If you put her in a box, would she simultaneously become both female and male until the box is opened?
I don't know Schrödinger, you tell me.
She/he would be in a mixed state, although Einstein would disagree.
And Janet's Name is Janet
I don't get it
Give it time, you will find someone.
JD, you're back!
Watch out for deranged libs, though.
That's the spirit! Keep the deranged libs at bay, I always say.
Of course, JD, that's what fairies do.
Try rubbing your magic lamp, JD.
Oh - and how I remember this "Cosa Nostra" celebration and shooting scene.
Remembering the last scene, i.e. "Nobody is perfect" ...
And JD always likes it hot.
Oh yes, steaming and salacious - lol.
- oh oh - blushing -
JD often calls forth my salacious instincts.
I was sure that you would appreciate the term, and JD appreciates your witty, a bit daring comments - lol.
I think that looking into some funny words would have a hilarious effect ...
JD has a boundless capacity
(Not to mention an endless voracity)
And fondness for smut
That will tickle his gut,
And edacity for bawdy salacity.
If speaking of edacity,
there's greed behind predacity -
supported by mendacity
and noteworthy tenacity -
to satisfy voracity,
behind soupy opacity.
It is much like rapacity,
occurring with salacity;
wishing rather capacity
than the way of sagacity
(resting upon veracity),
or concern for feracity.
Wait a minute, Vic!
How sexist and exclusionary of you, not to mention the possibility of male-male marriages, and all other possible combinations!
Um. Interesting take on a post that implies my wife can select whichever sex she chooses
But Vic, not so long ago you were regaling us about how we can't be sure of anything.
Have you come around to Einstein's view?
We can't. I don't argue with her.
Meh... you armchair philosophers are all alike when push comes to shove.
Best of your all time posts, VicZinc.
Oh...you mean she is the female sex in prison?