if the odds of there being an armed maniac are high for any given location. then the odds of there being two armed mainiacs are stupendously high. Always carry a gun. It's safer. amirite?
Or...Or..and this is just a wild suggestion here.. maybe don't have guns everywhere and then the chances of there being even one armed maniac fall to nearly zero...eliminating the need to have a gun to protect yourself from to begin with. Again, this is just a wild theory being practiced in the vast majority of the civilized world. Call me crazy.
If the odds of any given location are high that there is an armed manic there, ask yourself if there might be something wrong with arming people in the first place.
Found the Texan
They could be Canadian, you don't know..
Nothing increases overall survival rate like moar bullets flying through air, boy howdy.
Wot?
If you are an armed maniac, the odds of there being another are ridiculously high.
So you best be the armed maniac.
ooooooh
Hmm sounds like texas but aight
Or...Or..and this is just a wild suggestion here.. maybe don't have guns everywhere and then the chances of there being even one armed maniac fall to nearly zero...eliminating the need to have a gun to protect yourself from to begin with. Again, this is just a wild theory being practiced in the vast majority of the civilized world. Call me crazy.
Ok, you're crazy.
If you carry a gun with you, the probability of there being an armed maniac being wherever you are become 1.
Yes but what are the odds of 2 armed maniacs?
Did your buddy tell you to hold his beer? If so, then also 1.
basic logic is not a requirement for a permit.
If the odds of any given location are high that there is an armed manic there, ask yourself if there might be something wrong with arming people in the first place.
Somepeople don't like human rights.
Stats show that the number of deaths by accident simply by owning a gun are way higher.
So no gun is safer.
I think you're the armed maniac man.