The Harry Potter movies made me wanna kill myslf, they were brutal compared to the books, honestly..

by Anonymous 13 years ago

At least the 5th one was... So bad! The 3rd was pretty good I thought (but Lupin's transformation made me want to cry) and so was the 6th but the 6th was only good because it was funny... not really good compared to the book. The others are just kind of "meh".

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The first two were the best. Then Chris Columbus stopped producing and they kept changing directors.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

They were pretty good... but I love me some Prisoner of Azkaban! That's probably my favorite movie, but it was also one of my very favorites of the books. But, yeah I'd have to agree... my movie rating (so far) is probably 3, 2, 1, 6, 4, 5. The fourth was way too long for my tastes (although the book was as well... it seemed to have the depth of the first 3 and the length of the last 3 IMO, and that wasn't a good combo) and the fifth doesn't even deserve to be mentioned. Absolutely horrible.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I agree with you for the most part. But people watched the LOTR movies, so they should make 3 hour long HP movies.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

6 and 3 were good

by Anonymous 13 years ago

3 was shorter than Stone

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Box office earnings of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, the most loyal Harry Potter movie: 249 million Box office earnings of The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, the least loyal Lord of the Rings movie: 339 million I think movie studios know what they're doing.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Im definately gonna have to agree, im glad somebody else agreed with me

by Anonymous 13 years ago

WHOA! Two examples... good job -__-

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Pride & Prejudice was a good book, but an even greater movie. There were significant looks and exhanges that really couldn't be depicted accurately through words.

by Anonymous 13 years ago