+27 If we are going to teach creation science as an alternative to evolution, than we should also teach the stork theory as an alternative to biological reproduction, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Creation and evolution are not mutually exclusive. One is about how things started, the other is about how things changed.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No. If you are a creationist, you believe that God put Adam and Eve on the world. They were humans. The dominant species is still humans. If you are an evolutionist, you believe life started at some point with one single cleed organism. It then reproduced and evloved into all the different species of the world.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

not necessarily. creationist scientists who believe in evolution believe that god created the first self-replicating cell, and things went on from there.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

What evidence do you have that we all originate from single celled organisms? Please only respond with scientific evidence... tests that have been run, experiments that have been proven conclusive, etc.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

INB4 Scrantonc- Oh wait ...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I have a feeling he will post. I have heard humors that he is still here as an anon, posting things. Some people have recognized his writing style. So if there is an anon in a comment war, I have a feeling it is him.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes, I was talking about that with Spearmintmilk the other day - Anon comments which are from him, and I've had Anon questions on my formspring which had some words I didn't recognise, so I asked Janelle, and she said that Scrantoncity had used them in an argument with her. Not conclusive proof, I know, but still.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, I read a convo between BreakfastFan and Spearmilkmilk saying the same thing.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

As well as my FS being trolled, I'm still trying to figure out if he may be the Anon I argued with on this post: http://www.amirite.net/492813

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah that's the post I was thinking about with my convo with Breakfastfan.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yeah, I read almost the whole convo (all but the last three messages or so), and it sounds like him.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

the reason they dont teach creationism in public schools is because it's a religious theory. evolution is part of science, which they teach in public schools, so it would make sense that they would teach evolution. also, the stork thing isn't a theory, it's something parents tell their children so they don't have to tell them the truth, not something that people that are on a level to decide what's real and what's not for themselves actually believe. so much flawed logic, so little time.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I say that if you want your child learning a nonscientific theory, send your kids to a private school or homeschool them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Because getting dumped on your parents' doorsteps by birds totally has just as much basis in research as evolution, if not more, right?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This post is against creationism...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I love how this has so many No Ways, with reasoning that screams "I don't get it"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

sarcasm, people.

by Anonymous 13 years ago