Unless you have the report of the police telling this was about the flags, what you're doing right now is assuming stuff and misleading others by passing it as facts.
"At this point it seems to be an isolated incident," ISP Sgt. John Perrine said. "We're not even sure that it's connected to the flags, or if it was just a case of road rage."
That's right - we can't assume that the shots had anything to do with the flag. It could have been any number of things like, ...., well it could have been any number of things.
However, it is absolutely rock solid and not misleading to write a story accusing the president of crazy shit with undisclosed sources and no evidence.
You know bud, i dont speak much regarding this investigation. I have, however, spoken about trumps documented past.
You have no idea what they do or dont have on the trump teams, past or present. Any solid investigator would keep the incriminating and/or damaging facts, close to the chest. Just the fact that they are investigating at all, speaks volumes. And it isnt just the left.
Im tired of hearing it, too.
But, just maybe, the conversation would ease if there wasnt a childish tweet from trump, daily.
Thus far Carla, there's no evidence of a crime having been perpetrated. Now, If I were the target of massive, persistent baseless accusations, I think I might use whatever means I have at my disposal to defend myself too.
Meanwhile, the media making these baseless accusations, and Comey admitting a few days ago that Trump was never under investigation, but the accusations still come - I wonder if the conversation would ease if the media would simply shut the phuck up until / unless they have an actual story to report.
But, that's just me.
Again bud, you dont know what evidence they do or do not have. Unless you're a fed....are you?
Investigative resourses are not spent because of baseless claims. Firemen dont leave until the smoke stops swirling. Sometimes there is no fire, sometimes there is.
As far as using twitter to defend oneself, i think that absurd.
How about when there no evidence that a crime has been committed? I mean, shouldn't there be some indication that a crime has been committed? An irregularity?
So far all they got is that Hillary lost an election. I can explain that. No one on the left can, but reasonable people can.
Initially it was collusion to help the Russians hack the election. That never got legs - over 7 months it took to make that go away. How many government man hours do you suppose were wasted on the wild goose chase? How many citizens lost health insurance during that time government was at a standstill?
Now, it's obstruction of justice, cuz he said, 'Jeez, he's a nice guy. I hope you can let go of this Flynn thing." Well, that's either obstruction of justice or it's not. Which is it? Can we move on now?
If you switched the parties around it would have been the ball players out shooting people because they're offended about something and they can't find their safe space.