+166 There shouldn't be a sequel to the sequel, amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

You're right, it should be called a 'threequel'

by Anonymous 12 years ago

What about Harry Potter? There's going to be eight movies...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

... They do. It's called a trilogy.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

... They do. It's called a trilogy.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

... They do. It's called a trilogy.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

... They do. It's called a trilogy.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

... They do. It's called a trilogy.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Harry Potter, Toy Story, Lord of the Rings, Star Wars...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

My point is that there shouldnt be one because 2 is enough, and usually the third one and on sucks and makes the other one look bad

by Anonymous 12 years ago

And my point is that it can turn out awesome so people are allowed to make more if they want and can.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It CAN. Doesn't mean they always do.. I didn't say they can't do it, I know they'll do whatever they want. I'm just stating there shouldn't be anymore after 2 movies. After that it just drags on.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

But in some cases they should because they're good. Toy Story 3? Some on, that was awesome!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

twilight?! DUH!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Well Harry potter turned out pretty good...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I think it's okay if it's already planned, and therefore fits with the story instead of dragging it on.

by Anonymous 12 years ago