-286
That 19 year flash forward at the end of Harry Potter was completely unnecessary, amirite?
by Anonymous11 years ago
Flash forward? Honey, that was the epilogue. And it was completely neccesary.
by Anonymous12 years ago
JK Rowling added that in hopes that it will prevent people from trying to make another movie.
by Anonymous12 years ago
Yeah.... no. It was in the book. She did it to wrap up the series.
by Anonymous12 years ago
It was in the book jackass.
by Anonymous12 years ago
Even if it was in the book, it didn't add anything to the movie
by Anonymous12 years ago
Closure.
by Anonymous11 years ago
If '19 years later' hadn't been in the book, it would have ended with Harry wanting a sandwich. Which would have been pretty anticlimactic for one of the biggest book franchises in the world.
by Anonymous11 years ago
you are clearly not much of a potter fan if you thought it was unnecessary.
by Anonymous11 years ago
The entire book is unnecessary if you think about it. But sense there is a book, the ending was necessary to wrap the series up.
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 11 years ago
by Anonymous 11 years ago
by Anonymous 11 years ago
by Anonymous 11 years ago