Inquisition, found "vehemently suspect of heresy," forced to recant, and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.[11][12] This passage proves that 1) the church denied gallileos theory and 2)that this was contrary to the church's view "false and contrary to Scripture"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay; I cannot believe the amount of ignorance of such people. I am not Catholic; I'm Baptist. We are polar opposites. There IS a reason why the Protestants split. I simply do not agree with the Catholic church on most subjects. It does not say the earth is the center of the "world" based on the ninth definition of the word, anywhere. That is the Catholic Church, not the Bible, and there wasn't "proof;" there was (not) a reference to it. If you're gonna completely change the facts while trying to back up your statement, at least be sure to use the best description, and not the ninth best.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You criticise others for not having good enough proof, yet you have still not given any proof of your own out of the Bible and that one time you said (this is paraphrased) "There is a lot of proof, I won't bother mentioning it because you won't understand" ... or something like that. Until you give proof, you have no right telling someone alse to back up their statement.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(#511253) I was going to explain it, but nobody replied.. I'll explain it to you. It's more logic than tests that have a high chance of being wrong, or at best, inconclusive. I'll explain it, if you'll actually bother reading it.. If not, then no way, for it's a ton of typing.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Please explain it. I'll read all of it, I'm actually curious about your proof. Unlike a lot of people I'm open to ideas different than my own. I may not agree with it, but if it makes since I won't complain about it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay; it's in two parts. The first point: Everything that has a beginning has a cause, right? That is, things don't assemble themselves randomly, trees don't spring up in the middle of the street, and horses don't sprout fully grown in your bedroom, right? Things cannot bring about their own existence, right? It is essential that you agree to this logical statement.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I agree that you can't get something from nothing (I think that's what you were trying to say).

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay, yeah that's what I meant. Something has to initiate the creation of something. That's only logical. Part 2: The universe began to exist. This is fairly simple. The scientists "proved" it back some hundred years ago. And mathematicians theorized that it has to be true. This is accepted as fact; the Universe must have begun at some point. The funny thing is, that before this was "proved," the evolutionists were arguing against the second part, for it is simply preposterous to argue the first point. Do you agree? It's going against logic, common sense, and rational thought, not to mention that it is constantly confirmed every day. The first point is so logically inevitable, you'd think it ridiculous that someone would say it's untrue. Then, once it was proved, the anti-theologians attacked the first point. It's utterly absurd. Finally, the third point. Have you taken Geometry? Do you recall the Transitive property? This is fairly straightforward...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Therefore, the universe had to have been created. Pretty simple. This argument is solid logic, and is confirmed every day. When you go out do you ever worry that a dinosaur will appear in your house and wreak havoc? No! That is preposterous. The 'scientists' who claim the big bang started it all are deluded, in my opinion.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I get your point, but it does not support your disclaims to evolution. I'm sorry, but all you have done is said the universe had a beginning and something had to spark that beginning. Evolution is not the theory that the universe had always existed. It is not a theory that is trying to disprove intelegent design. It is a theory of how newer, more intelegent species were created. I do not see why the scientist who support the big bang theory are diluded. The big bang theory is not about something coming from nothing. It's about a super dense mass of matter that exploded and the universe is the debris from that explosion basically. It states that matter was not created, it just expanded. It is common knowledge that the universe is still expanding, which is why scientists thought up the big bang theory. I am not afraid of dinosaurs because they went extint long ago. And I really do not see how dinosaurs wrecking havoc are relevent to your argument.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, you completely misunderstood everything I said, and that isn't surprising. Are you like twelve or something? 'Diluded?' 'Intelegent?' The theory of evolution is the only one where INTELLIGENT (Not 'intelegent') Design can be thrown out. What part of my argument do you disagree with? Huh? Nowhere? Then why do you disagree! I am so mad. You said you would read it, and now you are just blowing it off. Should be expected from a twelve year old. The Big Bang says nothing exploded. Where did the super-compressed matter come from? What was before it? Answer all these questions, or you have the weakest belief I've heard of. Can't you back up or even articulate your beliefs?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

what facts did i change??

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Your argument changed, not facts. You said the Bible said the earth was flat. No, that is a lie. The catholic church said that, not the bible.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@526492 (scrantoncity): This was my first comment technically in the bible there was proof that earth was in the center of the world. Thats why the church denied galliles theory if the center is the place where "things are flat" maybe your right but i dont believe it works like that

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I didn't understand that nonsense. The Bible says nowhere that the earth is the center of the 'world.' I accidentally said 'flat' instead of 'center of the world,' up there. Show me in the Bible where it says the earth is in the center of the world. You said it said so; back it up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

it dint say it openly but strongly suggest it normally you talk about the center of the world before the sides

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I know what you're comment is talking about, but I think he was excommunicated for saying the Earth revolves around the sun and not the other way around. The Catholic Church said that since the Bible mentioned the sun "rising" then the sun must be moving around the Earth. I don't know for sure if that's true, but it is what I learned in History.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

