+218 haveing no money is better than oweing money, amirite?

by Anonymous 10 years ago

Wait, do you seriously spell "having" and "owing" like that? I guess it's your preference...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

hahah oopps

by Anonymous 13 years ago

ono

by Anonymous 12 years ago

*oops .

by Anonymous 12 years ago

"Haveing" good spelling is better than "haveing" poor spelling.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Well, no. When the government owes money, it's not a good thing, but it's better than not having no money at all. It means the government at least has money to stimulate the economy so we can get out of a recession rather than slowing down the economy by not spending money at all.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Isn't that kinda obvious?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

This is kind of like saying -1 < 0 ...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Thanks CPT. Obvious

by Anonymous 12 years ago

This sounds like a 3rd grade math problem. If Jimmy has $0 and Stacey owes $300 in back taxes, who is less likely to hang themselves tomorrow morning? Or maybe that's just my school.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Oh we've all had that in 3rd grade, and we know the "gotcha" : Stacey actually has something to sell that Jimmy hasn't.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

It kinda depends how much money you'd have and how much you'd owe. If you had $2000, and owed someone $5, then obviously that would be better than having no money. But if you had like $100 and owed someone $90 or something, then having no money would kinda be better...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

How exactly is having $10 worse than having nothing?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

(Your+name+(optional)): Because it's not really enough to do much with... And if you started off with $100 and ended up with $10, it'd probably feel more disappointing than if you'd had nothing to begin with.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Right!

by Anonymous 10 years ago

Isn'it

by Anonymous 10 years ago

Right question

by Anonymous 10 years ago

no shit sherlock

by Anonymous 12 years ago