+40Most people want you to have the same opinions as them, not for the greater good, but for self-validation. amirite?
+5There should be a new National law for there to be a minimum amount of time in total for voters relative to that county population. So States like Georgia can't try to make it harder for people to vote in Counties with a higher African-American population. And that being different with each population, based importantly on the number of voting polls. Because even if the amount of time is normal, but the number of lines to vote is low, voters would need more time to all vote, amirite?
Want to ask your own question? Make A Post
+8For farsighted people who also believe that the grass is greener on the other side, seeing what is right in front of them is practically inconceivable. amirite?
+17Most people wanting stricter gun laws, don't even know most of the gun laws, even in their own city/state. amirite?
+10People learning and spreading a language in a wrong way is much better than people not learning that language at all, amirite?
-14Why is it socially acceptable to say “White people are.......” but if you were to say “Black people are......” you are immediately considered a racist? It’s time to tell these blatant hypocrites who are enforcing this double standard to go fuck themselves. Amirite?
-7You would think someone would notice that WHITE people are largely the victims of mass shootings ...but you just dont care, amirite?
+13The shooter in the King Soopers grocery store in Boulder, Colorado -- 21-year-old Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, had moved to the United States in 2002, from none other than Syria. 3 years after ISIS was founded in 1999 and has been all his life. And now he randomly killed 10 people. With no apparent motive. Coincidence? Maybe not, huh? Maybe his motive for the 10 shooting murders was that he is sympathetic to ISIS in his home-Country- Syria, amirite?
+14This century, there have been more than enough mass shootings for Congress to finally ban assault weapons. After all, people don't need weapons that fire rapidly just to fire back at a would-be killer. We don't need rapid-firing assault weapons in our community. And banning assault weapons won't defy the second amendment, since it would only limit their rights based on types of guns. Ordinary handguns/rifles/shotguns are enough, but rapid-firing weapons only benefit serial killers, amirite?