" There is absolutely, and let me repeat that, absolutely no proof. PROOF. There is evidence, but not as much as Biblical teachings." ... soooo... there's evidence, but there isn't proof? wow, you sure do make a lot of sense... Also, i don't really see how some book saying something makes it true. they could have said "and on the eighth day, god decided to create flying purple elephants to take his place in the world and make sure life was good!" and the freaks like you would believe there was such a thing as a flying purple elephant who was the embodiment of god. not to interrupt your argument, CapedCrusader, you're doing a very good job. I was just reading through all this and thought i'd put my two cents in along with all of srantoncity's bullshit.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That was a bunch of unlinked drivel, lauren. The thing is, I could say the exact same things about scientists. They can make up a bunch of tests, make up some evidence, and present it as fact. Oh wait! But the sad thing is that you had to make up something, and personally attack my beliefs, and yet you still didn't make a good point. Evidence isn't proof. You're the lowliest of imbeciles if you believe that. You really need to take a good long look at what you believe, and I sincerely hope it is much better articulated than what you just wrote.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Evidence is a synonym for proof you ignorant, stupid fool. they mean the same thing. if a scientist performs an experiment multiple times and gets the exact same result every time without any changes, they aren't "making up some evidence", its a FACT that the experiment will produce the same results every time. now, i know you can't do an experiment for evolution, but fossils have been found that are freakishly similar in appearance, skeletal structure anatomy to animals living before and after that fossilized animal. its obvious, evolution is real. animals adapt to their surroundings. evolution happens, whether you want it get that through your thick skull or not. besides, maybe the animals god supposedly created ADAPTED TO THEIR FUCKING SURROUNDINGS. then, we could both be right.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh, you are right. They do adapt to their surroundings. However, they didn't spawn new animals. Have you ever seen a dog create a non-dog, like a fox? Have you? I don't think so. That's because they don't. But, you say evidence is proof. Yes, proof in it's loosest sense. But, with that evidence, you can come to a wrong conclusion. Suppose I did a test with a frog. I put him on a line and said "Jump frog, jump." And he jumps 50 centimeters. Then I chop off one leg, put him back, and say, "Jump frog, jump." He jumps 40 cm. Then I chop off another leg, leaving two, do the same thing, and he jumps thirty. I repeat it again, tell him to jump, and he jumps 20 cm. Then, I chop off another, leaving him legless, and tell him to jump. He doesn't move. I could come to the conclusion that frogs with no legs go deaf. It's illogical, but it fits. Understand? Also, don't personally attack my beliefs, like vvv Because you have no idea what I would or wouldn't believe.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I've been reading most of this arguement (it's too long to read the whole thing) and I have come to the conclusion that you have no idea what evolution is. It is not one species giving birth to another. Evolution is simply genetic mutations that an organism gets that can be either good or bad. If it's good, the offspring of that organism could inherit that trait and over hundreds of years, the creature becomes different than it is today. If it is bad and the creature has offspring, they could very well form a new species over thousands of years, but until they are indistinguishable (sp?) from what they are now, they will be seen as a new breed of the same species.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Let me ask you something. Give me one, any one, positive mutation. They are all bad. There is simply not a good mutation yet. You obviously haven't poured through the amount of lies or misleading evidence supporting evolution. Many credible scientists know the information is false; it's not just religious nuts.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Have you ever wondered why there are different races of people? That's because of evolution. Over time, people who live in a sunny climate will have darker skin and people living in places without much sun will become more pale. That is why people on the African plains are dark, and most Europeans are light. Their skin color protects their skin from the sun. That is why black people don't get skin cancer as often as white people. That seems like a pretty good mutation to me.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That isn't a "mutation." Please don't make up junk like that. You made up that entire paragraph. That would be an "Adaptation," Not a genetic mutation. Also, even though they won't admit it, most evolutionists think black people are less evolved. They more closely resemble apes, don't you think? They are stronger, more able to bear a load, and have apelike features. Therefore, they are less evolved, right? No. It was adaptation. Evolution doesn't explain black people very well.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

A mutation is a mutation no matter how small and no matter it's affect. A child can be born with green eyes even though no one in the child's family has green eyes. That has no affect on the child, but it is still a mutation. Adaptation and evolution go hand in hand. How do you think things adapt? A fox doesn't automatically go from being able to live in the desert to living on the tundra. They evolve to adapt to their environment.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes yes, and I understand that, but those are adaptations, not mutations. Mutations are when a gene gets messed up, and causes an impossible change in the person. Green eyes, yes, but how would that benefit the child in evolution? There is no beneficial mutation. They are either neutral, or detrimental.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Not all mutations are bad. Think about a baby rabbit with brown parents being born white on snowy a mountain top. That baby rabbit has camoufloge and will more than likely not be caught by a fox or something. That seems like a good mutation to me.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I am honestly curious: have you even taken biology? That is not a mutation. That is simple genetics. Any more bad examples you want to run by me?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hate to butt in, but that is a mutation. If no one else in the bunny family has white fur, the genes and alleles got confused or mixed up. Haven't you taken 7th grade Science? That's when I learned that. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Most white bunnies are a result of dominant genes. There are albino mutations. But they can't pass on the albino gene. I relent, yes that is a beneficial mutation. But I discounted it because they cannot pass it on. That doesn't help their offspring survive. So, that doesn't make any other bunny survive. The whole population would have to receive the exact same mutation for it to help them all.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Evolution doen't happen in only a few years. It takes millions of years for that new species of bunny to be made.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, I know. But they can't pass the trait down to their offspring. Evolution won't help you there, buddy. No matter how much you wish.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They can pass on the allele. The resulting offspring may not have the trait, but they can still carry the recessive gene. The offspring would just have to find another bunny that carries the allele for that trait and then over time there would be more and more genetically superier bunnies.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Actually, mutations can be passed on.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yea that's because evolution takes billions of years to produce a fox from 2 dogs or whatever

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I don't think so. Darwin thought it took a long time, but today people think differently. Did you know it took only twenty years to domesticate foxes? You can have a fox as a pet in Russia. They domesticated them. That's pretty swift.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

domestication is different than evolution... similar, but different

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ok. Get your facts straight. Animals don't just SPROUT OUT NEW ANIMALS!!! God, it takes millions and millions of YEARS to be able to evolve and adapt to the enviroment. There are things that can go wrong during the fertilization process with mutations. Look it up. You honestly really think that everything is perfect? Get your head out of a hole.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It doesn't take millions of years to adapt. Not even close. That is made up. Darwin himself disproved that with the finches. Get YOUR facts straight. Seriously.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Birds are thought to have evolved from reptiles. That doesn't mean that a turtle one day gave birth to a bird, it took thousands if not millions of years for that to happen. That's evolution. If no one can prove that evolution is real and provide evidence (Which there is A LOT of evidence) then what created everything? And you have to give evidence or else it most likely didn't happen.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That is incorrect, but that isn't what I said. They adapt fairly quickly. And by "fairly quickly" I mean in like fifteen generations. They can adapt to their environment. That doesn't mean that new animals go quickly, or that they are even formed from old animals. To me, evolution is illogical. But maybe that is because I actually think for myself. What created everything? Can't you answer that for yourself? An intelligent designer. Namely, the God of Moses, Abraham, and all of us. He spoke the world to be. Because, being all powerful, He would be able to do that. Evidence: It's too much. You won't believe it anyways. It is far easier to disprove evolution than to prove creation. There are only two options: Evolution, or Creation. There is no third option. Evolution has hundreds of inconsistencies. So does the theory of Creation. Evolution is basically a religion. Scientists, even though they deny it, "bend" their evidence for it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You do not have to be for one or the other. It is not a decision you HAVE to make.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The decision you may not have to make, but if you have an opinion, it's one of them. Also, why couldn't you refute my post? Is that the only point you can make? Pretty sad.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You really didn't provide any evidence for creation still. The only evidence you gave, if you can even call it evidence, is "It's too much. You won't believe it anyways." I want to see the facts.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay. This is called the "kalam" argument. It's mostly logic. Therefore, irrefutable. Do you agree that anything that starts has to have a cause? E.G. We don't just see houses popping into existence without someone building it, animals don't spring up from the ground, and computers don't assemble themselves from nothing?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

As for me making up the elephant thing, i was saying that to prove my point that you'll believe anything, no matter how ridiculous, if the bible says its true.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There is honestly no evidence for that. That's like me saying you'd believe the earth doesn't exist if a scientist told you. Because you believe what they say.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@scrantoncity: There isn't prove that the bible is correct either, get over it. Oh yes, some BOOK says it is. While I'm at it, I'm going to go out and bow down to Twilight, Harry Potter, hell let's all worship the Where's Waldo books as well! If you want something to think about for evolution, the T-Rex is related to the chicken. You are obviously one of those die-hard Christians that are against true love just because the couple is gay, that believe they will go to 'heaven' even though they have 'sinned' due to the fact they have spread Gods word. Your God is suppose to forgiving and loving yet all you jackasses do is hate anyone who doesn't see the Light. Well no thanks, I like the dark since it has dinosaurs and cupcakes. Have a lovely day.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are utterly and completely wrong. I don't believe the Bible because it has words. I believe it because there is just as much convincing evidence supporting it as any other theory, historical sources backing many major events, and because it hasn't been proven fallible. Also, the Bible explicitly states that homosexuality is a sin. That doesn't mean we should hate on them, but they cannot, in good conscience, continue to sin while being a Christian. Therefore, they do not have the Holy Spirit in them, so they are not true Christians. I don't care if you are sexually attracted to guys (or girls if you are a girl). I don't. Just don't sin. You can resist the temptation. You can. If you choose to be that noble.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

How do you know that I am completely wrong? Just because you say so? Go back to second grade and grow up. And please, share this amazing evidence just as long as it doesn't belong to a damn bible verse. I'm sorry that I'm a proud person who doesn't believe in relgion or a God since you can believe in a God with belonging to a relgion. I'm not athiest since that is an offical relgion. I'm my own person and not a sheep like you. Oh please forgive me for that since you make it seem like you are so fucking holy. Homosexuality is a sin yes, and they can be a Christian while sinning. The fact you are being so very rude to a female and not even bothering to listen to what I am saying is proof of that. And who said I gave two shits about the fact you are into girls or guys? It's your life, not mine. and it's not noble to deny who you are, it's stupidity. Just you wait, I'm betting that when you finally grow up, you will be gay. And no, not the gay type of gay either

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I will be gay? You are so ignorant. I hope you put a few thousand down on that bet. Wait, put all your assets, including your own life, on that bet, and then I'll be happy. You seem to think that I have one piece of evidence, say Mose's staff to part the red sea, or something, that I haven't revealed to the world or something. That is false. The facts have been laid out in front of your eyes. You, having a secular worldview, interpret evidence far differently from I. You wouldn't believe the evidence I propose, and I've done it about twenty times already. Scroll up, and you can see. I'm not getting into a third argument on the same post over the same thing. "Oh please forgive me for that since you make it seem like you are so fucking holy." I am not holy. I am as bad a sinner as any, and worse than some. I don't follow a book blindly, I do what I think is right, I research stuff, and I listen to both sides. Forgive me for seeing the facts as they are.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You said "I don't care if you are sexually attracted to guys (or girls if you are a girl). I don't. Just don't sin. You can resist the temptation. You can. If you choose to be that noble." Excuse me, but no, they CANNOT choose to be gay or straight. That's like asking you to stop liking girls and suddenly be attracted to guys. You can't do it. And it's not just because you believe it's sinful. You wouldn't be able to even if it weren't a sin in your eyes.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I do believe they are not born "gay." It is an orientation, a choice. They can choose so. I know you can. I bet I could. I'm not gay, so it is an irrelevant hypothetical, but being gay is more like a lust, in my opinion. Not that all straight people, or practically any people at all, don't lust for another, but I think all homosexuality is lust, along with some of straight marriages. Maybe I couldn't; I don't know. But, you can at least squash those feelings, and go through life single. That can be done.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Assuming that there is someone you are attracted to, you can't suddenly snap your fingers and just like that, not be attracted to them any longer. And when you were born, I don't believe you were attracted to both men and women and then decided to be straight. You were most likely only attracted to women, and not men at all. The same would go for people that are homosexual, just of the same gender instead of the opposite.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Like I said, if one really believes in the Christian faith, s/he could easily go through life single. But instead, they live by sexual urges and make up stuff about the Bible to make it seem like not a sin.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay, by all of these posts both above and below, it's clear no matter what I say is going to sway your opinion on the matter. I'm not even going to try and start a religious debate with you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ah, do you mean because I am easily able to refute it, at least in my mind? None of those arguments were valid. If there were one, then maybe it would change my opinion. Thus far, no cigar.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I guess I mean that we all have different views on the matter. You believe your views are valid while we do not, and vise versa.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

What does " I am religous and all" mean?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Exactly what it says. Did I stutter?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hey! It's my favorite over-opinionated sixteen year old!Let me first voice my opinion: I, as a fairly faithful person, find this joke unfunny. Why? I just don't find it that humorous. I don't take offense, and I can see why some people find it funny, but I guess I just don't have a sense of humor. Now, to wage religious war on amirite because of a funny/nonfunny post is absolutely ridiculous. Just sayin'.Also, Caped: I only tagged you to bother you. So that I will do: you're gay and your voice is squeeky, something something, suck your dad, etc. I do not know of any proof of evolution other than fossils, but I won't devalidate your suggestion of evidence, because frankly, I have not read much into it. In short, I won't argue with you, simply insult the fact that you're stupid, gay (because I've concluded that from the web), your mom is a hoe (don't care if she's dead), and such and such. Feel free to reply angrily.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wow, I can't believe you........ Are completely 100% percent right!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wow, am i good or what?! I took a course on learning about someone's entire life on the internet. Let's argue. Topic: abortion!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ever heard of carbon dating?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, actually. And guess what? It's not infallible.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, but "noah's arc" didn't happen millions of years ago. The bible says more like 4000.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

What of it? The methods which they use to date are illogical, and use circular reasoning. There is no, let me repeat that, no reasonable method to date things unbiasedly. Either you date it one way, and take that date, or you date it the other way, and take it that way. Either it's old or young. Depending on your view, you can argue either way which way to date it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Your an idiot.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Is that the best retort you have? Pity, I thought you were at least a little smart. Oh well. Don't let this bother your blissful existence, and remember, look both ways before you cross the street!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Arguing with idiots only brings me down to your level, trust me, I'm probably smarter than you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, and that's not being arrogant at all. You have no idea how smart I am; for all you know my IQ could be 175.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I bet I am smarter than you, considering you blindly follow something without any scientific truth, and then try to defend it with bullshit answers. Seriously? we can date things you know. Plus the bible was written, what was it, oh yeah, 400 years after, and they chose what they want to put into it. The bible is more of a guideline for life, not a religious book.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't written four hundred years after, it was canonized. Maybe you should look that up. You don't know the first thing about dating things. You seriously do not. Nobody knows how to date something where the age is unknown correctly. You cannot. I have defended mine feasibly, what about you?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They literally chose what books to put in the bible, and changed them to fit their plans for it. And you can date things.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's called canonization. They chose WHICH books to put into the Bible. They didn't write new ones to fit it. Also, you can "date" things, but not really.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You can't be serious.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well, if things did evolve, explain to me why we don't see fossils of the inbetween animals. Scientists say: Oooh yes!!! Finally we found ONE fossil of this animal! Everyones gonna believe us now! Well sadly, you're mistaken.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You're mistaken about evolution it seems. It's not a bear evolving into a lion. I'll paraphrase a post below that explained it well: Let's say there's a rabbit with longer feet that can run faster and jump further than most rabbits. Over time, this rabbit and its descendants will live longer than rabbits with shorter feet because they can escape from predators. Many years later, the rabbit population will all have long feet. So yes, there are fossils of this type of change.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Let me tell you something; yes, that is a valid argument. Only for adaptation or 'micro-evolution.' Not for macro evolution. The long-legged rabbits can still breed with each other. They are one species. That is adaptation, not evolution.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Same thing dumbass. You gain an adaptation, when all the inferior species die, then the adaptation becomes to new species. Are you saying that snakes and fish are the same species. Jesus, go back to school.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, the long legged rabbits ARE still rabbits. They can breed with the smaller legged rabbits. For real, dude, if you're gonna insult me, be sure you are actually posting VALID information.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wow, I don't know what's more amusing, the post, or this argument. But anyway, you sir, need to calm down. It was just a joke, don't get your panties in a bunch. Also, please don't try force your religion onto other people. It can get quite annoying. It seems as though everyone is against you. I'd just stop now if I were you ;P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If God is with me, I don't care who opposes me. I have no offense to the post. None. I just disagree. I take offense at all the ignorant people spewing lies. That's just me. I'm calm, though. Don't start assuming stuff.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Alrighty then, if you say so. But, 'all the ignorant people spewing lies'? Is that what you saw? Because all I saw was people expressing their opinions and trying to prove a point to someone who clearly can't take a joke. Meh, maybe that's just me.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

By spewing lies I mean regurgitating what they were taught in school. They aren't liars, they are wrong. I can take a joke. I just disagree with it. They are 'ignorant' of the truth. Most can't hold their argument, which is why I'm only arguing with two people, rather than about 15.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are just as ignorant and spewing just as many evidenceless lies.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Bah. Haven't I held my arguments tenaciously? Yes? That's because I can back mine up. Most can't.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

if you really dont care who oposes you, why are you here arguing?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

To back mine up. Seriously, try to be logical.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Darwin's finches. There's your evidence right there.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There is a fundamental difference between "microevolution" or "adaptation," and macroevolution. Adaptation, like the finches, happens. And yes, the finches do look different. But they can still breed together. They are the same species. A small beak can still mate with a large beak and produce fertile offspring. They are the same species. That, in no way, constitutes a new species. In any case, they are almost identical. No one group is anatomically better than the other. If one were, then that would rule the island and all the other died out. They simply adapted to their conditions.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i'm pretty sure adaption is a fundamental part of evolution

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, because it's practically the only evidence for it, and afterwards they go on to explain it through some illogical method. Adaptation happens. That doesn't make new animals. It makes better, more streamlined animals best fit for their environment.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That's how evolution happens. survival of the fittest. species won't give birth to other species, rather, it takes millions of years for species to develop. what else do you think happened for the 4 billion years or so life has occurred on earth?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Stop right there. "Species won't give birth to other species." You then go on to refute that. You forgot a word, 'instantly.' Continue. You still haven't given any evidence that the streamlined, adapted animals create new species. Someone posted something saying how bunnies who have longer legs are faster, etc, and then their offspring will be faster, etc., so that makes all rabbits better. Yes, that is true, and that is adaptation. But that wasn't an example of 'macro-evolution.' To this date, I have never seen an example of macro-evolution. Not once. There is simply no evidence at all for it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay then. Give me a piece of solid evidence that evolution didn't happen. And no, passages from the Bible don't count as solid evidence.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hello. I just wanted to say. Get your ass off the internet. I think it's stupid that you would go so far to defend your beliefs on a website like this. No one is ever going to agree with you. Why bother? You're wasting your time and ours. Believe whatever the hell you want, but stop trying to cram it down everyone else's throats. That's why America has freedom of religion, so we won't have to listen to whackjobs like you. I also wanted to ask, do you attend church at Westboro Baptist? Because your ignorance of how the Bible is supposed to be adapted to fit modern times amazes me. Never should it be taken literally. And as a departing thought, I am not an atheist, or agnostic, or whatever. I'm a Lutheran, however I don't favor Creationism over Evolution or visa versa. I think the two theories can exist in harmony, as neither one will EVER be proven. Which brings us back to my main point. This'll never be resolved. So shut up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Your argument consists of nothing. I'm not the one cramming lies down the students' throats; the textbooks in the school are full of lies. Lies supporting evolution. Where in the Bible does it say don't take it literally? Nowhere? Hmm, did you just make that up (or someone) to explain away some things. Very smart. Claiming you know more than God.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Dear lord, there is no reasoning with you. >.< You can't prove one theory over another, so I wouldn't refer to either as "lies." When you find a way to prove Creationism is valid, come talk to me. And no, the Bible does not count as a legitimate source. Also, it never says in the Bible not to take it literally. I never said it did. HOWEVER, the Bible has a lot of rules and such that people nowadays do not follow, for they just don't make sense. The Bible says you can own a slave as long as it's foreign. Do you own a Canadian? I didn't think so. I do not claim I know more than God, I am just saying there is no way to prove one theory over the other, and that the Bible was written as a code of conduct, however due to the passing of time, it has become outdated and things in it need to be adjusted to fit the modern day scenario.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I cannot believe that you believe the nonsense you just typed. I didn't say the entirety of evolution theory is lies, I said that some of the more 'convincing' parts of it happen to be misleading evidence. Like the half bird reptile thing. I don't know where it says you can own a slave, but that doesn't mean you HAVE to own a slave. You understand? It's like saying you CAN eat vegetables, but that doesn't mean you SHOULDN'T eat meat. Get it? Also, the Bible was written to be taken literally. That being said, there are things to take metaphorically, such as parables and the like. Genesis was written as a historical narrative, and we should interpret it thusly. The Bible isn't just a "code of conduct," rather, it's an entire history of man, complete from the beginning, to the end of the world. When I say "complete" I don't mean that everything is written down; that'd be impossible. I mean that it is accurate, and NOT outdated.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I give up. There is absolutely no way to get you to open your eyes a bit wider and see more than you're comfortable with. I can say so many things, like, "Do you actually have friends?" etc, but I don't want to be immature about this. Religion is something that different people take different ways. According to you, my view on Christianity and the Bible is wrong. According to me, my church, my pastor, and probably God, it's just fine. I have faith, I believe Jesus died for us, and that God is watching over everyone. Maybe I'm not so technical and I don't go by the book (haha, pun), but I consider myself a Christian all the same. You have no right to tell other people on here what's right and what's wrong, for they too are allowed to believe what they want. And as I stated below, I would quit getting so up in arms about a normally funny meme, and get yourself a sense of humor. I'm done with this.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

