Are humans too arrogant to decide if an animal is our food? Are we adding values to lives just simply by our judgements?
We eat some animals but ban eating the others. Which one do you agree:
1. Humans are too arrogant to believe that we have have the power and authority over the nature and give different values to different lives, which may probaly be equal.
2. Limiting the animals we can eat is a way to prevent us form exploiting the rest of the nature. This is to prevent humans' arrogance from destroying the natural balance.
P.S. This question is neutral on this issue.