+289 Okay guys, let's get one thing straight here. The transitive property is for math, not sayings. So if practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, that doesn't justify not practicing. amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm eating chips.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You're also commenting on an amirite, therefore eating chips = commenting on amirite.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They're doritos.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I was eating doritos earlier, wanna mug some people?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Okay.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You eat chips a lot, don't you? And you like commenting to tell people that? :P

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Its important.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

that's not the transitive property.. that would be a converse of the conditional statement. and it would just be false.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If A=B, and B=C, then A=C. Transitive property. Therefore, op is right.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

(Your+name+(optional)): That is the transitive property, but not applied to the statement

by Anonymous 13 years ago

To elaborate on why I don't think this is a valid statement... Applied to the statement, it would read: If Practice = Perfect, and Perfect = Nobody, then Practice = Nobody. However it doesn't make sense saying that a noun is equal to an adjective. I like the idea, but I don't really think that it is the transitive property, or that it has the correct grammer

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I believe that would be a logical fallicy (sp?). I love those! such as: You drink water. Fish have sex in water. You drink fish sperm.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It took me a while to get that, but you're right! Yay! :D

by Anonymous 13 years ago

If practice then perfect not perfect (P -> Q ~Q Therefore not P) It's Reasoning so it would work for sayings...

by Anonymous 13 years ago