NOW you're on my side once you realize that your argument was invalid. Whatever, do what you will.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Excuse me? Did I say I was on your side? Because I missed that. Actually, I recall saying I was on no one's side, and that religion is a free for all, and arguing over a meme was stupid. But somehow you found in the subtext that I agree with you. I really don't, hate to burst your bubble.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

As a final thought, I'm not on either "side" in this argument. I believe both theories are plausible and could be valid. The truth could even be a combination of the two. But, until we find tell-all scientific evidence, or a prophet who isn't a mentally unhinged homeless man, we're at a stalemate. As a result, I don't see any point in arguing about all this on the internet, for it's not proving anything, or changing anyone's perspective. It's just getting people mad. I find it even more ridiculous that such a debate was sparked by a post that was meant to be a joke. It's not seriously doubting God or the Bible or anything. It's a joke. Like, ha-ha. So learn to laugh, or get off the internet. Good day.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If it helps, http://www.amirite.net/48446 You've done a great job of holding to the Christian beliefs, but if you want encouragement/reference you can use that post's comments. God Bless all of you. Peace out.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Dude thank you. That post is amazing. And I cannot believe that 1200 people disagreed with it; it's undeniable.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

At least we can prove our "higher power" (scientists) actually exist. But eh, whatever floats your boat.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, but that doesn't make them right, now does it?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Very true, but I honestly don't think anyone can claim they know exactly how creation began, whether its coming from an Evolutionist or Creationist.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, but there are some good theories. Big Bang is pretty logical, but it still needs a cause to set it off. That's where an all-powerful, timeless Being comes in.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(@everyone here) Ok, you're arguing religion here. When we fight like this, no one can win. Everyone's stance is a differant religious opinion, thus, no one is right or wrong. No one will know any of this until we die, so it's stupid to fight. Everyone is going to hug and makeup, because we are all good people here!!!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Maybe science and religion can coexist, then, because like mlpanda said, no one will probably ever totally agree. Even in the case of Evolution vs. Creation, the initial act of the universe itself being created (by God, as you believe) could be followed by evolution. Anywayys, I doubt it'll do any good continuing the debate.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Pics of evolution or it didn't happen"? Genetic evidence and fossils~ But this post was seriously a joke. Calm down.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@509777 (Katffro): This has to be one of the most longest conversations in amirite history

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(Crayons,crayons....): That's why I didn't read it all :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Haha amazing post :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

In this thread: Butthurt Jesus-freaks defend their giant rule book by being "disappointed" in us nonbelievers.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Please don't group all Christians together into one big, ignorant group. That guy arguing with you is a fool, but not all Christians are like that.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This I know, my friend. But I enjoy making him look like an ass. Don't worry. This trollololo lololo lololo is never srs.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ah, I see. Just wanted to make sure you knew that. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Very true. Take Eminem for example. :) He's a Christian, though you might not think so...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ah, I had no idea he was a Christian. That's cool. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes please, we're not all crazy, I can assure you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Just laugh about it and shut up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There is proof of evolution with fossils. But pictures weren't invented during bible times, sorry. That's why there's art. You are a sad fool if you thought this post was really clever : )

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I just drew my cat with three heads. That must mean my cat has three heads in real life, right??

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(Your+name+(optional)): When people say "pictures" they mean "photographic evidence". So no, drawing doesn't count. :) ...Wait, I just realized this was a sarcastic reply to the post above you. I should pay more attention... :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Way to state the point of the JOKE and still not get it. You are a sad fool if you thought your comment was really clever.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Evolution can never truly be scientifically PROVEN because true scientific proof requires Observation (as per the Scientific Method). And no one can observe evolution because it takes too long and they would be dead by the time anything happened with it, and there was no one there to observe evolution when it first started happening (cause it's Evolution). Likewise, Creationism cannot be proven either because there weren't any people there to witness the creation of the world. Both require a belief; faith to an extent. Stop arguing over it, no one is going to suddenly pull out a whammy that convinces the other people in this post that what they're saying is right, so there's no point in arguing.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh but it's so fun to egg them on.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I have to agree. lol. It's so easy to get most anyone worked up on the internet.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

^^ Why I have fun being a troll.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

...You're a troll? I thought you were serious, I'm so disillusioned! :(

by Anonymous 13 years ago

LOL. I'm going to mention this is religion class and see what happens.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Pics or it never happened.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

lol i believe the Bible is historical fiction, because events and people from the bible have been proven (artifacts have been found), but the Jesus/God/Holy Spirit/Miracles/Devil thing sounds like a crackhead made it up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Are you saying the idea of Jesus as a person in history is false, or just that the idea of a Holy Trinity (Father/Son/Holy Spirit) is whack?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I think she meant the latter.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

the trinity and the other religious shit. do you seriously think this 40 year old virgin was dead for 3 days than magically became alive, and made other people alive? and this old creepy man who lives on a cloud is really writing down every single little thing that billions of people have done? and how we're gonna be hermaphrodites in heaven? give me a break. its worse than Harry Potter or Twilight.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Jesus was 33 when he was crucified. :-p ANd I've never heard of God described as "a creepy old man who lives on a cloud". lol.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Every point of this argument has already been presented at some point or another. Why does it continue? The believers have a calling to share the Gospel. The non-believers like to egg us on and/or shove things in our faces. So what's it about? The people who haven't made up their minds. Non-believers: you've made your decision, but don't hinder us from helping the undecided. Believers: don't go to battle unprepared, and leave the those who have already decided to the fate they have chosen.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Shut up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(Your+name+(optional)): lol, why?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Because your holier than thou bullshit is annoying? Just a guess.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

when did I refer to MYSELF as Holy? But since you brought it up I'll tell you about that. As a being of this world by myself on a scale of 0-100 I am (along with everyone else) a 0. But I have found Jesus. Although I don't always represent him as well as I should, he is in me, and I in him. He makes me 100. He washes me clean and makes me Holy. I don't deserve it but he loves me unconditionally. You brought it up so I'm telling you, He has saved me, and I have been set free.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I vomited a little right there.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

