The voters have decided that this post is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Also about source and wikipedia+213Wikipedia is not 100% reliable, but it tells you specifically which sentences need verification, so the bulk of most articles is just a good a source as any other website, amirite?
Also about valid and wikipedia+478It frustrates you when people criticize wikipedia because "Anyone can go on there and post stuff." Yeah, and how is that different from the rest of the internet? I could make my own webpage if I want, but that doesn't make the information valid. Also Wikipedia has moderators and references so it is probably more reliable than any other website, amirite?
Also about source and wikipedia+53When people make a serious point about something and add "I read that somewhere" - they're probably talkin about Wikipedia, but don't want to say in case they get torn into for relying too much on Wiki as the source of all their information, amirite?
Also about valid source-115Seriously, a wiki is not a valid source of information, so stop citing it like it is, amirite?
Also about wikipedia and valid source+223wikipedia is a valid source if your professor uses it, amirite?
Also about source and wikipedia+437Wikipedia always has the best information on your topic. If only it counted as a "reliable source," amirite?