+295 Paying $47 for an American Eagle shirt that doesn't even have the logo on it is a bit too much, amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Paying 47$ for a shirt with a logo is a bit too much too. All you're doing is paying THEM to be a walking billboard.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

my grandmother tells me this. She says that "THEY SHOULD PAY YOU!"

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Why does it matter if there's a logo or not? Besides, define "shirt", because that can mean a lot of things when people group every piece of clothing that covers the upper half of your body together as a "shirt". I've paid $50 for AE "shirts" if sweaters counts as them in your mind.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Every time I walk into a hollister, A.E, or Aeropostale, I think "Whoa, this is just like garanimals for teens!"

by Anonymous 12 years ago

A logo shouldn't make a shirt cost any more or less.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I hate shirts with brand logos. That's not style. At all. It's just trying to fit in.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Why would you WANT the logo? You're basically just a walking ad then. Also, $47.00 for any article of clothing is too much, particularly AE.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

The logo shouldn't affect the price, and $47??? I know this is partly cause I'm poor but I honestly think I only have about 3 shirts that cost more than $10.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I no wayed because it's a lot too much not a little

by Anonymous 12 years ago