An amirite user should be judged by his comments, and not his posts. He could have the funniest posts in the world... from somewhere else. but, comments can't be reposts, rather, they are snappy remarks made that are completely the user's mind, amirite?

+274 An amirite user should be judged by his comments, and not his posts. He could have the funniest posts in the world... from somewhere else. but, comments can't be reposts, rather, they are snappy remarks made that are completely the user's mind, amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Eh, I think you need both in order to be considered a great amiriter.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

You have a point, but I'm not talking about great amiriters, but instead amiriters in general

by Anonymous 12 years ago

If an amiriter is stealing posts/not crediting... he/she should be judged.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I think he means if you were to decide if an amiriter was good or not, look at their comments instead of their posts as proof

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I know...If I was deciding whether an amiriter was good or not and they had unoriginal, stolen, sloppy posts, I would go with the latter.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Judged by who?

by Anonymous 8 years ago

This post is tr00 fax

by Anonymous 12 years ago

An example of a bad comment.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

The first sentence was pretty self explanatory.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

tl;dr

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Unless their comment is unorginal too...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Unless their comment is unoriginal too...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Unless their comment is unoriginal too...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It sort of depends. I would say a small tad from the posts and a bigger tad from the comments.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Well I'd have to agree with you there seeing as I only comment and don't make posts.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Nobody should be judged for anything they say about anything.

by Anonymous 8 years ago