No thanks; I'll keep my younger-looking, smooth, cancer-free skin. Have fun with that leatherface, it's really sexy.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Wow did I say fake tan anywhere in there..?
by Anonymous13 years ago
No, it is not. No skin color is inferior to another. If we're talking about natural skin color and not tanning due to exposure to UVB rays, you're basically saying that one ethnicity or national origin is better than another. My tan German friend is not better than me because I'm pale white and Norwegian.
Besides, pale skin is pretty. (:
by Anonymous13 years ago
I'm pale and get called names all the time, I would say being tan is better but who likes cancer and looking old at the age of 30?
by Anonymous13 years ago
Have fun with your cancer and leather skin!
by Anonymous13 years ago
NATURALLY TAN PEOPLE REPRESENT! :D
by Anonymous13 years ago
First of all, not all tan people will get cancer..some people (including me) were born tan, so keep that in mind.
But I don't see why people think tan people are prettier/"hotter" than pale people. I think both are fine. I do like being tan though.
by Anonymous13 years ago
This is the Internet... Most of these kids aren't getting any sun
by Anonymous13 years ago
All skin colour is good.
by Anonymous13 years ago
I would actually prefer a slightly pale girlfriend than a overly tanned near-Mexican one.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Well, I don't want a brown one from tanning, but there's no denying that Central American girls are very good looking.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Meh, I like white girls. P.S. That's not racist, you tend to be attracted to those like people you grew up with. I.E. White girls.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Yeah, well of course I do, I'm just saying, the hottest would be a Latino, in my opinion.
by Anonymous13 years ago
of course not that there's anything wrong with Mexican girls
by Anonymous13 years ago
Yeah, it's just when they tan so that they're as dark as Mexican girls, spay tan or not.
by Anonymous13 years ago
It depends on the person...
by Anonymous13 years ago
Farmers tan, I got the best of both worlds.
by Anonymous13 years ago
You sir, won everything.
by Anonymous13 years ago
As long as it doesn't look like you've never been outside in your life, it's fine with me...
by Anonymous13 years ago
Orange vs. natural?
by Anonymous13 years ago
Only if you mean naturally
by Anonymous13 years ago
When I YYA'd this, I was thinking a natural tan (as in, were born with it). I think that's prettier, but any UVB ray based tan definitely isn't worth it.
by Anonymous13 years ago
I am very pale. I like being pale WAY more than when I was tan. Besides, I would rather look younger. I don't think naturally tan skin is bad, this is just my preference. (:
by Anonymous13 years ago
I have naturally tan skin. D:
I think natural is nice, but if it's spray tan or UV light tan, then noooo.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Obviously people who are pale (regardless of race) will try and defend pale skin, but I'd rather take a tan complexion naturally over a pale, sickly looking complexion any day.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Pale skin doesn't necessarily have to make you look sickly. You can have a fair and beautiful pale complexion just like you can have a beautiful golden and tan skin tone (as opposed to a creepy orange tan).
by Anonymous13 years ago
orange skin is not beter than pail skin
by Anonymous13 years ago
Depends- do you mean plastic pail skin, metal pail skin, or wooden pail skin?
by Anonymous13 years ago
I am a swimmer, so naturally I have a pretty deep tan. In my opinion, a really pale skin-tone s my opinion, but that might be because I am around lots of tan people. (I am a swimmer in California, after all.)
by Anonymous13 years ago
Hey, me too!
by Anonymous13 years ago
YAY! Go swimming!
by Anonymous13 years ago
Fuck. I'm still a ginger.
by Anonymous13 years ago
All natural skin tones are beautiful.
by Anonymous13 years ago
I think the upside to having naturally tan skin is that you don't burn as easily. I'm pretty pale, and I get burnt from sitting outside at lunchtime.
by Anonymous13 years ago
If I could have chosen, I would have been tan instead of pale.
by Anonymous13 years ago
I think tan is more attractive because it means the person actually goes outside pretty often. People who are pasty white because of lack of sun are not attractive.
by Anonymous13 years ago
No preference.
by Anonymous13 years ago
I don't really care which one. I'm pale, and I'm fine with it, and I wouldn't care if I was tan.
by Anonymous13 years ago
I feel like you cant say one is more attractive than the other. As long as its natural it looks good. If its a fake tan, then no its not more attractive than anything because looking like an oopma loompa is never a good look.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Tans are better if you're talking about a natural tan or a not to dark, good spray tan(they do exist) because you don't look leathery more sunkissed or golden. Pale skin imo is ugly and sickly looking if you're too pale, although Some pale skin looks allright if it's basically neutral/almost pale. But I'm not talking Edward Cullen lookin' shit.
This is coming from a pale person
by Anonymous13 years ago
imm really tan, and I love my skin but somtimes I think pale looks better
by Anonymous13 years ago
LOL it's funny the girls saying pale is prettier and tanned people are gunna get cancer.
Pretty sure fair skin is more prone to getting damaged,
I'm proud I can sit outside for lunch and not get fucking burned & and become a lobster.
Natural sunkissed tans, those are gorgeous. Any guy would agree lol.
People are so close minded, asians like pale because it gives a look of innocence and purity.
Tanned just looks good, face the facts jealous bitches. <3 ;)
by Anonymous12 years ago
Asians actually like being pale because back then it was a symbol of wealth.
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 11 years ago