haha. Need some pepto?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

And here is a man who gets the troll. Will wonders never cease? You have my backing, sir.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You had so much logic with your original post. But when you did the whole "Jesus saved me", your credibility died. Let me be the first to inform you: Non-Christians don't want to hear about how Jesus saved your life (speaking as a Christian), especially when you speak about it online, where no one knows you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Cool story, I don't want your conditionally comforted approval of my credibility.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, you are way better at arguments than I.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Are you being sarcastic?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, I'm serious. You keep your composure. I don't. Good job.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Who is to say that the Bible is always right? It's been changed before.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ha, you must be talking about the book of mormon. The only thing changed in my Bible is the language. Yes, there are different translations but they all have the same basic meaning or purpose.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Evolution is real. It's happening, it may not be as quick as a "dog making a new animal such as a fox". But, it's gradual. How else would a dinosaur become a chicken?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Dude, can't you see how you're using circular reasoning? Evolution is happening. How do we know? Dinosaurs become chickens. How do we know this? Because of evolution. Dude, that is your argument. Reread that, and realize how that isn't even saying anything. That's like me saying God created the earth because it exists. Why does it exist? Because he created it. How do we know he created it? Because it exists. That is not my argument; that was an example to show what you are doing.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There's one fatal flaw in your argument. God didn't create the world in 7 days. . . Tia did.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You're right. He made it in six and rested on the seventh. Tia made her Sims world in seven days, or so I've heard.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

mike.. ono

by Anonymous 13 years ago

EVERYONE SHOULD JUST SHUT UP. its a JOKE and i think its FUNNY so enough with the religious arguments.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Darn... I guess George Washington wasn't really are first president

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Good enough?: http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2007/december/the-bible-according-to-google-earth ? Nah, just kidding. I'm a christian, I laughed.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Scrantoncity is a tool. Which is proven because it saus so right here in this comment. Its also proven throughout this entire post :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hmm, I think the one with a profile pic of a nasty troll/ogre lookin thing is the scaredy cat. Why don't you man up kid?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lol. Scrantoncity really is a tool. I saw on another post he wrote about never being invited to parties or anything. I wonder why. Hahaha.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

-Some- Christians belief God created evolution. They believe that some of the Bible is just fables to teach people right from wrong (most of which is in the Old Testement) since it is so close to other religions. And some non-Christians believe that Christianity is a more evolved form of older religions that is still evolving as time goes on.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If neither parents carry the allele for white fur, it is a mutation, not genetics. An example of evolution (evolution, not mutation) that I learned yesterday in anatomy is that long ago people were much shorter than they are now.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If neither parents carry the allele for white fur, it is a mutation, not genetics. An example of evolution (evolution, not mutation) that I learned yesterday in anatomy is that long ago people were much shorter than they are now.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They didn't have cameras in those days. :3

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There weren't any cameras then. Unless I'm missing something: no way.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Way to copy my comment

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@506926 (fangirl12): You are missing something. Pics or it didn't happen is sorta a meme. Like if someone says something spectacular, someone says, pics or stfu, or pcs or it didnt happen. This is referencing that and showing how the bible could possibly just be stories.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Have I mentioned how much I hate memes? They're so stupid. And anything could just be, "stories". Jesus is no less credible than King Henry VIII, Sacajawea, or Squanto.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, half the people saying "Pics weren't invented!" Don't get the meme and the joke.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah so becuase you dont have pics of your great great great great grandparents, you dont exist either.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/pics-or-it-didnt-happen

by Anonymous 13 years ago

see http://www.licoc.org/ACTS/crucifixion_3.jpg

by Anonymous 13 years ago

someone probably built that "cross that jesus died on" like 600 years ago i bet.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hahaha! :D

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Just a joke. Calm down. It's like laughing at a Black joke even though you're Black. It's OK.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

*sigh* arguing over the internet is like running in the special olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh lawl, here comes the debate. Srsly, people, it is a joke, let it go.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

We were monkeys. God doesn't exist. This is funny. The end. Lul.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The post was amazing, but the comments really brought this post to another level.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This is weird. All the posts are dated at Aug 29, but my computer promises me its Aug 28.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

meh, I don't agree with it, but I suppose it's all in good humor, so whatever! Except this is a POD, so it's going to have at least 5000 more comments. ugh.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It seems that the ones who disagreed and are arguing on here are the ones who aren't that secure in their faith.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

smirk for the lulz.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i'll go buy you one from the dollar store. You can even color some of the pictures! :) i voted down cuz i'm Christian, but this is funny.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The things I've learned from this post: Christians have no humor and today's youth scares the SHIT out of me. For all of you religious people, admit it, if this was a post with evolution in it instead of the bible, you'd be telling everyone who argued with it to take a joke. So just let it go you guys. The sun is shining, it's another day in this beautiful world, and it's passing you by. So go have a glass of lemonade and ENJOY this day instead of arguing with each other.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

http://www.amirite.net/319688 yeah people don't seem to be as ROFL at that.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well no shit people aren't laughing at that, it's not original. Honestly, if that post was before this one, I would have laughed at it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

scrantoncity, it's really vile of you to say that if you're gay then as a result you're going to hell. I feel like God should smack you in the face.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

http://showna.deviantart.com/art/God-Blessed-Me-With-A-Gay-Son-34610307

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Evolution can't be real since it conflicts with the 2bd law of thermodynamics" all things move to entropy ( disorder) so evolutionists aren't really scientific at all

by Anonymous 13 years ago

how about everyone just chills. we are never gonna agree.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

NO pictures of the mayflower coming to america and being here? Did it happen? im pretty sure it did

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm not O.o

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You guys argue over the little things in religion but ignore the biggest part of any religion: being a good person.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hi, my name is Saint Isaac. I'm not religious, though slightly faithful. If you've read down to this, you probably think all Christians are insane. Well, you're probably right. But, I believe in the Bible's... ermm... stuff. And I would like to tell you that I am not crazy. Revel if you wish, for those like me are few.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ok, i was reading this, but i couldn't finish it because it was getting so ridiculous. here's what i think about the bible and such, and i know a lot of people who think the same way. I am not denying that the people, and a lot of events, in the bible are true. however, the events such as the burning bush or moses parting the sea, i seriously do not believe happened. there havent been a lot of cases of things like that happening, and there aren't really was it could ever happen. evolution, i find easier to believe. there is a lot of proof that it happened/is happening. i dont know if others see it this way, but thats how i do.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the chimpanzee is people’s closest relative. Yet regarding this we must observe the following: ‘Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Cholesterol level tests indicate that the garter snake is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man’s closest relative.’ ‘On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man’s closest relative",Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It sickens me that people would rather keep arguing than take the advice of all of the posts that say, "let's drop it, no one will ever agree" and "let's enjoy this day instead of argue on the Internet". Pick your battles people. If you REALLY want to change someone's mind and that's what this has all been about, then go door-to-door or start up something in your own community rather than insult your peers over the Internet.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i only got through like.. 150 comments then got tired.. But to sancroncity, alot of the bibe is a metaphor, even priests have told me so. If god created the world in 6 days, as you said, which day were the dinosaurs? And how did they live for millions of years if just a few days after earth's creation humans were born? And also, on gays, they say god makes everyone the way they are meant to be and we should all love thy neighbour like we love ourselves, so then if god MAKES people he makes them gay. It's not their choice. but then he says it's wrong? So he makes someone destined for hell unless what? Unless they say 'god i'm sorry you made me this way, let me repent for something you did to me' That's bs. We should all realise we are made the way we are forson, people are born gay, it's not a choice and they shouldn't have to deny who they are for your stupid christian ignorance. so up yours, you're so wrapped up in the bible you miss the most important bits. Goodbye.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Good god, I think I love you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

amen to that.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

oops, forson should've said * for a reason. Stupid phone. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ok haha I get the joke but the reason the Christians are arguing it is not because they are insulted they just want to prove the point that this isn't a sound argument and by people arguing back it just makes it worse

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Neither the theory of evolution nor the beliefs of creationism are infallible. There's really not much use arguing because neither side will concede the other's point or change their set-in-stone minds. Can we settle at that?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

In other words, agree to disagree.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Some people really need to calm down and respect other's beliefs. Not the OP, I thought the joke was funny, but everyone commenting.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh boy, the word 'bible' only mentioned once and now people are arguing and can't just laugh at the OP itself. Who didn't see that coming?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I love how so many people are taking this seriously! :D It's a joke people, lighten up. Almost NOTHING on this site is serious!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ahh jokes, no one can take them anymore

by Anonymous 13 years ago

^ Holy shit (no pun intended), I think that is the longest Jesus debate I've seen on here in a while. Damn.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's fun to read this while being Jewish.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

When I don't measure up to much in this life, I'm a treasure in the arms of Christ :) may God bless all of you :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They didnt have cameras back then LOL.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

this is idiotic why do people have to post controversial things i think people should just stop trying to cause arguments on amirite i understand stating your VALID opinion but one as invalid and jsut pointless as this...just leave it out and plus PoTD really?!?!?!?!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

flame wars are awesome

by Anonymous 13 years ago

AAAH! 666 NO WAYS! IT'S AN OMEN! Oh, never mind, another oversensitive atheist downvoted it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

blahblahblah. if you're going to take a post like this seriously and argue about it, get outta here. this is the wrong site for you

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's going to be hilarious when, after "a few years", there's still no "rapture" (one of the stupidest ideas espoused in the bible, btw... I mean, come on) and the poor unlaid loser behind scrantoncity will either be so disillusioned that he turns the other way, or be forced to just keep saying "a few more years... a few more years and you'll see iamrite..." until he gets old and senile. I'm sure you'll find lots of dotty old codgers to debate religion with at the funeral home. Regardless of how little evidence you think scientists have, at least they have something. Fossil records, and it's obvious from looking at ancient buildings that people have gotten much taller over the centuries... what do we call that? What do we call mammoths shedding all that hair that was uneeded after the ice age and becoming elephants? As a matter of fact... fossil record proves the bible wrong, because the bible says people came right along with all the animals(some of which didn't even e...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I love these kinds of posts, the comments make up for the fact that this is far from original. Anyhow, God is a lie, religion is a lie, your sub-conscience isn't really the holy ghost. Please pop that prehistoric bubble you keep your mind in.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Refer to my post: "REligious debates never turn out well" woot called it

by Anonymous 13 years ago

... exist that long ago), and yet fossil record proves that there were animals on this planet for millenia before people. Religion comes down to: a way to explain the unexplainable, and a list of rules for living(most of which are common sense). If it makes you a better person, great- if it makes you a sanctimonious, narrow-minded pain in the ass, then stfu seriously. I don't need promise of otherworldly reward *or* threat of otherworldly reprisal to be a good person who doesn't hurt and tries to help others. Lots of us don't need an excuse or a push for such simple decency. It's sad that so many still do, otherwise religion would be even more out of favor than it already is. Sure, you see lots of "christian" kids on this site... but I bet before 30 at least half of them will have grown out of it. The conditioning and brainwashing of parents only lasts so long.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Cause they're actually were cameras at that time to have some pics -_-

by Anonymous 13 years ago

hai guiz wuts goin on in dis thread? "RAHRAHARHARHAR EVOLUTION DEBATE!! RAHARHAR" Oh.... Um... *Sidesteps out of camera*

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ಠ_ಠ

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Pics or it didn't happen.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Scrantoncity likes satan's dick.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I love comment threads that remind me how much I hate people.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Brilliant post. Totally agree.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Greenleader, you comment restored my faith in humanity.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I lol to all you people for having a debate on a amirite post

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@sancroncity. love how you didn't fight back about my very valid point about god purposely damning gays. Cool. ignorant ass.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Did God have a first day? If so, what was before that?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Mary was a whore. She was balls deep in Joseph, but he had a tiny penis, so she cheated on him with a black guy. (because they have huge penises) Then Jesus was born. As he grew up, him and David fought 3 headed lions together and went camping in whales stomachs, like every other weekend. One night while they were chillin in the whales stomach, they both got bi-curious, and tried "things," and they liked it. But no one approved of it, so David and Jesus were never allowed to see each other again....This is a FACT....no seriously, I put "Bible" on the cover.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Through this post we've got an other agressive Religion, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@anonyMouse thank you? Haha

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i dont get it?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Actually, the 6 days the world was created in, that was gods time; which is about 6000 years here :O Also dinosaurs could have existed and been wiped out while Adam and eve were in the garden, they were immortal; who knows how long they were in that garden for before the fall happened? 6 years? 6 million years?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lol, you guys who are arguing about religion are morons. Everyone knows that every single argument is the same; Both sides thinking they're right, both sides defending and attacking while getting angrier and angrier, and then eventually it ends, but neither side has any change whatsoever in their opinion. -_-?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, except camera's weren't invented for another couple hundred years. Lmao.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Whoa controversial post! And false btw, just saying!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

omg you guys its just a post! get over it :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Pics? hi. there was no cameras back then. and drawings really wouldnt survive 2000 years.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

thats exactly what i was thinking...... cameras werent around.... anddd.... how would they even make it this far if they even had pictures. why the hell is this the post of the day....

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's a joke, and a meme which you don't seem to get... (:

by Anonymous 13 years ago

hahah.ovbiously not.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh, god's little fan club. This was extremely entertaining.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If anyone gets down this far, it was a joke so be quiet

by Anonymous 13 years ago

And you disagreed with the post because?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I like chocolate milk! :D

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Win

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm full of win.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Someone's full of themselves.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

and also win. hahah ;)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm a Christian, and it didn't offend me. People get too sensitive

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Reading these comments were very entertaining!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

EVERYBODY NEEDS TO CALM THE FUCK DOWN

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Religion is just an excuse. You get nothing out of it. Period. (PS don't give me a load of 'christ himself will punish you' because if he will, he would've done so by now)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You're entitled to your own opinion. No one should bash you because you don't believe in what they do.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Sorry, i really didn't mean to sound so ostentatious.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You actually didn't to me, I was just saying because I can relate. The only thing I believe in is God and the rest isn't that believable to me lol.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

so this post is hilarious, but the arguments in the comments are even better pahhahahaha

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Do you believe that wind exists? Can you see it? Nope. Can you feel it's presence? Yes. Can you see the effects of what it can do? Yup. the same thing goes for God. He's all around you. He's present and He loves you. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Do you believe that God exists? Yes. Can you see it? Nope. Can you feel its presence? Well, you can't see it, so you don't know what that presence is. You can't just automatically assume it's God. Maybe it's fucking Zeus for all you know. Can you hear it? Sure, if you're insane. Can you smell it? No. Can you taste it? No. This is not the first time I've heard this poorly presented argument. And I'm really sick of it. Create something original.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

And now I remember why I'm not pro-life.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm a christian and I would like to point out that we are not all ignorant assholes like SOME people. *cough* scrantoncity *cough*

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i just feel bad for whoever posted this. "there are 400+ comments on a post which you created."

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i like cheese

by Anonymous 13 years ago

PEOPLE WHO DISAGREED: You know there's no pictures, you can't take a joke, instead of facing the problem head on, you try to convert people with meaningless nonsense. So you have extreme butthurt, extreme stupidity, and an extreme case of "I'M ALWAYS RIGHT SO THAT MEANS YOU'RE WRONG!!!! WAHHHH." Just fucking face it already, there's no proof. I don't give a damn if you believe or not, I give a damn when you try to create false facts just so other people can believe your bullshit. Accept it or get the fuck off of Earth, because you're making us look even stupider. And yes, that is a word.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If the Bible isnt true (which it is) how did we get here? The Big Bang Theroy? No. Jesus Chirst created us in HIS image. And if you believe in him you dont need proof! You have to have Faith that its true! No matter what you say about the Bible or how you dont believe in Jesus,Jesus Loves You.Forever and Always

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(Jessie!!): You suck at logic. Evolution. HERP DERP. The Big Bang Theory is just that. A THEORY. And you know what your religion is? A THEORY, HURRRRRR. How old are you, 11? I understand. You're just another blind following sheep who isn't mature enough to question what they believe in. It's OK, just come back to me when you actually have legitimate proof to support yourself. Also, I don't believe in Jesus Christ, Yahweh (your deity, and deity means god, so "the Lord" I s'pose you'd say is really called Yahweh), or the Holy Spirit. Your argument is incredibly invalid.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If one person belives in a magic and can hear voices in his head etc you call him crazy, if loads of people do the same, you call it a religion

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I don't see why everyone's making such a big deal out of this. I believe in a God, and I found it very amusing. Stop being so uptight. It's just a light-hearted joke.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Exactly. Who's to say God doesn't have a sense of humor?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You have a good point. I don't even know why I'm writing this, because there are so many comments that no one will care :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Nahhh, it's the fact everyone is reading the bitch-fest going on with that scrantoncity-person.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes! I mean, look at the platypus and tell me with a straight face that God doesn't have a sense of humor. :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I hate people who want to turn me into a Christian. Saying that "THE BIBLE IS PROOF SO HOW CAN YOU NOT BELIEVE?" It's stupid. Wanna know the best way to help me turn into a Christian? Don't do crap.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I don't see how evolutionists are bypassing other science to make their theory seem right( no I'm not creationist I think the theroies can co exist)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I PREFER SMOOTH PEANUT BUTTER!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This isn't MLIA. Say something relevant.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Everything people think is a fact is only supported by theories. Everything is a theory cause the only thing you can prove is that you exist. The saying "I think therefore I am". So religion, scientific crap and what not is all up to the individual. The only reason I chose to follow Christainity is that the evolution theory says you cease to exist afterwards so why not be optomistic. Other than that it really doesn't matter what others think because as one of the earlier posts said (That I read 2 hours ago, u guys seriously post a lot of long posts) that at the end of the day its all the same to all of us. So please lets end this ridiculous post comments thread NOW!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

To all the people saying thing like, "But they didn't have cameras back then. How were they supposed to take pics?" You make me brain hurt due to your I hate you all.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

STFU, dumbass

by Anonymous 13 years ago

who says all scientists are opposed to religion? they're there to find facts. they question everything. they are on nobodies side except reason. people can't go on saying that they are 'lying to cover up christianity and the bible.' umm.. no. they're looking for proof to all these different theories. i gave up on christianity long ago because i DONT WANT a 'personal, loving relationship' with a dude people seem to think sits in the clouds and has a plan for me. no thank you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Are you really that much if a delusional twat that you really thought she was siding with you? You're such a goddamn imbecile.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I have a question! If we evolved from monkeys where are all the in-between stages? And don't just say they died off, if they died off why didn't the monkeys? I'm sure the in-between stages would have been more capable of surviving than the original monkeys things... Hope that makes sense!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am supposing that you are joking, cause if not you have a serious problem. man didnt evolve from monkey but from homo sapiens(or one of those species i dont remember :) ), monkeys are just our cousins.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I wish I hadn't wasted my time reading this whole thing. I wish A) I had evolved to an intelligence level where I would have realized this was a big waste of time of B) God had blessed me with the inteligence to realize that this would be a big waste of time

by Anonymous 13 years ago

or* (oops) XD

by Anonymous 13 years ago

First off, I am 17, not 12. So what if my spelling abilities aren't the best? You have not backed up your beliefs yet, you've only made fun of people who disagree with you. I never said that there is not a higher power that set off the big bang. No one can answer where the universe came from, but there is evidence to support the Big Bang. The evidence is that the universe is expanding. When something explodes, the explosion expands. That is why scientists believe it is true. Can YOU tell me where the universe came from without using references from the Bible? I highly doubt you could. There is evidence that there is a god, but there is no evidence that it is the god you worship. (Please note that I've been able to respectfully disagree without making fun of you. You should try it sometime. People might like you better then,)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

this was potd on my brithday

by Anonymous 12 years ago