If they can move inbetween the burning, and weeping, and gnashing of teeth.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

oh, so you've been there? I mean, you stated what happens, so apparently you've seen it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, God said so.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lol worst reasoning ever.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Nice one : P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So God's been to hell? ...Something about that just doesn't sound right... :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

He's omnipotent, He knows everything. He is also omnipresent.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Dude, I got some bad news for you... God is a lie.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I God some bad news for you, atheists don't get into heaven.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'll be dead by then, I won't feel anything, so I don't care.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You've talked to God?!?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

All queers will fall to such a low and painful level of hell that if a queer knew a moment of the suffering it would get in hell, that wretched slimy creep faggot would turn straight and quit trying to be some kind of rebel and a failure of our species.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

dayummm sonn you got somee hate!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

lol you're calling someone else a "failure of the species"? Get a mirror, dear.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

And some ice for that burn!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

We gon' need some running water for that one.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I really wish people would stop complaining about the gay thing. It's not that big a deal, many christians support gays and there are a million other sins we hate more. Lying, adultery, slander, stealing, hating, greed, selfishness, killing; THOSE are things that concern me as a Christian.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

AGREED.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So, you're ok with some sin? God isn't.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1.)I'm not okay with sin. 2.) I said I wish people would stop freaking out about it. Both how sinful it is and how "evil , stupid and hateful" Christians are for opposing it, even though a lot of non-Christians oppose it. It's only mentioned in the Bible 2 times by my count, Jesus never said anything about it and it doesn't break any of the ten commandments. 3.)You don't see Christians crusading against and protesting liars and jealous people, but those people are blatantly breaking 2 of the ten commandments. Actually, they're breaking in the love thy neighbor commandment by lying and envying them. I'm just saying there are worse things to worry about. Instead of spreading hate to people who already in a world of cruelty, why not focus on loving people no matter what they've done and making the world a better place like Jesus wanted us to do?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I've said it once, I'll say it again. I DON'T HATE GAYS!!! Second, by saying it doesn't matter as much because Jesus didn't say it was a sin (or 10 commandments) you are implying that parts of the Bible are more important than others. Also, Jesus did speak on the matter. ‘For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander,’ (Matthew 15:19) Lastly, I love everyone, but that doesn't mean I'm going to act like their sin is ok. Infact, the most loving thing a Christian can do is warn sinners of danger of not turning to Jesus. Analogy: Who do you think is a more loving mother? A mother who let's a kid do whatever he wants, without telling him of the severe repercusions later in life. Or the mother who Loves her son enough to say, not to abuse their health or something like like that?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Actually, I spoke to a Catholic priest about the entire homosexuality issue versus the Church, and he's actually written a paper about the whole issue while he was a temporary deacon...so he's got his facts straight. Alright, well according to him and sources from the Vatican II documents, Christians aren't suppose to shun homosexuals. Its not a Christian thing to do to condemn people because we aren't God. He told me that we should actually try to understand them. Imagine trying to NOT like the opposite gender. Its quite difficult isn't it? Even though we shouldn't have anything against homosexuals, the only thing that bothers the Catholic Church is homosexual intercourse because its against pro life. And any action that is against pro life is, by their definition, a sin. I hope you understand what I'm trying to say.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So... a preist knows everything about the Bible, and know exactly how God wants us to feel about gays, even though he already told us how to feel about them? Ok, makes perfect sense.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I mean, leave it best to someone who thinks "wwjd" like 24/7. He's not saying he knows exactly how God wants us to feel about gays. All I'm saying is that I agree with the priest. We really shouldn't judge others. Jesus Christ never came down on earth to point fingers saying, "you're going to go to hell, and you're going to go to hell, and you're DEFINITELY going to go to hell.." Jesus Christ came down to tell us to "Love thy neighbor as thy self. " I truly believe that we have absolutely no authority or power to condemn. Because condemning someone is already a sin in itself. Its a prideful and unhumble action. Like I said before, we are not God.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Acually, Jesus called us to judge them rightously. I know how God feels about gays because of what He put in the Bible. And I will always take what the Bible says over some priest's opinion.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The Bible specifically lists homosexual intercourse as a sin 2 times by my count. It says far more than that many times not to judge people. It's God's job to judge people, not our own. And you condemn this priest because you say he is claiming to know exactly what God intended. Well, aren't you doing that? Aren't YOU telling us that you know exactly what God wants us to do and how to feel about this? You are not God.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There we go, Jesus said to judge people, rightiously. John 7:24 (New American Standard Bible)  24"Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment." And second, no i'm not, I am telling you what God said.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Does that still me we should condemn them? Does that still mean we should hurt them? If you truly love God wouldn't you rather spend your time preaching his love and good will rather than all the bad things you think people are doing?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

When did I condemn them? I am against people who bully gays, or anyone for that matter. I'm not calling for a uprising to kill all the gay people. Anybody who loved God would rather say "You are sinning! If you don't turn away from your sin and repent you will go to hell" if they preached this, people would turn away from sin, and believe in Jesus. If they just say "God loves you." they are basiclly saying, I don't want to make you feel bad that you're sinning, so I'll just let you go to hell without telling you how you can go to heaven. Lastly, it's not "what I think they're doing". It's what the Bible said was wrong.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I am saying that some parts are more important, only because they were stressed so much more and repeated so often. The sins of anger, adultery, hatred, idolitry, greed, selfishness, disrespect were all mentioned several times and emphasized by many prophets. Again, homosexuality was only named twice as a sin in the entire Bible. Do you also believe that we should stone pagans and adultresses? And seriously, it would be one thing if being gay was a choice, but it's not. If it was, I would be against it, but you just can't help it. Pardon my bluntness, but try getting a hard on to another guy. You can't. You can't just choose who you have feelings for. You don't choose who turns you on and who doesn't. It doesn't work like that. Now pedophiles and furries might say the same thing, but the ones they have feelings for aren't emotionally or mentally capable of true love for another human being, but other consenting adults are.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

By saying certain parts are more important because they were repeated is like saying "The Laws say murder is wrong only 1 time, so it's ok to muder, but it said 12 times that you shouldn't litter, so I shouldn't litter." And what proof do you have that being gay is not a choice?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay: TRY being gay. TRY getting a hard on for a certain person. You can't. It's just natural. And why would you choose that? Choose to never be able to have children, choose to be hated and ridiculed, choose to never be able to marry, and many are christians so they believe it's bad, that it's a sin, and they know how badly their friends family and congregation will treat them if they're gay. Why would they choose that? Some people feel like it's a bonus to never have kids or have to get married, but most don't like it. Why would you choose something so horrible?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Just because somebody does something that is hard/difficult, doesn't mean that they had no choice, and they were meant to be that way. Give me some one reason (other than "Why would they choose to be that way?") that being gay is not a choice.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Again: Can you control when you do or do not get an erection? If the answer is no, then you've just answered your own question. People who really are gay just don't get turned on by the opposite sex in any way whatsoever. They can't help it they just don't. Sex is my biggest thing honestly, because I think we can control who we fall in love with to some extent but if you're already in lvoe with them it's beyond painful to let go. But sex is a biological thing, you can't control it. If you're just not turned on by the opposite sex, then what are you supposed to do? Never fall in love? Can't you imagine what it would be like if you weren't allowed to be in love ever in your life without ever getting a say in it? If it's temptation from satan, why don't we all feel that way? Wouldn't satan try to get us all to fall into sin that way? Why would God choose only these people to never be allowed to love without ever giving them a chance? Why would God only have a...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That is not a real reason. Give me even one reason being gay is not a choice. And even if it was a choice, (which it's not) being born "that way" doesn't mean you can sin.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

