VicZincs avatar
Share
2 57

Conservatives do value education but are shut out in colleges due to the intolerant lefty professors who do their darkest to shut up anyone who doesn't think like them.
Kids need to learn how to think, do their math, science and literature. They really don't need to know about "Jacob's New Dress."
Everyone needs to be respected and ditch the progressive agenda or more kids will be put in private schools as public schools get worse in basic education.

Nonsense. If you can't see the liberal indoctrination in the educational system, you're either just not looking or you think it's a good thing.

@VicZinc Said Boko Haram just yesterday.

No Vic, his name is Jerry, Jerry Hendrickson.

Budwicks avatar Budwick Disagree +1Reply
@Budwick No Vic, his name is Jerry, Jerry Hendrickson.

You gave me that whole James Bond mystique there Bud.

@VicZinc Is Budwick your sock?

Budwick is my NAME.

Is douche bag your game?

Budwicks avatar Budwick Disagree 0Reply
@VicZinc Is Budwick your sock?

If that reply was meant for me. I don't have time for a sock account even if I wanted one, which I don't. There is no need, I just call it like I see it.

That's an inadvertent admission of the fear they're experiencing at the thought of their child confronting different suggestions. They're afraid of their child having a mind independent from their thinking / opinions. That's just wrong.

I flatly disagree with teachers pushing 'what' to think, rather than 'how' to think, on their students. But a parent's guilty of the exact same thing should they demand that their children receive instruction which never deviates from their own ideas etc.

I want my kid to think independently from me.

To be honest, I'm not sure what people mean when they say our educational system is pushing a progressive agenda, or how they would like it changed. My knee jerk reaction is to assume they want to teach things other than evolution and a 13 billion year old universe, which I am against, but I really don't know.

I was taught Christopher Columbus discovered America, which is obvious hogwash. I don't remember learning much about the indigenous peoples living hear before the Europeans came, except for things like how they sold Manhattan for a string of beads and shared a meal with the Pilgrims. I do recall one teacher telling us the"Indians" were mistreated, but I thought she was kind of radical. Eventually I graduated high school believing that the U.S. always fought (in wars) for what is just and right. That doesn't seem like progressivism to me.

However, I was also taught that America did make mistakes, that slavery was terrible, Black Americans had been discriminated against, that Martin Luther King was a great man, and that civil disobedience was sometimes necessary to enact change. Is that progressivism?

No one is trying to limit education in the US, Vic, except of course the far Left.

And they've pretty much succeeded.

YouTube video thumbnail

Education is alive and well in America. All one has to do is listen to how intelligent and articulate the students from Parkland, Florida are in speaking out against the gun debate. They make some politicians look sick.

"Teachers Register Heavily as Democrats"
When it comes to the breakdown of political parties among Rio teachers, of the 49 teachers whose voter registration could be confirmed, 32 are registered as Democrats, 8 as Independents, 4 as Republicans, 2 as Libertarians, 1 as Green, and 1 as American Independent.
https://www.riomirada.com/uncat...-as-democrats/

Self-Identifying Marxists Outnumber Conservatives as College Professors
https://www.academia.org/self-i...ge-professors/
[1 in 5 professors are marxists, 1 in 20 are conservatives]

...

[Maze] Are American conservatives rioting and attempting to silence liberals, or even the extreme left? Nope, but the left is attempting to silence conservatives. So who values free speech? Left or right? The extreme left only tolerates speech they agree with, just like Boko Haram.

The right, even the extreme right, only wants the freedom to say whatever they want. Right? They're the ones saying shit "you're not supposed to say" because it's bigoted or racist or whatever, but when you go around saying shit like that, you're not really in a position to tell other people they can't say what's on their minds. That's why, to the left, free speech is synonymous with offensive speech. Why isn't free speech synonymous with offensive speech in the minds of people on the right? Because you're allowed to say all the things that offend conservatives, hell, it's everywhere: TV, movies, music... school... everywhere.

...

