Is section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 still justified by current needs?

The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in the case of Shelby County v Holder. Section 5 prohibits certain “covered jurisdictions” from making any change in their voting procedures without first demonstrating to either the Attorney General or a three-judge district court in Washington that the change “neither has the purpose nor will have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color.”

Image for post Is section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 still justified by current needs?
Kiras avatar Politics
Share
0 1
There are no comments here yet. Start the conversation below!
Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.