That's true, but I'm pretty sure if you walked up to somebody, slit their throat with a knife and yelled, "Bang!" It would end up similar.
"You'd have to be pretty dodgy on the heart." Great Eddie Izzard skit.
I love that man. He's so funny
I've never, ever known an inanimate object to make a decision and then act on that decision. That would be like a sofa deciding to move to the other side of the room and then walking over there to the spot it prefers,
If one person hates another person enough, then someone's going to die, gun or no gun.
No, if a short non-muscular kid hates a 250-pound professional wrestler, then the wrestler probably isn't going to die unless the kid has a gun.
He said someone's going to die, not necessarily the intended target. Perhaps the non-muscular kid will die after trying to fight?
A gun isn't going to kill someone sitting in a cabinet. Someone has to use it. Besides, guns are just tools to an end. It is perfectly possible to murder someone with your teeth; all you need to do is go for the throat when they don't expect it.
chuck norris can
most ppl dont use guns to kill. shud they ban hands? those seem to do the most work in murder
Exactly! Thank you for saying what I couldn't find a good way to say!
If people didn't have guns, they would find other ways to kill.
OMG OMG OMG fangirl squee
that's what L did in Death Note lol
I saw this on TV somewhere...
If you really want to kill someone, anything could serve as your weapon.
As much as I support the second amendment, I would have to agree that "GDKPPKP" is a terrible argument.
you don;'t need a gun to kill lots of people