For the last time:You can't. Control. Your erections. You get an erection when you're turned on and if you can't control when you get an erection that means you can't control who you have feelings for. It's not just that they get erections with other men, it's that they CAN'T get erections with women. They just can't do it. "And even if it was a choice, (which it's not) being born "that way" doesn't mean you can sin." um... This sentence makes me feel like you made a typo or something, it's kind of unclear.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So, men with erectile disfunction can't love anyone? And what I mean was even if they were "born that way" it doesn't mean they can sin.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I mean that if you are perfectly capable of gettting an erection with other men but are completely incapable of getting an erection with a woman at all, you're gay. It doesn't mean that being gay is a sin. The Bible says a lot of things. It says to stone a woman if she is not a virgin when she is married. It says that we are required by law to wear 4 tassles on all our clothing and it says that we must not boil a goat in it's mother's milk. And why should you focus so much on this sin(if it was a sin)? Why don't people rally against lying and disrespecting ones parents? Yes, they are more important than not being gay by the way, because I don't see any negative reprecussions of being gay at all. Lying causes hate and promotes greed and disrespect and mistrust. We need to love others so that we can all live better happier lives. Sexual immorality such as cheating are cruel to the spouse of the one who cheats, but who is suffering because of homosexuality?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Who is suffering?" that's like saying "Sure, I go 80 mph down the free way, but I never hurt anyone. So it's all good."

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay, that's just ridiculous. You're not very good at comparisons. Think about it instead of just saying the first thing that comes to mind: If someone's going 80mph there's a highly likely chance someone will end up dead. There is no greater chance that a gay person will die than a straight person as long as they are treated the same way. Again: Who is suffering?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

What if you only go 5 miles over the speed limit? Most people speed a little anyway, so it's fine right? No, you are still breaking the law.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No cop is going to care if you go 5 miles over the limit. Now answer my question. This isn't about traffic, this is about being gay. Now:Who is suffering?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Maybe some cops, but cops who care about the law more than their paycheck would. Obviously this isn't about traffic, it was an analogy. On to your question. Who's it hurting? Did you know that gay people aren't aloud to give blood because it's such a health risk. If someone gave blood and didn't say they were gay because the were "in the closet" countless people could get horrible diseases. Second, why does it matter if it hurts anyone, a sin is a sin. Never did the Bible say "it's ok to sin as long as you don't hurt anyone."

by Anonymous 13 years ago

All forms of sin hurt people though. Every single sin hurts someone in one way or another. Not loving God hurts God and the person themselves because they won't have a relationship with God and all other sins hurt people. This one doesn't have any explaination, rhyme or reasoning behind it. Give me a sin, I'll tell you how it hurts people. This though; I can't see how it hurts people. And gay people can give blood; just not if they have an STD, which aren't uncommon in the gay community. They would test the blood for any traces of disease before giving it to someone who needs it. Try an argument that actually works.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You just killed your own argument. You said "All forms of sin hurt people though." The Bible said being gay was a sin, and you said all sin hurts people. You are being hipocritical by saying "Who did they hurt" when being gay is a sin, which you said hurt at least one person.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I did not contradict myself, because being gay is not a sin. If it was a sin, it would hurt people or God. Who is it hurting? How does being gay hurt anyone?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The Bible says it's a sin.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Only TWICE. And Jesus says sexually immorality is bad, but he doesn't mention homosexuality specifically. It also says it is a sin to boil a goat in it's mothers milk and that we must wear four tassles at all times and that woman must never wear men's clothing, which means I can't wear pants. Why would God punish someone for doing something that isn't bad? And do you expect the Bible to be absolutely perfect after more than a thousand years? God doesn't just randomly decide some things are wrong, there is a reason for everything.Again:Who is it hurting? What makes it wrong?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. It still says it twice, which is more than enough to be important. 2. Give me the references to those verses. 3. Saying the Bible won't be as perfect in 1000 years (it was 2000 actaully) is like saying "Even though God know everything that is ever going to happen He couldn't tell that I 2000 years being gay would be acceptable." God can see everthing that's ever going to happen, I think He would have planned ahead.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1.)Congradulations. By agreeing that only twice is good enough you have made it illegal for me to wear my pants, because that would be cross dressing, which is against the laws of the Bible. 2.)Leviticus and Romans 1. The person who called it a sin in Romans 1 was Jesus' disciple, but not really a prophet, so they were just repeating the law layed down by the first guy. 3.)I mean it could have had some things lost in translation over the past few milenium. And it's actually been around longer than 2000 years(the old testament anyway.) The older scriptures have been around a lot longer, and it originally wasn't one book, it was usually smaller books and scrolls, I don't know who combined these specific books into the one volume, but with all the scriptures we may have forgotten, isn't it possible that a few words got messed up along the way, or something?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. They didn't have pants in Biblical times! Even if they did, they have women's pants. Pants are not just for guys. 2. I just read all of Romans 1 and it said nothing about baby goat milk. Or any of the other things you mentioned. 3. Firstly, ever heard of the Dead Sea Scrolls? They found the some original copies of the Bible (Written on stine tablets) and they re-translated them. There wasn't any mistakes. Second, why is it more reasonable to assume something got lost in translation than to take the Bible as infailible? Third, you not taking parts of the Bible, which is a sin, just proves that you aren't fully devoted to Jesus. You are just throwing away parts of the Bible because you want to be accepted. If homosexuality wasn't socially acceptable, I bet you nobody would be claiming it was lost in tranlation.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1.)The baby goat and milk thing was in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. you just asked wherte it said the gay stuff. 2.)I was just giving a second reason as to why it might be wrong because you seem to be ignoring the fact that it hurts no one as I have pointed out before. 3.)Don't you EVER tell me I don't love Jesus enough. You don't even know me. You can't judge people, you especially can't judge people you do not know. The right to judge is God's and God's alone. I don't believe in that particular part of the Bible because all his other laws have rhyme and reason or some form of explanation. There is someone getting hurt mentally, physically or emotionally because of all the other things God indicates as sins. I see no one getting hurt directly by homosexuality anymore than they are hurt by heterosexual relationships.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. That had nothing to do with pants. 2. Can I have the verse #? I don't want to read like 4 chapters right now. 3. The right to judge is God's and God's only? That's exaclty what Jesus taught, NOT! John 7:24 (New American Standard Bible)  24"Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment." Furthermore, the Bible says it's a sin to take away from the Bible. Revelations 22: 19And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. "God shall take his name out of the book of life" this means if one takes away from the Bible, they will not be granted entrance into Heaven. Lastly, here are some facts about homosexuals Homosexuals commit between 33% and 50% of all recorded instances of child molestation. Homosexual teachers have been involved in 80% of re...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But that means 77% - 50% of all heterosexuals committed those same exact crimes. Sorry, but I'm tired and don't feel like it. You can't blame me for that, because you used the same excuse. Try looking it up when you have the time. And judging people? Here's more that disproves what you said: Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you (Matthew 7:12). “But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you, or of man's judgment: yea, I judge not mine own self.” “They are waxen fat, they shine: yea, they overpass the deeds of the wicked: they judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, yet they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not judge.” To me, the last two are a little vague, but the first one is clear. Leave the judging to God. He has better sense than you or me.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes, but homosexuals only make up (off the top of my head) 5% of the population. So 5% of the people are comitting 50% of the crime. "For the same way you judge other, so wi you be judged". I am judging you using the Bible as a ruler. The same way God will judge me. God calls us to judge rightiously (using the Bible as a ruler) which is what I am doing. Never have I thrown my opinions in here.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So saying I don't love God enoguh was your oh so righteuos judgement? Saying that noe one deserves love if they love differently than you is how you judge the world? Look, I'll give you some advice: You can't convince people that loving someone is wrong. It goes against all logic in the Bible. Too bad for you, love is at the core of homosexuality and no one wants to break apart true love. If you want people to stop sinning, tell them of God's love and the other laws he teaches that don't make them feel hated. No one will listen to you telling people how to run their lives, but if you can teach tehm about God's love they might change themselves for Him, not you. Got it?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

When did I say they don't deserve to be loved? And Christians shouldn't be ashamed of God. How does it go against the Bible's logic? That statment is illogical. If a math book says "2 + 2 = 4" normal people will assume that 2 + 2 = 4. We won't assume there is some deep spiritual meaning beheind it. If the Bible meant something else it would say it what it meannt. Not put it some cryptic speak for humans to decypher. One thing about "Gays aren't hurting anyone." They are obviously hurting God. He told them not to do it, and they disobey Him. God didn't have a reason not to covet, He said not to, people don't question it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

When did I say Christians should be ashamed of God? And it contradicts the most important and most emphasized rule in the Bible that supports all reason and rhyme behind God's mercy & sacrifice: Love. The Basis of all Christian lessons is love. Christ said the two most important commandments were to love God and to love thy neighbor. If you go around yelling at people for being gay and telling them they're going to hell for it, they are going to associate God and Christians with your anger at them. If they love God and if it truly is a sin, then they will turn from their sin once they've found him. Instead of being counterproductive and making people only resent God by condemning people you don't even know, how about helping them to find God and then they'll hear it straight from Him what's right and what's wrong instead of hearing you yelling at them. Because, I'm telling you, no one hears God's will when you tell them how bad they are. All they hear is you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If you go around telling people God loves them, they will think "OK, God loves me so I'm fine, I don't have to repent.". As I've said before, the most loving thing you can do is warn people of the danger of not turning from sin.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay, you have no faith. God DOES love them, even sinners. God loves all of us no matter what we've done & the Bible says this over & over. We are all sinners, even you. You're missing the point. If you tell people that they are sinning, why should they care? If they think God doesn't love them right off the bat, why would they care if they're doing something that hurts Him? You have to know and everyone has to know that God loves us. That's why Jesus died for us. He died for all of us- not the perfect people, the sinners. There are no perfect people, no one is free of sin. If you tell people about God's love then they'll actually care if they are sinning. If you call someone a sinner who is going to hell if they don't repent you are making them resent God. If you let people know how much God loves us and what he's done for us, then they'll actually care.Don't you think God cares more about people loving him and you loving them than you condemning strangers?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I never said God did't love them. And I never said I wasn't as sinner. If a bridge is out, and someone on the road says "God loves you!" but doesn't tell me the bridge is down, it's kinda pointless.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Again: YOU NOT GOOD AT COMPARISONS.Listen to me: They won't. Care. If they are sinning, when all you're telling them is how bad they are, how they're going to hell if they don't stop, how much they must not care about God.What the heck do you think will happen if you tell them all that? That they'll just STOP? They KNOW the Bible says it's a sin! Do you honestly think they'll hear YOU say it and think "Wow, I've never heard that before. I should stop." All they're hearing is YOUR anger at their sin, YOUR judgement on them, YOUR disrespect for them as people, YOUR unwillingness to listen. Even if you're right, they won't care if all you care about is how bad they are for falling in love & all you're doing is condemning them for it. They won't care if they hear it from you. Let them know God how loves them & maybe they'll actually care about what God has to say. THEN they might turn away from it, not because you told them it was a sin, but because God told t...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

