-1,722 I really don't understand why harry potter is such a big deal. Robert Pattinson could easily play harry and Kristen Stewart Hermione, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You're right, they could!! Doesn't mean they should. :/

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Can you just die, please.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I love this comment so so much.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Don't worry everyone. It's just a little troll. Maybe if we're really quiet it will go away.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Or we could just stone it...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

it's in the dungeon. thought you ought to know....

by Anonymous 13 years ago

TROLL! TROLL IN THE DUNGEON!!!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Please try and compare the correct characters... Ron/Hermione, Harry/Ginny. Harry/Hermione should never have the shitty, fake, disgusting chemistry Robbie and Kris have, period.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No. Just... no. Starting with the fact they're both terrible actors, stopping for a lunch break at the fact that Hermione shouldn't be the one played by someone who has 'chemistry' with Harry's actor and finally ending with the fact they're both too stuck up to ever truly get inside their characters.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They're not BOTH terrible. Kristen is...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They are BOTH terrible actors.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I think Robert was terrible in the Twilight movies, but as Cedric Diggory and in Remember Me he was pretty good. (:

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I don't think he was a good Ced. He didn't portray Cedric as they described in the book. He's supposed to be a "pretty boy," but he's ugly as fuck. I didn't see Remember Me, because I don't want to see his ugly face any more than I have to. And, I have to because my cousin and best friend are obsessed with him.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I think everyone overexaggerates his ugliness, but I get your drift.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

he's super ugly!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

and the books are super ugly!!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Aha i read this thinking that the author meant that rob could play both harry and hermoine, that would have been better.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Except Robert pattison was deffinatly in Harry potter, he played Cedric Diggory

by Anonymous 13 years ago

uhmmm, so?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah. We could also offer you as a sacrifice to the giant squid at the bottom of the lake at Hogwarts.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I think we REALLY need a favorite comment button.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Thank you. I put a lot of thought into that comment.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lmao all these Harry Potter nerds wouldn't be making a big deal of it if Robert and Kristin originally played the part.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

@599994 (Mike): Yeah, and all of these Twilight fags wouldn't make such a big deal if they had any taste.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

INTERNET HIGH FIVE! *raises hand*

by Anonymous 13 years ago

All of these "Harry Potter nerds" wouldn't have liked the movies if Robert and Kristen played them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Kristen stewart has the emotional range of a depressed doorknob. I don't think she could play hermione.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(emma-the-colorgua...): *teaspoon

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I see what you're getting at, but it's worded weird. I think the OP means that if Pattinson played Harry and Stewart played Hermione in the Sorcerer's Stone and onward, everyone would love them like they love Radcliffe and Watson. And everyone would hate Twilight if Daniel Radcliffe played Edward and Emma Watson played Bella. lol

by Anonymous 13 years ago

wrong. if pattinson and stewart played harry and hermione, then there wouldn't be any harry potter fans. If they hired decent actors for twilight instead of those ugly, talentless fags then I might not hate it as much.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(Stay Gold Ponyboy): If Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson HADN'T gotten their roles in Harry Potter, maybe they'd be talentless fags. If Pattinson and Stewart started HP, no one would have any reason to hate them because they would've been young and inexperienced in the acting world. And if Radcliffe and Watson were cast as the lead roles in Twilight (without being leads in HP, like Pattinson and Stewart) no one would like them because they'd be 'talentless fags', as you say. I'm not defending Twilight, but if the lead roles were switched, I think people would still have the same idea about both series/movies. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I agree with the first part of this post. Wtf is the big deal with harry potter? I really don't like fangirls for either book.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This post made me throw up in my mouth a little.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

lucky... i actually had to run to the bathroom

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Kirsten stewart could NOT play hermione. Emma Watson is the best.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Can I just say something?Why don't you just go feed yourself to fluffy, lock yourself in a room with Peeves, Look into the eyes of a basilik, get the Dementor's Kiss, Suffer through potions with Snape, Have a house elf stalk you, watch someone get killed, fight a dragon, watch the darkest wizard ever come back to life, have constant burning pains, watch the greatest wizard die, and then fight the darkest wizard ever.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

we seriously need a favourite comment button...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ahh Harry i thought i heard your dulcet tones, you don't want to bottle up anger like that, let it all out there might have been some people fifty miles away who didn't hear you ~OotP

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Cool story bro.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Kristin Stewart cannot play Hermione because Hermione isn't a moody bitch who is bored all of the time and hates life, and that's the only character that Stewart knows how to play.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This post makes me shudder.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I don't really like fans of either book, they get kinda crazy. but the only think I wanna see Robert and Kristen play is dead. that would make me happy.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Umm....hell no.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I think people who are obsessed with Harry Potter are annoying. I do like some of the movies, so I'm not hating on it. As with annoying Twilight fans...I've never encountered those. I like Twilight, but I don't like Kristen Stewart or Taylor Lautner.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Listen, people WOULDN'T like Harry Potter if Kristen and Robert played the main characters. And it's possible that people would like Twilight if the actors in it didn't suck.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I guarantee they wood. Just like if daniel radcliffe played edward, you would hate him. Actually, you hate who they play in movies. Im not sure why people hate them as people, theyre just doing what theyre told

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Learn some grammar. And your name is Mike? I take it you've never had a girlfriend. What do you get off to, Twilight's badly written Romance? You're obviously Team Virgin.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lmao look what time I wrote that at. I was about to pass out, SO SORRY! And what does my name have to do with anything, Mr. Anonymous? Suck my dick or shut the fuck up.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

** Would I'm pretty sure that they would like the books but not really want to see the movies because the acting is that bad. And they might get slightly more interesting in Twilight if they had actors who knew how to act.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They're not fit for the part. And besides Radcliffe, Grint and Watson had been there from the beginning. AND Pattinson was in HarryPotter: The Goblet of Fire. So no. STFU and GTFO

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If they had been chosen in the first place, and never involved with twilight, then yes, I believe they could have. People wouldn't hate them so much. I just don't think they're the right type of actors for the characters. Robert Pattinson would probably do a fine job, but Kristen is just a great big ball of awkward.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's not just Harry Potter fans who are hating on this post, it's everyone who recognizes a good actor from a sucky one.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No... NO... just... ewwww... dear god no...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Probably not, no one can possibly deny that Pattinson is gay and Kristen is almost as good at acting as my big toe

by Anonymous 13 years ago

oh HELLLLL no. *shoots in face*

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Nah having Americans play them would ruin it.... English accents are betttterrrr

by Anonymous 13 years ago

bettaaa

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Just no. You should be Aveda Kedveraed for that.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Kristen Stewart is a HORRIBLE actress. All she does is stutter, brush her hair behind her ears, and blink a lot.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

oh dear.. whoever wrote this post really has some problems..

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no. NO. NO NO NO NO. don't ever insult emma watson like that around me, you hear? if she played bella, people would call her a wonderful, beautiful actress because that's what she is, although they would still say twilight sucks.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?!?!?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

TROLL IN THE DUNGEON!!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

O_O

by Anonymous 13 years ago

HP fans noses flare. SHITS BOUT TO GET REAL.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you're effing stupid.they're both terrible actors.Kirsten Stewart is a crack whore who doesnt know how to keep her damn mouth closed.Robert Pattenson isn't funny or charming like Danielle Radcliffe is.you should just go crawl in a hole and stay there

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I HATE HARRY POTTER!!! It's sooooo freakinnnnn annnnoyyyyyiiinnnggfg

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Well, the could. But then no one, and I mean NO ONE (except for creepy fangirls, who don't count anyways) would go see it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago