+24
Since judges are in fact allowed to throw out a conviction by the jury regardless of the guilty verdict, the justice system proves that jurors are unnecessary in a conviction. So in fact- the judge doesn't even have to agree with the jury. Despite the judge asking for the jury's verdict. Otherwise the judge wouldn't have the choice to throw out the conviction and would just allow a retrial be granted through the appellate process, amirite?
Your totally backwards...but thanks for trying...someone convicted of a crime by a judge has every right to appeal to a higher court... When they do this they ask for judgement over ruling the last ( ass head corrupt judges ) decision
Its sad that the people who agree with you probably plead guilty to their charges
Judges are more likely to be the reasonable ones...not the written law