When was I angry at them? (Even if I was, being angry isn't a sin.) As I said, Jesus calls us to judge people. When did I disrepsect them? When was I unwilling to listen?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1)Jesus says that anger is almsot as bad as murder. 2) When did Jesus specifically say "I completely trust you to be fully capable of knowing that this person is right and that person is wrong. Once you decide someone's wrong, you don't have to listen to them or try to understand, just tell them thay're wrong over and over, regardless of what they try to tell you. Eventually they'll listen and turn away from sin." There are many other passages in the Bible telling us NOT to judge others.3)You disrespected them when you said what they do is a one way ticket to hell, me when you told me I don't love God enough, all of us by not listening. And don't try to tell me you are, because every time I make a point, you beat around the bush, ignore my questions and make a lame comparison.4)You don't listen to what I'm saying right now. You say the best thing we can do is tell gay people that what they're doing is a sin & you ignore what I already said about that topic.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. You didn't give an example of when I was angry. 2. I know what's right and wrong because I the Buble said what is right and wrong. I'm nit throughing my opinions in here. 3. This is like saying "You are disrepecting a rapist by saying what they're doing is wrong.". I never said you didn't love Gid enough. I said you wern't fully devoted to Jesus. If you were, you wouldn't be going directly against the Bible, simply because you would be ridiculed by society for being against gay rights. Just because I don't conform to your opinions about gays doesn't mean I'm not listening. I'm listening to the Bible. Ok, give me a question you asked earlier that I never answered. 4. I'm not saying we should tell people God loved them. But when somebody says being gay is ok I'm not going to just say "Oh well, God loves them." I will give them the facts about what God said about being gay.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

2) So, you believe that you are perfect at interperetting the Bible in every way and can't possibly be wrong? I wish I were that perfect. 3)AGAIN WITH THE BAD COMPARISONS! JUST STOP YOU'RE MAKING ME ILL! A rapist isn't doing anything even remotely good. Homosexuality at least results in real love.".. simply because you would be ridiculed by society for being against gay rights"Again with judging! You don't know me, you never even asked WHY I support them. You just ASSUMED you knew my intentions. You still haven't properly answered why God would say no to homosexuality in the first place. We can always find reson behind his other commands, why is this one any different? 4) The thing is, you told me the best thing we can do is tell people that being gay is a sin. They've heard it before. Shoving it down their throats won't change a stinking thing, in fact, you lecturing them when you don't even know them is making it worse.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. I didn't say that. I did say, that if the Bible says being gay is a sin it means being gay is a sin. The Bible isn't some riddle that we have to solve. 2. What if the rapist loves to rape people? If being gay wasn't socially accepted, would you be claiming the Bible was mis translated or that some parts were more important? I bet you wouldn't. By asking God for a reason, you are basically questioning Gods authority. He doesn't need a reason. 4. Again, I didn't say we shouldn't tell them God loves them, but when somebody says it's ok, I will debate them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Rapists may love to rape people but they don't love the people & that's not real love.& yeah. Even when I was a kid I saw nothing wrong with being gay & I live in a homophobic place & went to church all my life. & some parts ARE more important. Isn't following the rules of loving people, avoiding greed, & not killing people more important than if someone's gay or not? Jesus warns the people not to follow the pharasees 'cuz they follow the small laws over big ones like mercy, love & justice, so clearly Jesus thinks some are more important. God has a reason for all other commands. Why should this one be any different? God WOULD have reason. God doesn't just make laws 'cuz he feels like it. He has a reason for all his laws, so why can't you think of a reason for this? You believe every word of the Bible without question all of it even if it was only said once? Did you know a passage in the Old Testament says a woman can never enter heaven? Guess I'm goin to hell.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

