The President tweeted this question just this morning.
They already have.
Besides....she isnt running the country.
Better question...are they looking at money laundering through real estate investments?
Im not going to post a link. But read an article a while ago about manafort, his purchase of a unit in trump tower and subsequent sale....kind of a hinky deal.
I don't know a thing about the "hinky deal", but I agree with your assertion that she isn't being investigated (as much as some would like) because she's not the POTUS. I had that as another option but removed it before posting.
I think that is exactly what Muller is doing, following the money.
That and attack his accuser. He's quite predictable in this way.
They did many times, plus, she's not president....Trump is, too bad he isn't acting like one.
Well, for starters, the DNC refuses to release their server to the FBI for investigation.. (I didn't know you could do that - maybe it's a democrat perk?)
Wow...do you ever check anything you are fed?
Your president loves to try and divert attention. And your eyes focus on any direction he points.
I know the propaganda wing is running cover for the democrats and they've run a lot of stories to the contrary - but the fact remains - they haven't turned over the server to the FBI.
I havent given the fbi my dogs tag numbers.
Guess what? They havent asked for them.
I don't know what to believe Carla. This article is full of holes as it stands!
I don't think any one is giving straight answers on this topic.
What answers are you searching for?
Frantically trying to come up with more scathing info on clinton to keep right eyes occupied?
You all hailed trump for his ag pick. Now, sessions is a pariah.
Why do you reckon that is?
How much more scathing would it need to be?
I can't figure why Sessions recused himself. I suspect neither can Trump. Easy answer Carla.
The easy answer to an easy question isnt always the correct one, bud.
True enough. Still, I'd rather wait for the answer to be given than make up one up.
DNC claimed their server was hacked but the FBI was denied access to the server when they ASKED to examine it saying that Cloudstrike (or something) had already examined it and determined the "Russians did it." Of course that company has perjury charges for telling lies in the past.
Especially with Donald on board now...they might be overwhelmed, Phil...
it's great tho...that you remember stuff like that.
I believe that comes next, after the Democrats have spent all their powder pursuing frivolous nonsense against Trump. At that point, who will say it's unfair to go after them? Nobody, that's who. Their investigation and eventual prosecution will simply be the natural conclusion of a process they themselves started.
Behold, I have created the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth an instrument for his work; and I have created the waster to destroy. No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, and their righteousness is of me, saith the Lord.'' Isaiah 54:16,17