+2,175Take chances. Tell the truth. Date someone totally wrong for you. Say no. Spend all your cash. Get to know someone random. Be random. Say I love you. Sing out loud. Laugh at stupid jokes. Cry. Apologize. Tell someone how much they mean to you. Tell a jerk what you think. Laugh till your stomach hurts. Regret nothing. This is the way to live life, amirite?
-60The only Truth we have is the Bible. Jesus is the way, the Truth, and the Life. Also, He's the only way to heaven, amirite?
+12In every controversy, both sides think that their position is right and both think that they alone know the truth. I conclude that there is no right and no wrong. I conclude that the truth cannot be known. Neither side is 100% correct nor is either 100% wrong.
Game: Add a comment with two statements about yourself. One will be truth and the other one will be a lie about you. The point of the game is to make it hard for others to figure out which one is true. More
Want to ask your own question? Make A Post No need to login!
-377Atheists are only in denial because deep inside, they fear God. And their just not ready yet to come out of the closet and finally accept the truth. Amirite?
-136Scientists explore truth but Christianity is the truth, scientists are just too prideful to accept that truth.
+142You fear the future of mankind when you talk to people who have engrained in their minds such ludicrous thoughts and ideologies that are bogus with knowledge refuting them wholely but they refuse to acknowledge the reality of their teachings being wrong on the basis that they were taught that was the truth from an early age. Amirite?
knowledge is defined as true belief. belief is easy but proving truth requires a knowledge of truth. this is the key problem of epistemology. all systems of logic have been broken or failed to address the issue that is uncertainty. we rely on our senses which are fallible. and even if our senses were infallible we can not see the complexity of our universe as a whole and only could understand things from a local perspective. even barring that issue say we could see everything from all perspectives could we even comprehend the system meaningfully? is it even necessary to understand the truth? things function weather we know how they work or not. i guess that leads me to the conclusion i have reached. no matter how i try or what i learn the truth is relative to my experience, knowledge is therefore unattainable and unnecessary for any function, and everything i believe is just that a belief. so it stands to reason that the answer to any complex question i ponder is this. dont think about it. its a waste of time and the conclusion is ultimately without purpose. faith is the default and you will be no happier or superior for the pursuit of knowledge because all knowledge is just faith built upon itself. everything is built upon pillars of sand. so i guess this makes me wonder if knowledge is not worth pursuing what is and i guess the answer is what you would expect i dont know. all i have left is what i started with my feeling.
+757There is only one sin, only one. And that is theft. Every other sin is a variation of theft....When you kill a man, you steal a life. You steal his wife's right to a husband, rob his children of a father. When you tell a lie, you steal someone's right to the truth. When you cheat, you steal the right to fairness (the kite runner) amirite?
-183It doesn't matter whether or not the government recognizes your marriage, a truth does not depend on a government endorsement to be true. have a private ceremony, be married, and stop bitching that people won't let you, amirite?
+212Just the Tip' of the day: Ladies, when you expect a guy to be completely honest with you, I laugh. You women wear heels- you're not that tall, you wear makeup- you don't look like that, you color you hair- you are not a blonde.. Everything about you is a lie and you expect a man to tell you the truth?! .. amirite?
+10Okay....potus trump could have gotten answers from intellegence agencies immediately regarding his allegations of wiretapping and relayed those answers to the people. He chose not to. Likely because he didnt want the truth. Now.....he could open up his and others records to clarify everything that is being investigated. Wonder why he choses not to do that??? If he and his people are innocent of wrongdoing, why would he not want this all behind him?? He promised transparency, anybody remember that? If he has done nothing wrong, why is he behaving like he has?