+634
Had Morgan Freeman been born one century earlier, his surname would have been very ironic, amirite?
by Anonymous13 years ago
Racist jerk =P
by Anonymous13 years ago
what do you mean racist? black people werent free back then. its a fact, not a racist opinion
by Anonymous13 years ago
He wouldn't have had a surname.
by Anonymous13 years ago
^^ what the ninja said.
by Anonymous13 years ago
^^ what the ninja said.
by Anonymous13 years ago
or maybe the name is a result of what happened a century before...
cue BreakfastFan...
by Anonymous13 years ago
^^ What the Kitteh said
by Anonymous13 years ago
That's where the name comes from...
by Anonymous13 years ago
Okay...how has no one caught this? First off, there was only slavery in the southeast part of this country, which was the only one still practicing slavery. So the chances he would have been free are pretty high.
by Anonymous13 years ago
and a century ago was 1910, slavery was outlawed by then.
by Anonymous13 years ago
He wasn't born in 2010.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Hahah ohhhh I interpreted it as "alive" a century ago.... Sorry...
by Anonymous13 years ago
The surname Freeman was created for former slaves. They had no surnames, and they couldn't legally take the surname of their owners. It was second only to Washington as a name choosen/assinged to freed slaves.
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago