+240
Why is the word kind at the end of the word mankind? We are nothing of the sort, amirite?
by Anonymous12 years ago
Humans are inherently good.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Thank you, Mr. Locke.
by Anonymous12 years ago
These melodramatic posts about how terrible humanity is are getting old. Yeah, that dude who drove his elderly neighbor to the hospital because she broke her hip is a real douche.
by Anonymous12 years ago
This post reminds me of a poem by ee cummings.
"pity this busy monster, manunkind,
not. Progress is a comfortable disease:
your victim (death and life safely beyond)
plays with the bigness of his littleness
--- electrons deify one razorblade
into a mountainrange; lenses extend
unwish through curving wherewhen till unwish
returns on its unself.
A world of made
is not a world of born --- pity poor flesh
and trees, poor stars and stones, but never this
fine specimen of hypermagical
ultraomnipotence. We doctors know
a hopeless case if --- listen: there's a hell
of a good universe next door; let's go"
by Anonymous12 years ago
For the same reason pig is at the end of guinea pig. Out of all the guinea pigs I see and meet every day, only a few are compulsive over-eaters. The "pig" isn't a reference to our diets, it's to the sound we make when excited over the prospect of a good carrot. Similarly, "kind" is being used to indicate the type of something, like "I want that kind of vase," or "It was that kind of day." Humankind simply means the kind of animal that we call human, not that humans in themselves are particularly kind. Although I do know some nice ones.
by Anonymous12 years ago
i like the sound of mandouche.
by Anonymous12 years ago
or maybe because kind means type.
like, what kind of candy are you eating?
this is not clever.
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago