+3

When Julie Swetnick is shown to be a big fat liar, should she be prosecuted to the full extent of the law?

You remember Julie, right?

Julie Swetnick became famous in late September 2018 after her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of having been present at several high school parties she attended in the early 1980s, when she was in college and Kavanaugh was in high school.
Swetnick: I Went To 10 Parties Where Girls Were Gang-Raped

Swetnick claimed she attended at least 10 of these raucous high school parties, where girls were drugged and gang-raped. Julie even claimed she was gang-raped at one party, but kept going back to them.

Of course there are no police reports or other accounts of the alleged gang rapes, and Swetnick has produced no evidence or witnesses to corroborate her claims.

Interesting Sweaty Background -
previous employer had filed defamation of character suit against her.
She "engaged in unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct" while at Webtrends and "made false and retaliatory allegations that other co-workers had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward her."
Swetnick "engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct" directed at two male employees during a business lunch.
Swetnick took medical leave and simultaneously claimed unemployment benefits in the District of Columbia.
A former boyfriend once filed a restraining order against Swetnick.

IMO this woman is not at all credible. And, should be made an example of what happens when you make false accusations. Let's investigate and ruin this woman.