+446
Somebody should definetly make a soap that dosen't hurt when it gets in your eyes, amirite?
by Anonymous13 years ago
I dunno, they have that Johnson's baby soap, but I just think getting anything in your eyes is gonna hurt in some way or another.
Oh, I'm actually thinking of the shampoo... but still.
by Anonymous13 years ago
I was thinking of that too ChubbyBunniez.
by Anonymous13 years ago
If you aren't smart enough to keep the soap out of your eyes you deserve to feel the pain
by Anonymous13 years ago
Having soap fall into your eyes doesn't make you stupid, silly.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Not being smart enough doesn't automatically make you stupid. It doesn't mean your smart either
by Anonymous13 years ago
*you're.
Haven't you ever done that, though?
by Anonymous13 years ago
I like the pain
by Anonymous13 years ago
Seriously. It's really not even that bad.
by Anonymous13 years ago
JOHNSON'S BABY SHAMPOO, BITCH.
x)
by Anonymous13 years ago
they made that in the early 2000s i think. loreal kids. didnt work, though. i was a kid at the time btw.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Well, technically, if it's a good soap, it would be impossible to make one that wouldn't hurt when it got in your eyes. A good soap should be a base (pH above 7), and if it's going to get in your eyes, the base is going to be an irritant. If it didn't hurt in your eyes, then it wouldn't be a good soap.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Learn to spell "definitely" correctly, then be optically soap-free!
by Anonymous13 years ago
Baby Tearless Soap, we have it at our house.
Being the stupid person i am, I tested if it hurts when it gets in your eye.
My results? Considerably less, but still irritating >.<
by Anonymous13 years ago
It's called "No More Tears" by Johnson & Johnson. The reason it's marketed toward children is because they figure adults are smart enough not to get soap in their eyes.
by Anonymous13 years ago
You don't WANT a "tearless" soap though. Soap is already weak as it is. "Tearless" just means "With 10x more water than usual!". The original soap was a stronger base than now because it was pure and not filled with water. It would literally take the skin off of you. That's good soap. You are then very clean. Now, they take that and put so much water and perfume in it, you're paying for the smell, the plastic from the bottle, and the water with maybe 10% of the contents really being soap. I got sort of off-topic. Oh well.
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago