+119 It's weird how somewhere along our past, we were all just single celled organisms and eventually evolved. So theoretically, we're related to the food we eat, even though extremely distant. amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Except for the fact that we DID NOT evolve, yes.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Fact?? Where's the proof that we didn't evolve??

by Anonymous 13 years ago

1. The instructions for how to build, operate, and repair living cells represent a vast amount of information (estimated at 12 billion bits). Information is a mental, non-material concept. It can never arise from a natural process and is always the result of an intelligence. Just as a newspaper story transcends the ink on the paper, life’s DNA itself (like the ink) is not the information, it is simply a physical representation or housing of the information (the story). Modifying the DNA via mutation can never produce new genetic information to drive upward evolution, just as spilling coffee on the newspaper, thereby modifying the distribution of the ink, will never improve the story. Go to this link: http://mall.turnpike.net/C/cs/top.htm for way more evidence.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Lol I will never buy into any of that shit. It is an opinion. You can not say that either creationism or evolution is fact, dumbass.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ok, well, you have your own opinion, and I have mine.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes exactly! But you said "DID NOT evolve"... you can have your own opinion all you want but you can not say that one or the other is fact. As long as you understand that now.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yep...I understand that neither creation are fact...and we can both go on our way with our own opinions. :)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Don't we share 50% of our DNA with a banana?

by Anonymous 12 years ago