The voters have decided that verticallychallenged is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also about wikipedia pages
+457You wonder if famous people ever edit their own Wikipedia pages, amirite?
Also by verticallychallenged
+10The spinning top in Inception WAS still spinning, as it says it on the films manuscript, amirite?
Also about wikipedia pages
+424It must be sad to be the person who goes in and edits people's Wikipedia pages to past tense after they die, amirite?
Also by verticallychallenged
+8With the amount of rain England has been having, we should start lining the animals up into pairs, amirite?
I just searched "7" on wikipedia.
Holy. Crap.
That whole entire page only has one reference.
The Wikipedia page "List of Numbers" starts off with "This list is incomplete"
The se7enth column
nobody will get the reference...
Finally, a bungie.net member.
Are you a Floodian as well?
I see. I might switch over to the PS3, just cause MGS4 is on it.
Who knew there was so much to learn about the number 69?
I was actually surprised there wasn't more references to the metaphysical debate of numbers existing only as concepts or if they are real, as the most common example is the number seven in this debate.