OMG, Jazzy, what a naughty cat! I'm shocked, SHOCKED!!
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood.
But this is how I do my daily stretches.
I just wanted to prove that my stretches are strictly on the up and up.
Ha Ha Ha!! They should have just asked Kermit for free.
HA HA HA! Heard of dolphin porn, but never frog porn.
Dolphins are rapists
Oh good! So at least I'm not the only one with "dolphin porn" in my browsing history.
Well no not dolphins really just heard marine biologists say things like I dont know, that dolphins might not let a female feed until she puts out
Ah. Well it seems they can be a bit...insistent...with their human counterparts, as well.
wow dolphins are smart I guess they eat desert first
Had to give equal time, ya know...didn't want the SJWs on my ass.
HA HA HA!
Wait a minute! After some hasty research on the topic, I found a reference that says only 5% of men are in any danger of hitting their heads from the implied activity; i.e., those whose erect penises point within 30 degrees of straight up towards their heads.
"The following table shows how common various erection angles are for a standing male. In the table, zero degrees (0°) is pointing straight up against the abdomen, 90 degrees is horizontal and pointing straight forward, while 180 degrees would be pointing straight down to the feet."
I think that's a blood flow problem I thought they all pointed up
I didn't know it was a consideration
Well, I would be the first to admit that I personally have not seen (much less measured) a statistically significant number of erect penises, but according to the reference I cited,
the mean erection angle is roughly 67 deg below vertical, with a standard deviation of about +/- 33 deg, with only 5% falling (rising?) within 30 deg or less of vertical.
If what you say is true, then 95% of the of the subjects of the study in my reference would have to have had some degree of erectile dysfunction.
scientifically erectile dysfunction is not a real thing, more proof that I just talk out my ass sometimes and use acceptable terms the public can understand , either you have desire or not(erection is not necessary for ejaculation) penile dysfunction was made up recently to sell men pills.. wiki also called the curved one a dieses (ha a diseases) way to call something perfectly normal a diseases . I only made my comment to ,without describing myself too much, boast about my virility against the lower angle men.. I loved your information but their research was totally pointless
It's true that erection is not necessary for ejaculation or orgasm, but it is kinda necessary for penile penetration.
"Erection is a common indicator of sexual arousal and is required for a male to effect vaginal penetration and sexual intercourse."
And I think the subjects of the Wiki study were all considered normal, regarding blood flow and ED; i.e., the angle had nothing to do with either in this study.
"Although many erect penises point upwards, it is common and normal for the erect penis to point nearly vertically upwards or nearly vertically downwards or even horizontally straight forward, all depending on the tension of the suspensory ligament that holds it in position."
And yes, I agree, a lot of sex studies have little point, other than pruriency.
I think it's more important for the woman to enjoy sex that's why there is a big deal about it , but for procreation a limp dick will do.
~~the tension of the suspensory ligament is filled with blood to be come erect other wise we would always be hard.~~ Fake news
It boils down to women like men with big hard dicks so men will do what they need to achieve it.
this may be wrong but any guy who can't perform with his wife probably has no problem jerking to more attractive women, or maybe she's attractive enough but he is gay. or maybe he jerked off too much that day .real ED for health reasons is not as rampant Viagra wants you to believe. lets face it woman should not be selecting men with this problem and don't . It's the purest form of natural selection. it's the solution that's unnatural.
Um... I think it's the corpora cavernosa and the corpus spongiosum that fill with blood to cause an erection.
The suspensory ligament is not erectile, but simply supports the base of the penis. In fact, that ligament is sometimes cut for penile enlargement purposes, although I imagine the erect penis might then flop around and point in any direction.
well thank you for correcting my erecting ignorance. 1 point for you
i'm giving you the win on this one
Oh, and as far as women enjoying sex is concerned, I think it's largely a matter of timing... women in general take longer to reach orgasm than men.
sex is all mental
“Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. That's relativity.”
Yes, the turn-on is mostly mental, but the consummation nearly always requires at least a modicum of physicality.
There once was a turned-on young lad,
Whose hormones were raging like mad.
He said, "If I knew
A young lass to scr-w,
My hand would get jealous, how sad!"
his suspensory ligament was too tight
so during climax he might
make a mess of his face
or all over the place
and ruin his lonely night
i'll stop doing poetry
He discovered, much TO his delight,
That his ligament WASN'T too tight.
He'd neglected to pull
His PJs down full,
And their band was the cause of his plight.
wow the horse cock pic on wiki traumatized me and was unnecessary. well played wiki , well played
Oh, yes... as far as I know, there is nothing in the field of genitalia metrology that hasn't been studied in extreme detail. Length, girth, angle, width, depth, height, etc.
I once saw a study that claimed to show a correlation between a woman's orgasms during intercourse and the distance between her clitoris and urethral opening (the shorter, the better), funded at taxpayer expense, no doubt.
It's interesting how someone would invest such funds and time for penises.
It's just a joke...I think. Given the propensity of the US to fund stupid experiments, they could be genuine. Last year, for example, our NIH (National Institutes of Health) really did spend more than $800,000 to study the sex lives of quails high on cocaine.
Qualils but what if they found a cocaine stash, this is too rich
Maybe we could have pondered that and gotten in on the daydreaming study (nearly $2.5 million)...or we could have taken care of the quails' drug problem if we borrowed the leaf blowers used on lizards ($75,000+). Then again, perhaps that coke could have help focus a few people to find the $29 million in heavy equipment and $370 million worth of spare parts we seem to have misplaced in Afghanistan.
a penis that's wider then long is called a choud ,pronounced chode
more life experience j/k I just wanted to beat you to the punch.,.wait not beat you I mean .. get there first.... not that I mean i'm too quick … i'll stop
Okay, I've seen chubby, even chunky, penises...never saw one that was actually wider than it was long.
From personal experience...laughter tends to wilt the ready.
It's actually a really , really funny story...
they are rare and usually hide when spotted in it's natural habitat
Not too difficult, I would imagine.
a little comb over and you'll never know
In the interest of people’s sensibilities, I'll refrain from responding with my thoughts.
come on we love your thoughts
I doubt you speak for all. ;)
I speak as if i'm talking to everyone , no secrets . however if someone is too timid to speak usually I have their best interest. i'm learning how unpopular my thoughts are tho so i'll refrain from speaking for all
Au contraire...your thoughts are not unpopular...simply unspoken.