Also about laws and mass+40Ghosts are said to be cold, so maybe they absorb heat energy and store it, so be converted to kinetic energy later on. It's possible that ghosts don't violate the laws of physics by moving things without having mass, therefore not having kinetic energy, amirite?
This user has deactivated their account.
Also about mass and shootings+13The media (in the US at least) needs to shut up about celebrity news, school shootings, and racist actions. Although some want to know about this stuff, it only perpetuates celebrity publicity stunts, more mass killings, and racism in general. Amirite? More
Also about mass shootings+130With three mass shootings in the last month alone, America is abusing its privileges as a first world country by acting like a second world country, amirite?
Also about mass shootings-7You would think someone would notice that WHITE people are largely the victims of mass shootings ...but you just dont care, amirite?
Also about ideas-22There are no new ideas, just newly tweaked ideas, amirite?
Also about Religion-40Protestants accuse Catholics of worshipping Mary but have no problem following a crappily translated English version of the Bible from some crappy English King, most likely with bad teeth, who basically had no more authority to introduce his own version than any other person, amirite?
Also about laws and prevent+245So, because of James Holmes, they're going to try to make stricter gun laws to prevent shooting sprees. Because criminals totally follow laws, amirite?
Also about mass+48According to the law of conservation of mass, it is impossible to create or destroy matter. This disproves time travel as it would violate said law. Sending mass back in time increases the amount of energy that exists at that particular moment, and depletes it at the point in time from which the matter had been sent, thus deeming time travel physically impossible, amirite?
Also about mass shootings+15This century, there have been more than enough mass shootings for Congress to finally ban assault weapons. After all, people don't need weapons that fire rapidly just to fire back at a would-be killer. We don't need rapid-firing assault weapons in our community. And banning assault weapons won't defy the second amendment, since it would only limit their rights based on types of guns. Ordinary handguns/rifles/shotguns are enough, but rapid-firing weapons only benefit serial killers, amirite?