Far-left “anti-fascist” rioters assaulted numerous attendees, started fires, smashed up shops and ATMs, and attacked people’s cars during the riot on Wednesday night in protest of MILO’s UC Berkeley show, forcing the event to be cancelled.
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2...opters-appear/

Portland rose parade canceled after ‘antifascists’ threaten GOP marchers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/...=.8cbb53bda8ac

Pressure from Democrats, antifa movement forces cancellation of free speech rally in San Francisco
“a lot of innocent people were going to get hurt”
A separate right-of-center event slated for Sunday in Berkeley called “No to Marxism in America” also was cancelled by organizers over fears of violence.
https://www.washingtontimes.com...lly-in-san-fr/

@Maze "Teachers Register Heavily as Democrats" //When it comes to the breakdown of political parties among Rio teachers...

I have to agree with you on that point. Those on the far left seem to respect free speech so long as it doesn't offend their values. That is not free speech in my book. I'm not saying they have a complete monopoly on that. I have a few personal anecdotes to the contrary, but it's something they need to get through their heads.

@PhilboydStudge I have to agree with you on that point. Those on the far left seem to respect free speech so long as it doesn't...

Look familiar in intent?

"In Berlin, as in other German university towns, un-German and indecent books are being collected by the students and publicly burned."

YouTube video thumbnail

@Maze "Teachers Register Heavily as Democrats" //When it comes to the breakdown of political parties among Rio teachers...

I suggest you try convincing conservatives to become teachers.

I suspect the main reason more liberals are teaching is because they value education and are willing to work for lower wages to ensure future generations have opportunities. Conservatives value money and profits. They want to take care of only themselves and their own. They do not value educations and they see it as a source of dangerous ideas. Or is that what you just said?

@VicZinc I suggest you try convincing conservatives to become teachers. I suspect the main reason more liberals are...

No that's not what I said at all, try reading my comment before replying.

Teachers are lefties because a lot of them work for the state, and few have ever had to exist outside of the sanctuary of educational institutions. Critical thinking isn't highly valued in education, since for the most part people are merely required to absorb and regurgitate information.

As a teacher, you can believe any crazy nonsense you like as long as you show up on time and teach the curriculum. To succeed in business you need critical thinking, you need to be able to separate real truth from bullshit theories or you will fail. In a very real sense, right and left amount to street smarts vs book smarts.

Most people start off on the left and migrate right as they get older, that's definitely been true for me. I can't speak for anyone else, but in my case, it was mostly due to life experience, I got a little wiser with age and began to question the leftist orthodoxy I was bathed in throughout my youth.

@Maze No that's not what I said at all, try reading my comment before replying. Teachers are lefties because a lot of...

I am not sure if you are suggesting eliminating education because only weak minded people are willing to teach. If you are, then that is the exact arguments boko harum uses when it raids schools and burns them to the ground.

If you are not then I go back to my original response and suggest you encourage conservatives to become teachers.

@VicZinc I am not sure if you are suggesting eliminating education because only weak minded people are willing to teach. If...

Of course I'm not suggesting eliminating education, that's ridiculous. In fact it's against my religion.

Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.
Proverbs 4:7

So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

I think it's unacceptable that there are open communists teaching America's youth, because we know for a fact that communism has terrible consequences - you might as well have boko haram teaching class - communism is more deadly. America fought an ideological war against communism for over 50 years, and now 1 in 5 university professors is an open fucking commie? That's insane, incredibly dangerous. You have university professors leading political violence, teaching students that the American system is fascist and that communism is good, that it's acceptable or even desirable to silence your political opponents? How can you not see the incredible danger in that?

@Maze Of course I'm not suggesting eliminating education, that's ridiculous. In fact it's against my religion. Wisdom...

Somehow, your comment was first edited, then deleted.
????
I will try to answer your question, though. Women become liberals because that is the way they (we) think and the values we believe in. Life experience, associations, the way we were raised, the ideals we were taught, the way we see the world, and how we respond to it. Not all liberals are communists. Not all republicans are fascist.
Not all women marry conservatives. There are many liberal men, good looking successful men. Same goes for conservative men.
There are many single, conservative women. Some not so appealing. The same goes for liberal women.
Your opinion of women seems flawed.
By your writings, i think you believe that women are here only to serve men. That our value is based on the success of whom we marry, or if we do. That just doesnt hold up.

