+389 Nuclear weapons are like condoms: It is better to have them and not need them than to need them and not have them, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No nation "NEEDS" nuclear weapons

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You never know. If something drastic happens, you might

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Like if they want to have NUCLEAR SEX!! Right?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you don't need nuclear weapons. if something drastic happens, then establish yourself as a passive country. that way, no one bombs you, and you just wait it out

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Are you kidding me? You sir, are an idiot! If I say ok bully, I won't fight back anymore. Do you think he's gonna stop bullying me? No. You're a moron.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i'm not a moron. i'm saying, if a huge world war broke out, and every country was nuking every other country, you should just simply wait it out and try not to get nuked

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, you're still an idiot, if there was a nuke war, nukes would be flying, and heck, Switzerland would even get attacked.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ask Poland what happens to neutral powers in the face of a consuming empire. ;P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Love_Struck has a point. If you don't fight back, you get bullied MORE.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

... okay, first, thanks for the eternal mental image of two nukes having sex (i don't know, okay), and second, nukes wouldn't be necessary if no country has them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, but the bad countries (iran, russia) won't just give up there nukes.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

whats bad about russia

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They seem friendly, but they invaded Georgia, and deal nukes to Iran and Korea.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Also, this is love_struck signed into my account.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

in their defense, america probably wouldn't either. sure they may say they have, but the truly wouldn't. also, why do you consider those two countries bad?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"bad" countries no, bad leaders/government

by Anonymous 13 years ago

All this is irrelevant. The threat of a thermonuclear war today is extremely tiny. The only countries that would use nukes aggressively are the ones who have only made tiny nukes as opposed to thermonuclear. (Thermonuclear=1000 times more powerful then conventional nukes like the ones detonated in Japan)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'd say that the threat is more than extremely tiny. You underestimate how crazy people are.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Leave it to amiriters to take a joke WAY to seriously...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

How is this a joke? It may be funny in a way, but it's more like an analogy. We're discussing. Is it a bad thing to take some things seriously every once in a while? :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

what about to need them and not have them

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Soo you're basically saying peace and no sex vs mass war and sex, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago