Will Humans "PC" Themselves Out of Existence? This is an article which was originally published in 2005 in, among others, the late great Men’s News Daily. I felt it appropriate to republish it, today, as little seems to have changed with regards to the lunacy and growing dangers surrounding the continued application of “political correctness. I offer it, again, as a reminder of one of the areas where we began with this ideology and—sadly—how little progress we seem to have made in ending its false premise and overall message. With the upcoming November elections, I believe that the only way we can change this for the betterment of humans is to elect and place Donald J. Trump into the US presidency. Here's the Article: Will Humans “PC” Themselves Out of Existence? January 27, 2005 by Sher Zieve Although there was no legal basis for its initial implementation, Political Correctness supposedly began as a tool of the Left to ensure that people are “sensitive” to the “feelings” of others; ostensibly the minorities. However, today the mainstream media and leftists (same thing) have made the decision that PC extends beyond its original scope to now include our (actually their) “terrorist friends”; those “friends” who have vowed to implant Islam worldwide and to destroy the United States and all of its non-Muslim inhabitants. In the name of PC the press refers to these terrorists as insurgents or, as the inimitable Michael Moore would say, “freedom fighters”. This is, of course, unconscionable. But, because they can, the mainstream press still persists in presenting an inaccurate and misleading caricature of the enemy’s behaviors. They are using this self-created tool well and to their specific advantage. More 
+1Dear Progressives, Thank You for Reminding Us of the Real Reasons We Fight You! As if they see the world in only one or two dimensions, so-called “progressives” seem incapable of processing their overwhelming emotions outside a narrow framework of self-pity and raging narcissism. Because they appear to think about the world around them in ways guided entirely by emotion, unlike their foes who see emotion as a dangerous foundation for permanent change, they react to disappointment or loss as self-righteous victims, or antisocial thugs, rather than mentally sound individuals. We have been subjected to their scorn and ridicule for years. violent confrontations with people expressing a view they don’t like, or assaults on police, or riots over fake narratives, or obnoxious thugs who verbally and physically assault otherwise decent people who resist. It’s all of a kind, and a common thread in all of this seems to be their belief in a right to be as offensive and aggressive as one can be, as if this validates the illusion that they’re right, and so are entitled to correct the nonbeliever. There is also the implied premise that virtue is the sole property of these embittered, angry zealots, whose reflexive dehumanization of every person who disagrees animates so much of what they say or do. More 
