Martin Luther King should have pulled out, because no one deserves to see their child die, amirite?

i agree but i dont agree.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are neutral.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am undecided.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are indecisive.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am irresolute

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are astraddle (Thank you Thesaurus.com)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am faltering

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are hot and cold.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am yes and no

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are of two minds.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am wishy-washy (Thank-you Thesaurus.com)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are on the fence.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am weak-kneed

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You are hawing. (I think we might be pissing this guy off with all the notifications.)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i am waffling (I think so too...)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'd rather watch my child die after accomplishing goals that would affect people forever than not have a child at all. (I actually don't want kids, but that was a damn powerful statement)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This could literally apply to anyone. Why did you use Martin Luther King?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This could not literally apply to anyone. They needed someone whose parents out lived them as an example.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No, my point is this: it is impossible to tell if your child will die before you, so by the OP's logic, everyone should pull out because the possibility exists for anyone. Martin Luther King couldn't have foreseen his son's assassination any more than Joe Shmoe from down the street could have.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

OP obviously doesn't have logic. He was just using someone who works as an example, because it did happen to them. IT could've happened to anyone, but it didn't.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

So . . . it didn't happen to anyone?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

By your question, I can tell that you're not intelligent enough to continue this debate with.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Cool beans. I can tell by your comment that you just realized you haven't been making sense, and you want a quick and easy way to end this. Peace.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

By "it didn't happen to anyone", I obviously meant he couldn't have used anyone it didn't happen to to prove the (rather weak) point of the post. Yes, it could apply to anyone, but he needed an example

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh yes. Obviously that's what you meant. Obviously. But for the sake of people with lower intelligence levels such as myself, next time you should say what you mean.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I said what I meant. I assume people understand figures of speech.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Apparently you also assume that you understand what a figure of speech is.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I know what a figure of speech is, and though it wouldn't commonly be considered one, what I said technically falls into the category.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay.

by Anonymous 13 years ago