+3

When Julie Swetnick is shown to be a big fat liar, should she be prosecuted to the full extent of the law?

You remember Julie, right?

Julie Swetnick became famous in late September 2018 after her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of having been present at several high school parties she attended in the early 1980s, when she was in college and Kavanaugh was in high school.
Swetnick: I Went To 10 Parties Where Girls Were Gang-Raped

Swetnick claimed she attended at least 10 of these raucous high school parties, where girls were drugged and gang-raped. Julie even claimed she was gang-raped at one party, but kept going back to them.

Of course there are no police reports or other accounts of the alleged gang rapes, and Swetnick has produced no evidence or witnesses to corroborate her claims.

Interesting Sweaty Background -
previous employer had filed defamation of character suit against her.
She "engaged in unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct" while at Webtrends and "made false and retaliatory allegations that other co-workers had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward her."
Swetnick "engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct" directed at two male employees during a business lunch.
Swetnick took medical leave and simultaneously claimed unemployment benefits in the District of Columbia.
A former boyfriend once filed a restraining order against Swetnick.

IMO this woman is not at all credible. And, should be made an example of what happens when you make false accusations. Let's investigate and ruin this woman.

Image for post When Julie Swetnick is shown to be a big fat liar, should she be prosecuted to the full extent of the law?
100%Agree0%Disagree
Budwicks avatar Law
Share
8 23
This user has deactivated their account.
@2815472

Yeah, I understand. It seems that being exposed as a liar doesn't seem to bother so many opposing Trump. Ruining someones character and career is no big deal.

I'm thinking there's gotta be consequences that hurt them back. Fines, prison time - stuff like that. Maybe bring back pillories!

This user has been banned.
@2815488

whatever happened to statute of limitations? or that a myth? you can;t wait 20 years and then bring up something when someone tries to run for office to try and ruin them. its political and BS

This user has deactivated their account.
@2815492

Yup, she either lied and should be punished.
Or, she didn't lie and is complicit and should be punished.

Yes, let's destroy this woman and her lawyer too. We should metaphorically pull their pants down publicly, ruin their future, fine them and put them in prison.

Yes, but we know it will never happen.

This user has deactivated their account.
@2815507

Maybe some time in the slammer would get her attention.

@2815507

when did the #metoo movement happen? who is always the ones being accused? the movement is a joke. a horrible destructive joke, if Hilary had won, none of this woul dbe happening. for the most part it seems like this movement is designed to try and bring down trump and supporters,

the #metoo movement is all BS, and a slap to real victims, #metoo movement, is purely political, why did Julie not report Kavenaugh sooner? why wait until he was appointed by trump? this is democrats way to try and destroy their opposition, that leaves them not far off from Hitler's fascist regime!

@deusvult the #metoo movement is all BS, and a slap to real victims, #metoo movement, is purely political, why did Julie not...

I don't have a problem with the metoo thing. Sex offenders should be brought to justice.
I think the abuse of the metoo high profile has hurt the metoo movement.
A string of bullshitters in a high profile hit job will only serve to make victims reticent about reporting the assault. And that's already a problem!

Of course democrats really don't give a shit about who or what is destroyed in their mission - to hurt Trump and protect their holy sacrament of abortion. They're convinced that Kavanaugh will walk into the court and immediately do what he can to take down Roe vs Wade. Now, if it's brought the Supreme Court, ALL the justices are supposed to rule on constitutionality - period. And, if murdering unborn children is found to be constitutional, then dems have nothing to worry about!

Yes, of course she should be prosecuted in that case, but the progressives and the MSM would be howling that it was all a vendetta by angry old white males.

Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.