there should only be one side, its not true, but because no one researches, these things it sells well

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Sounds like a conspiracy theory.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Controversial...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

There are always two or more sides to everything. With global warming, we still don't know what part of it is natural warming/cooling cycle of the planet and what part is human induced/accelerated. With gay rights, there is always a fine line between legal gay rights and the compulsory inclusion of gay people by religious institutes. We can all agree that gay couples should be allowed to be married and receive all the legal benefits of marriage but should a church be required to wed them?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

If you mean knowing that global warming isn't real then I completely agree with this post. Otherwise...I couldn't disagree more.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Wrong. Global warming is real and is being caused by human activity and its effects will be devastating.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Wrong. http://on.wsj.com/yqTUBR What are you basing that off of exactly?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I'm basing that off the scientific consensus.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

"There's no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to 'decarbonize' the world's economy." - http://on.wsj.com/yqTUBR What was that you were basing your argument on again?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

That statement was based off of people who went against //scientific consensus.// I base my argument off scientific consensus.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

"In 2003, Dr. Chris de Freitas, the editor of the journal Climate Research, dared to publish a peer-reviewed article with the politically incorrect (but factually correct) conclusion that the recent warming is not unusual in the context of climate changes over the past thousand years." Actually, they are basing their arguments off of factually correct statistics. So I'd say that counts as scientific consensus.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

You got that article from the opinion section of the Wall Street Journal. Whoever wrote it is probably not scientifically literate.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Actually, the article is signed by 16 scientists. The people who agree enough with the author to put their name on the article are all scientists, so there are no scientific errors in the article. "Editor's Note: The following has been signed by the 16 scientists listed at the end of the article"

by Anonymous 12 years ago

There are, also, some scientists who don't believe in evolution.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

There are, also, some scientists that believe global warming is real. The scientists who don't believe in evolution and the ones who believe in global warming are at just about the same level of stupidity in my book.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

90% of scientists believe global warming is a real and very serious phenomenom

by Anonymous 11 years ago