-182

Wouldnt it be better if anorexia only existed in 3rd world countries?? amirite?

14%Yeah You Are86%No Way
dexrites avatar
Share
1 17
The voters have decided that dexrite is wrong! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.

Wouldn't you hope that it didn't exist at all, in any countries? I wouldn't wish such a terrible thing on other people...amirite?

Why would that be better?

Roxies avatar Roxie No Way +6Reply
@Roxie Why would that be better?

Because they don't have food, so it'd be better if they didn't want the food anyway. It's better than them wanting the food but not having it.

Anonymous -2Reply

Yes. Given the two options:

1. Anorexia is in every part of the world (as it is now)
2. Anorexia is only in the third world.

Given the choice, option 2 must be the right choice. The poster is right.

NielsBrinchs avatar NielsBrinch Yeah You Are +1Reply

Hollywood doesn't exist in third-world countries, though...

your fuckin dumb for that

Anonymous -2Reply
@your fuckin dumb for that

fuk ur fuckin dumb mak me puk

Courage_Wolfs avatar Courage_Wolf Yeah You Are +6Reply
@Courage_Wolf fuk ur fuckin dumb mak me puk

carter, your grammar is beautiful.

@your fuckin dumb for that

Meh. You're both on an equal playing field for grammatical errors.

because there's more hunger there, so if they had anorexia, they wouldn't need as much food.

dexrites avatar dexrite Yeah You Are -8Reply
This user has deactivated their account.
@1568668

you're*
You shouldn't be calling people retarded.

@1568668

But they don't have food, so it's be better if they didn't want it anyway.

Anonymous -2Reply
This user has deactivated their account.
@1568848

It sounds terrible at the surface, but why is it better for them to not have food but they do want it? It'd be better if they didn't want the food anyway. Do you have any reasons other than "no just no"?

Anonymous -2Reply
Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.