It doesn't make any sense as to why they can't cut a bit of the budget for the arts, and a bit of the budget for sports. There's no reason they have to completely destroy one, amirite?

+343 It doesn't make any sense as to why they can't cut a bit of the budget for the arts, and a bit of the budget for sports. There's no reason they have to completely destroy one, amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Cutting a bit of both budgets would cripple both things, pissing off two groups of people. Completely cutting one would only piss off one group.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I KNOW RIGHT? Can someone PLEASE tell this to principal Figgins?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

But what aboot the PROPHECY?!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I don't know, I'm just glad my school chose arts so we get new marching percussion for band.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

What? My band has ZERO help from our school, it sucks.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Sports generally brings in more money and has overall, more children (and thus more parents = money) invested in it. So if a school had to slash Arts budget or Sports, they would go with the one that has the two reasons listed above.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Wouldn't that make sports more self-sufficient then?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Really? My high school had twice the arts kids than sports kids. They should really determine the budget based on how many students are enrolled in each program.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

But that wouldn't make a good TV episode.

by Anonymous 12 years ago