@Carla Somehow, your comment was first edited, then deleted. ???? I will try to answer your question, though. Women become...

I thought it was a little extreme in isolation from the bigger picture, so I got rid of it. It's one facet of the way things are, but it's not the entire picture. Most of your comment is what I would have wrote if I'd put my deleted comment in its full context.

You may see me as a conservative, but I see myself as a liberal in the classical sense: free thought, free speech, free enterprise.

For almost the entire history of our species, the family unit has been the center of human life. The men went out into the world and gathered resources, the women ran the homes and looked after the children. It was a full time effort on both ends, neither had it easy, but it worked, and society grew up around it.

Then some rich people with too much time on their hands decided that with the advent of labor saving devices for the home, it would be a good idea if women could be brought into the workforce. To free them from their domestic toil? Not really, women were freer than ever before, freer than modern women in some ways. But the owners reasoned that if everyone works, that's twice the production.

As a bonus, taking women out of the home meant their children would be more susceptible to the influence of the state, through sports and after school programs, lots of homework... you know how school takes over a kid's life. The more time spent on state indoctrination, the less time parents have to indoctrinate their children into their own belief systems. And with both partners working, they welcome letting the state raise their children 5 days a week.

But we are biological beings which evolved around a family paradigm, and that paradigm has been turned completely on its head for reasons that had virtually nothing to do with improving people's lives and everything to do with corporate profits.

When marriages fail, couples keep two households, that's profitable... for the real estate market, not for them. Lawyers benefit from legal fees, people have to work harder to get by, so they produce more, and it's unlikely either partner will be putting aside money that will make them independent, both partners will likely be one paycheck from broke at all times. Children from broken homes commit more crimes, that's good for the prison industry and social work indoctrination, people buying replacement stuff they lost from theft, buying security systems etc. More police, more control. Women come to see the state as the reliable provider, not men, so they fight for the state instead of their men. It's all about money and power... for the rich, for the owners, not for you.

@Maze I thought it was a little extreme in isolation from the bigger picture, so I got rid of it. It's one facet of the...

I have to say, maze....read an article in forbes titled the cause and consequence of women in labor.
It all started with world war two. Continued with womens new found ability to be higher educated and equal rights.
I know that big business profits from most things that push employees, but i dont think women in the workforce was part of a conspiracy.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2731873

Obviously women entering the workforce increases the supply of labor, and that causes wages to decline. I would just add though that regardless of this fact, without labor organizations the workers' ability to demand a living wage is also lessened. My guess is that this has more of a negative impact on wages than women in the workforce, but that's just a guess.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2732325

All fair points. Unions do bare a large share in the responsibility of their own demise.

I'm always surprised when someone had an outlook darker than my own.

@PhilboydStudge All fair points. Unions do bare a large share in the responsibility of their own demise. I'm always surprised...

Having worked closely with Unions in the past I can try to dissuade you of that notion.

Picture this, a union negotiates for a $1 an hour raise - in a big factory that might mean a $20 million dollar commitment on the company's balance sheet.

The BOD then gives the CEO a $5 million a year raise. Not an equivalent $1 per hour raise ($2,000/year) or even $10 per hour ($20,000) but $5 million ($2,500 per hour) . The union then reconvenes and reasons, well we could have asked for $1.25 an hour because clearly we left money on the table. So they go back and ask for the extra $.025.

The company finally agrees and then turns around and give the CEO a $2 million bonus. The union thinks, well heck we could have got an extra dime ....

So is it the Union over reaching, or is the fault with the board who is bend on keeping the wage gap as large as possible?

In some European companies the wage cap, though large, is more reasonable. Their unions don't keep going back to the trough because the company doesn't keep driving that gap.

When a company treats its workers as valued members instead of assets to be exploited for profit, everyone benefits.

@VicZinc Having worked closely with Unions in the past I can try to dissuade you of that notion. Picture this, a union...

I was thinking more along the lines of unions defending unproductive workers, being against technology that improves productivity but eliminates job functions, etc.. I agree with you wholeheartedly on CEO compensation. I suspect the upper echelons are not subject to the same rules of supply and demand than the rest of labor is.. it's as if the CEO and BOD are members of the same club.

Part of the issue (that's also not the fault of the unions) is globalization. How can union factories compete with those halfway around the world that are not regulated? I'm not saying I'm against regulations - many improve the lives of masses.

@Maze Here's where I got the idea from:

The point being it still happens.

This is the problem with Citizens First. This is the problem with lobbying. Our elected leaders don't write legislation, lobbyist do.

Those NRA ads are a perfect example of corporations setting the agenda for Americans.

And we, including me, are all falling for it. We hear different trumpets but we all hear trumpets.

@Maze I thought it was a little extreme in isolation from the bigger picture, so I got rid of it. It's one facet of the...

I tend to see women entering the workforce as a function of economics, though I do agree with Carla that in the U.S. it started in WWII. Nowadays in our consumer/consumption focused economy families need two bread-earners to maintain their standard of living.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2731970

Let's turn that proposition around and look at it from another angle:

Are you suggesting that self-identified white supremacists should be weeded out ideologically from educational positions? That doesn't seem like freedom of expression and speech to me. It sounds a lot like "silencing". It seems that what's important is the ability of an individual to teach the material effectively and not inject their personal bias into it. A white supremacist is not incapable of that. Neither is a Christian or a conservative or a Muslim. One's political or religious identity should not preclude them from being an educator.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2732020

Clearly we live in a society where some ideologies are considered so dangerous, so destructive that they cannot be allowed to freely propagate.

Right?

So which is more dangerous, white supremacy or communism? Clearly both are undesirable, but communist governments have killed tens of millions of their own people and perpetrated savage injustices on their entire populations. I believe that espousing communist ideology should be considered even worse than espousing white supremacist ideology because it's even more dangerous and destructive.

Therefore, absolutely, kick every self described communist to the curb, in exactly the same manner you'd do with white supremacists. That ideology has no place in education or society in general.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2732026

Spot on my friend. If you hate what someone else is saying counter it with logical argument and debate. Oppressive policies may benefit one side today, but tomorrow it will be used them.

This comment was deleted by its author.
@2732018

One could argue a lot of things, but would an openly white supremacist professor be tolerated in the present environment? I don't think so. Clearly we live in a society where some ideas are considered so dangerous, so destructive, that they cannot be allowed to freely propagate. Right? So isn't communism proven to be at least as destructive as white supremacy? How many of their own citizens did communist governments murder in the last century? How many savage injustices did it perpetrate on it's citizens in the name of that morally repugnant ideology? Many tens of millions. Yet 1 in 5 professors is a self proclaimed communist and nobody bats an eye? You don't think that's dangerous?

This comment was deleted by its author.
@2731781

Man, maze...you have a very skewed way of looking at women. My world proves your theory, unfounded and ridiculous.

@Carla Man, maze...you have a very skewed way of looking at women. My world proves your theory, unfounded and ridiculous.

Okay Carla, feel free to explain to me what causes a woman to lean left or right. Set me straight.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2731836

Can you explain how you know that the questionaire was meant to weed out certain people because of their beliefs or the area which they live. Was it explained with the questionaire? Its kind of hard for me to believe it would be that blatantly expressed as it would beg for lawsuits.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2731857

I think, as a teacher, i would make alot of noise about such a thing.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2731928

Im a leftist and do not.

This user has deactivated their account.

This is another post filled with right wing hatred - not to mention bull-pucky!

The military are low lifes, Trump should be impeached, Trump should be killed, Christians are stupid, conservative speakers are not allowed here, on and on! These stories are in the news daily.

Any one denying it is willfully ignorant.

Budwicks avatar Budwick Disagree +1Reply
@Budwick This is another post filled with right wing hatred - not to mention bull-pucky! The military are low lifes, Trump...

Lots of willfully ignorant types around, Bud.

But of course, it's more about political power than ignorance, using the Big Lie.

Anonymous