Just a simple yes or no question. Was Bill Clinton's meeting with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac a more egregious offence than the WH lawyer attending the gang of eight conference today? No need to comment, I am just curious.

Nah, I think that's actually a pretty fair comparison except for that fact that the WH meeting left those being investigated with access to evidence in an ongoing investigation.

I'm not aware of that being the case with the tarmac meeting.

IDK. I wasn't at either one, and I certainly don't trust the reporting or rumors.