For the love of humanity, seperate your clusterfudge of text into paragraphs. 1. And saying you shouldn't get in the way of love will lead to humans and animals getting married. Eaither way, they're both sin. 2. Give me the reference to where Jesus said that. Even if He did, some parts being more important than other doesn't mean some parts aren't important at all. 3. He doesn't give a reason for the dominion mandate, thou shalt not covet, nor "Be fruitful and multiply" 4. Yes I believe every word of it. And I love how you say "a verse" without even giving me the reference. Every time I quoted the Bible, I put it in quotes and gave you reference. And yes you are, if you take away from the Bible, Revelations 22:18-19.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I would seperate them, but I ran out of room to write. To fit everything in I had to scrunch it together.1.Animals are incapable of romantic love for humans.2.I didn't say they weren't important, I was arguing with your suggestion that they're all equally important so we should be crusading against gays as much as we crusade against killers. Jesus said it in Mathew: 23-24 3. But there ARE reasons. Coveting hurts people. Greed will never be satisfied and in trying to fill that satisfaction with earthly things, you will only hurt yourself & you will never find happiness. Covetting also leads to theft and murder. And I don't think be fruitful and multiply was exctly a commandment. More like a blessing, like God letting us go forth & be happy. If God doesn't tell us flat out, we can see logical reasons why they would be outlawed. I don't see why being gay is bad. 4. Ecclesiastes:7:28 It says there isnt a single good woman, & as we know bad people go to hell.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. What if 3 people loved each other, would you be ok with them getting a triple marrige? What if a 90 y/o man loved a 11 y/o girl, and she loved him back? 2. You obviously are saying they are unimportant by supporting gays. I would debate someone if they made a post about how muder is ok (which I do, I debate about abortion), but gay posts are much more prevelant. 3. Haha, you're still being so vague... You're giving me a 2 chapter span which you want me to read, infer which verse you were talking about, and then understand it. Refrence =/= chapter #. 4. Brb to Finnish this.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1.An 11y/o is emotionally incapable of fully understanding love.2. I don't care about your abortion thing, it's unrelated, why even bring it up? And It's so much less important than all the other sins, why not tell people to stop hating each other and start loving each other like Jesus wants you to, instead of hating on them. And don't try to tell me you don't hate them, because even if you don't, you're sure making it sound like you do.3.I DID tell you. If you didn't get it, it was because of a typo. it was Mathew: 23:23-24. And I SAID, Ecclesiastes:7:28.4.*finish. You would only capatilize the F and have two N's if you were referring to something or someone from Finland.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. According to your logic, you can't tell people who they can love. 2. I brought up abortion because you said I should be crusading against killers as much as I crusade about gays. 3. I'm pretty sure the Bible didn't say that they had to a 10th of their spices, so Jesus was saying they shouldn't put laws they made up over the Bible. 4. It also says that he only found 1 man out of the thousands. Are you saying that only one man has ever gotten to heaven? What a foolish thing to say, I could name plenty more than one man who got to heaven. We should take that verse in the context of ecclesiasts.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1.It's different with kids. Their minds aren't fully developed so they aren't prepared. The only difference betweeen 1 grown man & the other grown man's minds are that 1 of them likes other men. 2.How about liars, people who hate others, people who disrespect their parents, people who covet, etc? 3.10th of their spices? Can you check for a typo, it doens't sound like a complete sentence. Jesus said that you SHOULD tithe, so it's not just a made up law. What he was saying was that you needed to obey some laws more than others. In this case, teaching people to love God instead of telling them how bad they are. 4.It says 1 out of thousands not just 1 out of all men. Jesus says it's a narrow door, getting into heaven, so 1 man getting in, in a group of 1000 doesn't sound illogical. It does say that no woman can be good at all. & you just proved my point by the way. The Bible said these things & u just said u don't believe them. So why is it wrong now & not before?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. Haha, you're just making loopholes so your logic doesn't sound crazy. and what about 3 people loving each other. 2. Have I ever said those things were ok? no. 3. *to give a thenth of tgeir spices. and yeah, I'm going to tithe with spices 4. I'm not saying I don't believe it, I'm saying I don't believe it when people blatently rip it out of context, and skew it so that is says what they want it to.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you are my hero. this is one of the most awesome things i've ever read.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It'd be great to bring your girlfriend to. Cheap beer, nice music, and no one'll try to hit on her. Oh yeah, and that gay part...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

*stone

by Anonymous 13 years ago