-38

Im really fucking tired orcar companies not being responsible for deaths in cars...if it was an amusment ride people would be held accountable...these car companies make cars that go faster the state regulated speed limits ..why do we let them get away with this....speed deaths surpass inpared driving and could be avoided by a speed restricter ...however this would hurt sales...fuck off automobile makers you are the leading killer of young people and its up to us to prove tbey are responsible, amirite?

20%Yeah You Are80%No Way
Toounknowns avatar
Share
0 24
The voters have decided that Toounknown is wrong! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.

So, you are saying that car manufacturers should make cars that only go 55 MPH at top speed? My deceased nephew was driving 35 when he hit some rocks on the side of the road, flipped his car, was thrown out. He died from that wreck 19 months later - all because he took his eyes off the road for a second to pick up a piece of paper. No manufacturer can control that, or produce a car that protects a person from that person's neglect, bad decision.

@beachbum So, you are saying that car manufacturers should make cars that only go 55 MPH at top speed? My deceased nephew...

Did the manufacturer give up on making a 35 mph accident survivable??? Im sorry for your loss but it seems avoidable...if i was regulating car companies designs wouldnt get approved untill they focused on safety. What other goal do they have. Their job is to keep you safe from and get you to your destination. Every other result is a failure of product

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -12Reply
@Toounknown Did the manufacturer give up on making a 35 mph accident survivable??? Im sorry for your loss but it seems...

He was driving a 20 year old Suburban - the kind built like a tank. Yes, his wreck was avoidable - he never should have taken his eyes off the road. No manufacturer can produce a product that will withstand someone's neglect, bad decisions.
I do appreciate your passion for car safety, but have to disagree that anything can be produced that can withstand someone's carelessness. You can blame the manufacturers of spoons for someone eating a gallon of ice cream.

@beachbum He was driving a 20 year old Suburban - the kind built like a tank. Yes, his wreck was avoidable - he never...

Its the old..." If i punch the air and you get in my way its your fault".. I just watched ford vs. Ferrari...great movie but we dont need fast cars we need safe ones...how about a thropie for the fastest survivable car ever

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -11Reply
@Toounknown Its the old..." If i punch the air and you get in my way its your fault".. I just watched ford vs. Ferrari...great...

Not the same at all.
His wreck occurred on a country road when he took his eyes off the road to get a piece of paper. He was not speeding since there had been some road construction and there were a lot of loose rocks on the side of the road. Assuming his left hand was on the steering wheel when he bent down, the car hit the rocks and skid. He had been a police officer at one time, so he tried maneuvers he hadt learned, but the vehicle still flipped and he was thrown out. Obviously, he wasn't wearing his seat belt - another bad decision on his part. Even his bat guano crazy idiot wife knew it wasn't a defective vehicle since she knows how (and does it well) work the system, so she would have sued them for as much as she could have gotten.

My question is this - exactly what safety feature could have prevented him from losing control and the vehicle flipping? I'm curious what you think.

@beachbum Not the same at all. His wreck occurred on a country road when he took his eyes off the road to get a piece of...

Im not saying we should sue them ...im trying to get them to admit that cars are the reason for these deaths, they ship unsafe products...something as dangerous as cars need to be foolproof so that you can survive them flipping over...doesnt it bother you that once that car flipped they did not care about the safty of your nephew...do they even safty test cars on constrution roads and agaisnt giant contrution viehicles, no...because they dont care. Also the road crews are notorious for throwing stones all over the road, and guess who is resposible for constrution stones on the road, NOBODY...because they don't want responsibilty for their negligence

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -12Reply
@Toounknown Im not saying we should sue them ...im trying to get them to admit that cars are the reason for these deaths, they...

Also many times the car does malfuction and go out of control...sure the lawyers will hold them accountable for your death, but its alittle to late for you by then

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -17Reply

Jeez calm down . and some dont limit speed because some places have pretty high speed limits and some people use cars for races

@hawaiian Jeez calm down . and some dont limit speed because some places have pretty high speed limits and some people use...

Ive argued wasteful shit alot...i feel like i can save people with this one...i regret saying "shut up" i like hearing your thoughts

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -1Reply

thats kinda like saying alcohol companies should be held responsible for every crime, accident, or addiction connected to alcohol, even though theres warnig labels

@hawaiian thats kinda like saying alcohol companies should be held responsible for every crime, accident, or addiction...

Well they are..they just get away with it....even bar tenders get sued after letting drunk drivers leave...why not the makers

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -2Reply
@Toounknown You cant be trusted to drive the speed limit

if i make a computer i shouldn't have to worry about hackers if i make knives i shouldn't have to worry about stabbings if i make hammers i shouldn't have to worry about people beating each other. the creator shouldn't be held responsible for what the consumer does with it. the consumers should know right from wrong.

@Toounknown Ok then ill go buy my bazooka now

Just because you have the law on your side doesnt make you right...if i had my way parents would be responsible for their childrens actions... It seems like you want to have the freedom to be a criminal and thats exactly what im against

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -2Reply
@hawaiian if i make a computer i shouldn't have to worry about hackers if i make knives i shouldn't have to worry about...

Dont distract the topic ...im Talking about cars and only cars ...your misunderstanding of this topic is not productive to saving lives...i know im right on this one and time will tell

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -2Reply
@Toounknown Dont distract the topic ...im Talking about cars and only cars ...your misunderstanding of this topic is not...

Your examples are of people actively trying to cause pain...cars do it to random people accidently

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -2Reply

The people who design cars have to design them to meet certain safety standards. And those examples are precisly my point the creator cannot control the consumers actions

@hawaiian The people who design cars have to design them to meet certain safety standards. And those examples are precisly my...

Shut up...im saying they should control the drivers actions by not allowing cars to get out of control with dangerous speeds....yes your right they are not responsible...im saying they should be

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -1Reply
@Toounknown Do they do safty test on max speed ....no

Thats what laws do...if we called this argument a war..it would be legal for you to kill me...does that sound right

Toounknowns avatar Toounknown Yeah You Are -1Reply

By the way your spelling needs work

Likewise

Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.