+5

Prediction: Mike Flynn will be star States Witness when Russiagate charges are filed against top administration officials (and perhaps against Trump himself).

Carter Page, Roger Stone and Paul Manafort have agreed to testify for the House Committee (not Senate), the house committee is run by Trump Loyalist, so these guys are sticking with the party line story. (The Senate committee would have real teeth, so they are staying away from there.)

Flynn is the only one to have registered as a 'foreign agent' sense the accusations were revealed. He is the only one who has not publicly spoken out, nor has he copped to the party line touted by Steve Bannon and Breitbart. His registration as an FA opened the door to immediate felony charges of espionage, they were not forth-coming. Why?

This smells like Flynn is working with FBI and needs to keep his mouth shut in exchange for an immunity deal when he finely testifies in open court. Mark my words. If the house does not subpoena Flynn in the next few days then he is working with the Feds.

73%Agree27%Disagree
VicZincs avatar
Share
3 7

Vic, that seems very plausible.
I think trump thought he had more power than he does

"I will appoint a special prosecuter to look into clintons emails"

LOCK HER UP!

I think he may have promised insulation.

Flynn would be the most believable witness.

Carlas avatar Carla Agree +3Reply
@Carla Vic, that seems very plausible. I think trump thought he had more power than he does "I will appoint a special...

I think you're right and that's why they are keeping Flynn under wraps. He knows a lot about Trump and he might be the very one to bring him down. After being fired, I'm sure he's not too happy with Trump.

@Carla Vic, that seems very plausible. I think trump thought he had more power than he does "I will appoint a special...

we NEED a SP for the emails

The Hillary classified email scandal is easy to research. and any idiot can verify the facts.... HRC was responsible for and had been trained to classify information before sending it and she failed miserably to do that. In fact she could not do that from here unsecure server or device. Which may explain why she did not even try but just sent emails containing classified information. The manual for that and other government guidance is all over the place. Hillary was an OCA - Original Classification Authority - see the manual at link. thus she was trained on how information should be classified...this investigation is not about emails its about Classified INFORMATION Hillary put into emails and did not mark or send correctly...
http://www.cdse.edu/documents/c...-reference.pdf

This comment was deleted by its author.
@2530385

ROFL...the FBI has released enough on ol Hillary to indict a 1,000 people - and because of Strzok and lynch , she skated...

Trump has done nothing.

here is the FBI on ol Hillary

110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is likely that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

Flynn should never have been charged..In contrast hillary should have been indicted

here is just part of what the FBI said about Hillary ...and that idiot skated!

"110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

The Democrats are setting themselves up for a fall. If the Trump administration was to go after the Democrats without provocation for colluding with foreign governments, they'd be seen as bad sports. The Democrats' idiotic pursuit of baseless claims of Russian influence over the GOP gives the GOP perfect pretext to nail the Democrats to the wall over their massive and easily proven collusion with multiple foreign governments.

Just wait 'till the other shoe drops.

@Maze The Democrats are setting themselves up for a fall. If the Trump administration was to go after the Democrats...

AND they can go back and get that liar Hillary and others - like huma

is Hillary aide Huma ...she is caught with classified emails on her unsecure PHONE (a felony) that she is sending to her unsecure home PC - one used by pedophile Weiner ! (another felony) and printing at home (another felony) for HRC...and NO ONE is charged....

Not even reported was the fact that this clown Hillary used a unsecure Commercial PHONE to talk and email from in all 112 countries she visited including Russia and China. that's why its amusing to hear that idiot Yates say she was concerned that someone might blackmail Flynn for what he said in a phone conversation...DUH...How about HRC..Little doubt they have all her emails and every word she said on the phone, recorded in Russia...
Image in content

Anonymous