The voters have decided that Adamaooooo is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Also by Adamaooooo-31Whenever you think of sports channels- you think of them as boring, so doesn’t that apply to writers to some extent Amirite?
Also by Adamaooooo+18I should allow you guys decide what I eat for breakfast on Sunday Amirite? More
Also about opinion and copy+273Everybody twitters and everybody blogs, but no one says anything...they just copy past it all. That's how one persons opinion becomes everybodys thoughts, amirite?
Also about opinion+147Chic-fil-A and Oreo are good examples of why you don't mix strong opinion with your business. It doesn't matter what the opinion is or what it supports; it's best to keep the controversy to yourself. Besides, we're already being drowned by advertising. Now we have to deal with propaganda being shoved down our throats? Businesses should just sell their products or services and shut up, amirite?
Also about opinion+179The Human Race is pretty hypocritical. For example when most people say that “everyone is entitled to their own opinion” what they actually mean is “everyone is entitled to their own opinion as long as I agree with it or it happens to be the general accepted standard opinion. If it doesn’t meet any of those two reasons they you’re allowed to bash it.” Amirite?
Also about opinion+131You hate it when you make an awesome / sexy-ass opinion here but it's so good that whoever reads it gets blinded by it's sheer sexiness alone, thus not being able to vote on it, and on top of that the opinion never ends up getting it's dream of being home paged or being post of the day; it's a pretty sad thing to think about, amirite?
Also about unpopular opinion+35Unpopular opinion: Lawyer isn't a dishonest profession. A lawyer's responsibility is not to state their opinion on guilt or innocence, but to state their opinion on what one must believe to justify believing guilt or innocence. This, in turn, is grounded in the idea that every crime deserves justice and every defendant deserves a fair defense. So, for example, the defense could believe their client is guilty, yet defend their client in court in good conscience, because they aren't saying they think their client is innocent, just that they see a way someone could reasonably think that, amirite?