+352 Like humans, dolphins also have sexual intercourse for fun as well. Next thing they need to do is make underwater cigarettes and they're set, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Like humans, dolphins also have sexual intercourse for fun as well." That was the most idiotic, redundant sentence I think I've ever read on the internet.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Sorry, but it's true.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. You have no way to prove that. 2. I was commenting on the "like humans", "also" and "as well" (two of which are excessive, thus making the sentence redundant).

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Then state that instead of leaving it out or else you're going to confuse people. Point shit out before calling it idiotic or redundant. Besides, I can type whatever the hell I want. Fuck the rules, as long as you understand what I say, then I don't see why it matters to you anyways.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I stated that the sentence was redundant, buddy. My, the people on this website are touchy. "Fuck the rules" -- typical teenager.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You're the one crying out a grammar error, buddy. My, the people on and off this website are touchy. "Fuck the rules" -- stereotypical teenager, not to be confused with people who make their own opinions and then learn to do as their told like they're slaves, and should embrace this freedom while they can because it's going to go away very, very soon

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It seems that we have something in common, in that case. Interesting diatribe -- I give it a 7.5 out of a possible 10 marks. You see, while it was rather inspiring, it turned cliché and ignorant early on. *they're *crying out at a grammatical error

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So I don't read over what I type. You still understood what I said. Why do you give two shits? Just let grammar evolve on its own. I hate tradition. God, this seems so fucking religious.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Every day, I attempt to improve the English skills of people around me. Hopefully, you'll learn something today (or tonight -- I'm not sure where in the world you are situated). What do you mean by "just let grammar evolve on its own"? I'm aware that, as a teenager, you dislike tradition and are an atheist and care about the environment and human rights. If you are an atheist, though (which is an assumption I am making, along with the idea that you care about the environment and human rights), why would you use the word "God" in a sentence? "For fuck's sake" might have been a more appropriate term -- in light of your tendency to curse, that is.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I am an atheist because the idea of any deity existing is just irrational. Humans are naturally irrational. I use "For god's sake" and other seemingly religious terms because those're the terms I grew up with. If I grew up with the term "soda", I'd use, "May I have soda?" If I grew up with the term "pop", I'd use, "May I have pop?" If I grew up with the term "y'all", I'd use, "Y'all are my best friend friends." If I grew up with the term "ain't", I'd use, "That ain't an excuse." It's indoctrination, grammatical indoctrination. The world's gone mad. Also, I approve of human rights, and the environment is iffy on me. I hate nature generally, because it gets on my nerves too much. I don't give a shit if they're hunting dolphins in Japan. Human rights, however, is a right of course. That, and equality. You probably think I'm the typical "I'm so different!" teenager, but I'm different because instead of following the stupid crowd of sheep I instead develop... (cont.)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(cont.) ... my own opinion on a matter and go from there. I'll say my opinion whenever I want because I don't give a shit about social norms (no, that's not common in teenagers; the "typical teenager" doesn't burp in public, must always look thin, lies to be nice, fart loudly, and are not themselves completely... Well, I'm not myself completely, but I try to get out everything for the most part. A few things I hide because I don't like embarrassment, just like most other humans, not limited to teenagers. Besides, I'm desperate for a boyfriend already). I'd also like it if you didn't use teenagers as a whole like we all have the same opinion. We don't, honestly I know. That's why there's different social classes and religion and other shit amongst us all. I hate tradition because I like change to the future and technological advancements, not because I'm annoyed with church. I actually have reasons behind my hatred.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There is no way to prove/disprove the existence of a deity or deities. Therefore, being atheist is almost as irrational as being religious. I apologize for being such a stereotypist. From now on, I'll use the term "most teenagers". As for equality, men, women and different races are not equal -- they are all physiologically different and have different cultures. Equality would be present in a utopia; however, the idea is ludicrous. Women (rather, effeminate types) tend to function well in the kitchen, while masculine types usually possess more of a "hunter" persona. It's all to do with the (im)balances of chemicals in one's body, not choice.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, it's not. Being an atheist is just as rational. Of course, being agnostic is the most rational, but I'm not going to lie and say, "I don't know." I have an opinion. "Most". Good escape technique. I use that often. Yes, all races and genders have differences. None are alike in all the same ways. But I don't find it bad that we can at least try and equalize them. I mean, as a homosexual (no, not the fad homosexual that thinks being gay leads you to women or makes you cool or different or whatever), I'm really sick of how we're being treated. Disgusting, filthy beings... "Unnatural" (which is strange because there are gay animals)... I mean you have to be different in some way that society hates, so you should know how it feels. A utopia is nearly impossible. Human civilization is too corrupt. It's nice to think about, though. And I know what you mean there. However, not all effeminate women like cooking, or can cook at all for that matter. Maybe... (cont.)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(cont.) ... the majority can, but there are also those who can't at all. I'm not masculine in the least, I'll admit that. I do have a slight interest in cooking, but I'm incredibly lazy so I don't do it often. I don't like cleaning, and I don't like doing most housewife things. Not because I'm a male, just because... I don't like them. I can't control what I like and dislike. To think I could is about the most idiotic thing I can think of. And I don't know what to classify myself under anyways. Sure, there are groups that represent major similarities (if you like video games or a certain type of music, you'd be in that group), but there are also the small, small things that make us all different. And I hate cliche story endings and such, but it's true as far as I know.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Being atheist and being religious are not the same things. Before being agnostic, one must ask oneself what "God" is defined as. That is truly the most logical way to go about such matters. It was not an escape technique. You pointed out my error, so I corrected it. In addition, I greatly dislike absolute generalizations. I hope it wasn't too late to correct myself. As long as you are equal on the surface (e.g., you have the right to marry), there should be no problem. Psychological blows are taken by those who want to take them. I personally will associate with any type of person as long as he/she is not annoying. I'm sure that I'm not the only one who thinks in such a way; therefore, if you are not annoying, you can avoid being treated horribly if you try. Ah, a utopia is completely impossible -- for all we know, we may be living in another world's utopia at the moment. The parameters regarding what a utopia is are not clearly defined -- ergo,

by Anonymous 13 years ago

For that last part, I had a theory on that a while back. For example, what we consider to suck (living the normal American life with drama in between) is probably what Africans (to stereotype) consider a dream. And little girls have always wanted to live in a castle, and in Scotland there are quite a few people who live in castles. Apparently most have horrible water problems, leaving you with a tough decision of either a super hot shower, or a freezing one.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

continued -- a utopia is not achievable. Effeminate human beings do not enjoy hunting -- they do not enjoy going out to get what they need. They enjoy staying at home, so to speak, and having things come to them. This does not mean that they are in any way parasitic -- they do their fair share (three rhyming words in a row) or work in the home by cooking and cleaning, etc. Of course most people are different (there are an infinite amount of variables found within each person's personality). However, broad generalizations can be made in certain situations.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I agree about the generalizations, but I only use those if there's nothing else I can use. For example, most women have some sort of breasts (even if small). I use "most" because there might be a woman out there with literally no breasts at all, yet not the male upper body. Actually I have no idea if that's possible because I haven't reached biology (if that's what it could be categorized as) yet.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

All females have or have had ovaries; otherwise, they don't classify as females. Yes, it is biology. It seems that we do, in fact, have a lot in common after all. Your theory of relative luxury is one I've been holding on to since I was around eleven years old.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I haven't a clue what relative luxury is, but I don't think we have a lot in common. We've only discussed a very small bit of subjects, after all.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You're familiar with relativity, I hope. You'd be surprised how difficult it is for one to find someone who thinks even the slightest way like oneself.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Sadly, no. I've never learned, or even bothered to research, relativity. Besides, Wikipedia ariticles are far too long and I'm incredibly lazy. And I guess since it is somewhat true that some teenagers do act like each other, it isn't that hard to find people who share my ideas and beliefs... Which is kind of sad.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's a simple concept. Thinking should not be about individuality, but thinking itself.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

And alas, Wikipedia is a wall of text. Thinking could be about individuality. The more you tell yourself the same thing, the more it becomes true.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wikipedia is hardly reliable. I know that you have grasped the concept because you described this society as being a third-world country's dream, while an extremely rich person may consider our method of living uncomfortable. Thinking can be about anything, but it should not be about individuality. I do not go out of my way to be different. Sometimes, my rules and/or opinions coincide with those of the majority. Sometimes, they do not. I have no problem with either scenario. Repeating something to oneself does not make it true. For example, I could attempt to convince myself that the sky is fluorescent orange; however, I will not believe it. That may just be my nature, however.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh, yeah. However I'm a hypocrite. I always talk crap about my life, but just because somebody loves your life doesn't mean you don't have a problem anymore. However that's not what I meant. You can't deny that the sky is normally blue in daylight. To tell yourself it's a fluorescent orange gives you a new perspective on fluorescent orange; that it's actually the color blue, and every time somebody says "fluorescent orange", you do not think of the color we normally think of, you think of the color we normally think of as blue. But no, I'm talking about beliefs and likes. If you told yourself, "I love women, not men, I love women, not men," over and over again, convincing yourself in any way possible that you're not a homosexual, you will begin to believe you love women. However, you're just coating the cover of the peanut so it looks like chocolate. The peanut is still there.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Cool story, bro.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

just shut up

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This argument was ended months ago, dumbass. Now you're trying to start it back up again? Or are you trolling?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's remarkable how a simple comment on a grammatical error turned into a religious debate, and then some. By the way, I'm not saying you overreacted or anything (No sarcasm).

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I mostly try to stay on-topic. Sometimes I get sidetracked... It's weird though, innit?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Hi, how old are you? I'm just wondering, because you said you haven't reached biology, but you seemed really smart.... So yeah? I was just wondering.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(Hi there.): Well, I'm in biology now. I'm 15.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So, where can I find some dolphin porn? I hear National Geographic has some pretty good stuff.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Pig's orgasms last to 30 minutes! :D

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I know man, it's freaky.

by Anonymous 13 years ago