This doesn't even make sense. Not all people who use birth control or get abortions are teenagers. Not all teenager girls for Mitt Romney are having sex. And even if they do get pregnant, that doesn't mean they're going to change their stance.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I 100% agree with you. Don't get me wrong, I don't like Romney at all, but this post is just ridiculous

by Anonymous 11 years ago

This is one of the stupidest posts I've ever read.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Yes because it's wrong for a teenage girl nowadays to be a virgin!!!

by Anonymous 11 years ago

No one said that.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

no one said that at all actually

by Anonymous 11 years ago

but the op is assuming that the teenage girl will get pregnant. (let me know how you feel WHEN you cant get an abortion)

by Anonymous 11 years ago

"when you can't get birth control OR an abortion." OP is not implying that all teenage girls will get pregnant, just that some of their options will be taken away from them. It doesn't matter anyway because Romney is not against birth control.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

ok fine. they're assuming that teenage girls are having sex. WHEN YOU CANT GET BIRTH CONTROL. idk, i dont care, dont know where this is goin, this post is stupid, have a nice day. i'm out.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

OP did not imply in any way, form, or fashion that every single teenage girl is having sex, will get pregnant, or will get an abortion. Yes, it is a stupid post, and yours was a stupid comment.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

"all" the teenage girls.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Who want Mitt Romney as president, not all the teenage girls in the world. Your argument is still invalid.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

that's irrelevant to my point. whether it's every single girl or just those who support romney, the OP, while not explicitly stating it (and probably not doing so purposely) did hint that they were having sex, otherwise they wouldn't need birth control or abortions. it's just the way they worded it, not necessarily what they actually meant. Also, why are you arguing with me? This is dumb. You are dumb.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Aw, that's cute, you called me dumb because I proved your point wrong And that is very relevant to your point, because you said OP implied that every single teenage girl is having sex when they did not imply that at all. Now you are changing your story and trying to insult me because you are wrong. I'll give you a hint. This is the internet. I don't get insulted by children who act like 5 year olds and call people dumb just because they proved your point wrong.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I called you dumb because you're being annoying. You didn't prove my point wrong. I just said that OP made it sound like it's a fact that teenage girls are having sex. That's it. And then you said they didn't. So, I don't really see how that makes you right any more than it makes me right. We just have differing opinions and perceptions, but there was never really anything that anyone could "prove." You're basically just harassing me and making a huge deal out of nothing. Also, I never said "every single girl" anywhere in my comments, so I dont know why you're bringing that up anyway. Also, this is hardly an argument, because I'm hardly arguing with you.But if you want to feel that you "won" then go ahead, if that's what makes you happy. But I'll give you a hint. This is the internet. If winning pointless arguments on amirite actually makes you feel proud, you probably have severe self esteem issues.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I think it sounds like OP is implying all teenage girls have sex (or just the ones that favor Romney). She addressed it to all the teenage girls that want Romney as president and said "let me know how you feel when you can't get birth control or an abortion", which makes it sound like OP is saying they're definitely gping to need it.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

How am I harassing you any more than you are harassing me? You keep replying to me even after saying you are done with this discussion. Also, how is discussing opinions on here annoying? If you find that annoying then you are on the wrong site.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Because you keep replying to me and arguing with me, despite me saying i have no wishes to talk to you. Which is what maks you annoying.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Also, i was trying to say what statefarm said.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

All you had to do was not reply, and I would have no reason to reply to you. However, you do keep replying to me, and I thought you said this wasn't an argument? The difference between you and Statefarm though is that you were rude and Statefarm was not.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

OP was implying that all teeanage girls, well specifically the ones supporting Mitt Romney, have sex by saying "let me know how you feel when you can't get birth control or an abortion." His post would have made more sense if it was directed to women.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

So...what's it feel like to be a winner?

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I just watched some interviews with him and unless I am mistaken, he is not against birth control. He just does not think it should be required to provide free birth control, especially when it clashes with religious views. Such as Catholic based hospitals and facilities do not have to provide free birth control. And why should facilities HAVE to provide free birth control? It is a medication like any other and I've never heard of another medication being free.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Because all teenage girls can vote.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

It didn't say anything about voting. Someone can still want a certain person as president even if they are not old enough to vote.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Pretty sure most of those girls don't want birth control or abortions anyway, but I could be wrong.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

... Most likely if they're supporting Romney they are against abortions. And seriously, are all of them just running around having sex? This post makes no sense

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Exactly, they probably won't feel anything when they can't get those things because they won't want those things because they are against them.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I'm pro-choice, for gay marriage, and all around liberal when it comes to social issues, but I would still rather have Romney as president over Obama. Right now the economy and our debt is what needs to be focused on, not abortion and birth control. And Obama is not helping this country in my opinion. It pains me to say that I'd rather have Romney, because I really don't think he's a good choice, but Obama is an even worse choice.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

thank you! I know this election is long gone but I hated how people found those issues more important.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

oh my god. this post is so ignorant it actually hurts.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

yeah. because right now our country shouldn't be focused on the millions and millions of dollars we are in debt. we should focus on getting our free birth control..................................thefuck

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Oh, yes! How horrible! We can't take away innocent life because we had sex and now it's going to interfere with school or work for nine months...ohhh no. I also can't rip a baby apart or poison it causing long term affects like an increased risk of suicide, depression, alchol and drug abuse. Woe is us. Do some research you ignorant putz.

by Anonymous 11 years ago