+166
There shouldn't be a sequel to the sequel, amirite?
by Anonymous12 years ago
You're right, it should be called a 'threequel'
by Anonymous12 years ago
What about Harry Potter? There's going to be eight movies...
by Anonymous12 years ago
... They do. It's called a trilogy.
by Anonymous12 years ago
... They do. It's called a trilogy.
by Anonymous12 years ago
... They do. It's called a trilogy.
by Anonymous12 years ago
... They do. It's called a trilogy.
by Anonymous12 years ago
... They do. It's called a trilogy.
by Anonymous12 years ago
Harry Potter, Toy Story, Lord of the Rings, Star Wars...
by Anonymous12 years ago
My point is that there shouldnt be one because 2 is enough, and usually the third one and on sucks and makes the other one look bad
by Anonymous12 years ago
And my point is that it can turn out awesome so people are allowed to make more if they want and can.
by Anonymous12 years ago
It CAN. Doesn't mean they always do..
I didn't say they can't do it, I know they'll do whatever they want. I'm just stating there shouldn't be anymore after 2 movies. After that it just drags on.
by Anonymous12 years ago
But in some cases they should because they're good. Toy Story 3? Some on, that was awesome!
by Anonymous12 years ago
twilight?! DUH!
by Anonymous12 years ago
Well Harry potter turned out pretty good...
by Anonymous12 years ago
I think it's okay if it's already planned, and therefore fits with the story instead of dragging it on.
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago