+295
Paying $47 for an American Eagle shirt that doesn't even have the logo on it is a bit too much, amirite?
by Anonymous12 years ago
Paying 47$ for a shirt with a logo is a bit too much too. All you're doing is paying THEM to be a walking billboard.
by Anonymous12 years ago
my grandmother tells me this. She says that "THEY SHOULD PAY YOU!"
by Anonymous12 years ago
Why does it matter if there's a logo or not?
Besides, define "shirt", because that can mean a lot of things when people group every piece of clothing that covers the upper half of your body together as a "shirt". I've paid $50 for AE "shirts" if sweaters counts as them in your mind.
by Anonymous12 years ago
Every time I walk into a hollister, A.E, or Aeropostale, I think "Whoa, this is just like garanimals for teens!"
by Anonymous12 years ago
A logo shouldn't make a shirt cost any more or less.
by Anonymous12 years ago
I hate shirts with brand logos. That's not style. At all. It's just trying to fit in.
by Anonymous12 years ago
Why would you WANT the logo? You're basically just a walking ad then. Also, $47.00 for any article of clothing is too much, particularly AE.
by Anonymous12 years ago
The logo shouldn't affect the price,
and $47??? I know this is partly cause I'm poor but I honestly think I only have about 3 shirts that cost more than $10.
by Anonymous12 years ago
I no wayed because it's a lot too much not a little
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago