The United States should repeal the 2nd Amendment. Amirite?

The second amendment should it be repealed on the grounds that when originally written it was for a smaller population to defend the "State" and meant for Muskets and flintlocks not semi automatics and military hardware, which makes it no longer viable on account of relevance to this day and age.

That Militia should be held to Law Enforcement agencies, Military and government controlled Para military agencies, with a show need, clause for people such as certain Primary producers etc.

It's time to tell the NRA and the Gun Lobby there will be no more "collateral" damage no matter how much you donate to the "Party"

9%Yeah You Are91%No Way
Countries & Places
0 11
The voters have decided that this post is wrong! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.

The original intent of the founders included a means to overthrow the tyranny of a federal government that exceeded its limited powers at the expense of freedom.

Repealing one of the Bill of Rights is just...no.

Do not open the door to repealing any amendment in the first 10. They are sacred.

I'm not sure it should be repealed, but it would help if a lot of the 2nd Amendment supporters would actually read it and figure out what it means.

A lot of people are doing it wrong.

No where in the 2nd amendment does it say that it applies only to muskets and flintlocks. The founding fathers encouraged militias so the people could keep the government under control. America has never needed militias more than right now!

Image in content

Anonymous +1Reply

No, don't be silly.

Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.