-182 Wouldnt it be better if anorexia only existed in 3rd world countries?? amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Why would that be better?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Because they don't have food, so it'd be better if they didn't want the food anyway. It's better than them wanting the food but not having it.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

because there's more hunger there, so if they had anorexia, they wouldn't need as much food.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wouldn't you hope that it didn't exist at all, in any countries? I wouldn't wish such a terrible thing on other people...amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

your fuckin dumb for that

by Anonymous 13 years ago

fuk ur fuckin dumb mak me puk

by Anonymous 12 years ago

carter, your grammar is beautiful.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Meh. You're both on an equal playing field for grammatical errors.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

No..

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Yes. Given the two options: 1. Anorexia is in every part of the world (as it is now) 2. Anorexia is only in the third world. Given the choice, option 2 must be the right choice. The poster is right.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Hollywood doesn't exist in third-world countries, though...

by Anonymous 12 years ago